Between 1977 and 1995, real after-tax hourly compensation for production workers fell by almost 14 percent. Both real pre-tax wages and the real value of benefits fell over this period. These estimates were generated using a cost-of-living index that was adjusted for a wide range of upward and downward biases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaron, Henry J., Barry P. Bosworth, and Gary T. Burtless. 1989. Can America Afford to Grow Old?: Paying for Social Security. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
2.
Abraham, Katharine G. 1996. Statistics in the Spotlight: Improving the Consumer Price Index. Unpublished paper presented at the meeting of the American Statistical Association, Chicago, IL, August 6.
3.
Abraham, Katharine G., John S. Greenlees, and Brent R. Moulton. 1998. Working to Improve the Consumer Price Index. Journal of Economic Perspectives12 (1): 3-26.
4.
Baker, Dean. 1997. Getting Prices Right: The Debate Over the Consumer Price Index. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
5.
Baye, Michael R. and Dan A. Black. 1988. The Microeconomic Foundations of Measuring Bracket Creep and Other Tax Changes. Economic Inquiry26: 471-484.
6.
Boskin, Michael J., Ellen R. Dulberger, Robert J. Gordon, Zvi Griliches, and Dale W. Jorgenson. 1996. Toward a More Accurate Measure of the Cost of Living. Final Report to the Senate Finance Committee, December 4.
7.
Boskin, Michael J., Ellen R. Dulberger, Robert J. Gordon, Zvi Griliches, and Dale W. Jorgenson. 1998. Consumer Prices, the Consumer Price Index, and the Cost of Living. Journal of Economic Perspectives12 (1): 3-26.
8.
Bosworth, Barry P.1997. Consumer Price Index. Testimony before the Senate Finance Committee on the Consumer Price Index as a Measure of Inflation, February 11.
9.
Braithwait, Steven D.1980. Substitution Bias of the Lespeyres Price Index: An Analysis Using Estimated Cost-of-Living Indexes. American Economics Review70 (1): 64-77.
10.
Brookshire, Michael L. and Stan V. Smith. 1990. Economic/Hedonic Damages. Cincinnati, Oh.: Anderson Publishing Company.
11.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1997. Measurement Issues in the Consumer Price Index. Paper prepared in response to a letter from Rep. Jim Saxton, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, June.
12.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1998. Planned Change In the Consumer Price Index Formula. BLS Announcement, April 16.
13.
Council of Economic Advisors. 1997. Economic Report of the President. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.
14.
Deaton, Angus. 1998. Getting Prices Right: What Should Be Done?Journal of Economics Perspectives12 (1): 37-46.
15.
Deavers, Kenneth. 1997. CPI and the Myth of Decline. Investor's Business Daily, January 23.
16.
Deavers, Kenneth and Max Lyons. 1998. The Myth: Companies are Doing Well, Working Americans Falling Behind; The Fact: Gains From Economic Expansions Are Still Widely Shared. Issue Backgrounder, Employment Policy Foundation.
17.
Diewert, W. Erwin. 1998. Index Number Issues in the Consumer Price Index. Journal of Economics Perspectives12 (1): 47-58.
18.
Ehrenberg, Ronald G. and Robert S. Smith. 1994. Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Fifth Edition. New York, N.Y.: Harper Collins College Publishers.
19.
Galbraith, John K.1958. The Affluent Society. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.
20.
Gillingham, R. and W. Lane. 1982. Changing the Treatment of Shelter Costs for Homeowners in the CPI. Monthly Labor Review105 (6): 9-14.
21.
Gillingham, Robert and John S. Greenlees. 1987. The Impact of Direct Taxes on the Cost of Living. Journal of Political Economy95 (4): 775-788.
22.
Gintis, Herbert. 1972. Consumer Behavior and the Concept of Sovereignty: Explanations of Social Decay. American Economic Review62 (2): 267-278.
23.
Gordon, David M.1996. Fat and Mean: The Corporate Squeeze of Working Americans and the Myth of Managerial "Downsizing."New York, N.Y.: Martin Kessler Books.
24.
Hilday, Jeffrey and Samantha Ross. 1997. Morgan Stanley Economist, Bucking the Trend, Says He Is Convinced CPI Understates Inflation. Wall Street Journal, Eastern Edition, March 3: C15.
25.
Hulten, Charles. 1997. Quality Changes in the CPI: Some Missing Links. Challenge40 (2): 48-74.
26.
Krueger, Alan and Aaron Siskind. 1998. Using Survey Data to Assess Bias in the Consumer Price Index. Monthly Labor Review121 (4): 24-33.
27.
Manser, Marilyn E. and Richard J. McDonald. 1988. An Analysis of Substitution Bias in Measuring Inflation, 1959-85. Econometrica56 (4): 909-930.
28.
McClelland, Robert. 1996. Evaluating Formula Bias in Various Indexes Using Simulations. Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Paper 289.
29.
McKenzie, Richard B.1997. Rx for Economic Pessimism: The CPI and the Underestimation of Income Growth. Policy Study 138, St. Louis, Mo.: Center for the Study of American Business Policy Study.
30.
Moulton, Brent R.1996. Bias in the Consumer Price Index: What is the Evidence?Journal of Economic Perspectives10 (4): 159-177.
31.
Moulton, Brent R.. 1997. Issues in Measuring Price Changes for Rent of Shelter. Unpublished paper presented at the Conference on Service Sector Productivity and the Productivity Paradox, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, Ottawa, Canada, April 11-12.
32.
Moulton, Brent R. and Karin E. Moses. 1997. Addressing the Quality Change Issue in the Consumer Price Index. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity:305-366.
33.
Pollak, Robert A.1989. The Theory of the Cost-Of-Living Index. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
34.
Reinsdorf, Marshall. 1998. Formula Bias and Within-Stratum Substitution Bias in the U.S. CPI. Review of Economics and Statistics80 (2).
35.
Sen, Amartya, John Muellbauer, Ravi Kanbur, Keith Hart, Bernard Williams. 1987. The Standard of Living. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Speise, Stuart H.1988. Recovery for Wrongful Death and Injury, third edition. Rochester, N.Y.: Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company.
37.
Stein, Herbert. 1994. Presidential Economics, third revised edition. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
38.
Stigler, George J. and Gary S. Becker. 1977. De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review67 (2): 76-90.
39.
Triplett, Jack E.1971. Quality Bias in Price Indexes and New Methods of Quality Measurement. In Price Indexes and Quantity Change: Studies in New Methods of Measurement. Zvi Griliches (ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
40.
Weisskopf, Thomas E.1984. Use of Earnings Proposed to Revive Spendable Earnings Series. Monthly Labor Review107 (11): 38-43.
