In this paper, we claim that worker rights (including collective bargaining rights, employment protection, and income security) promote productivity growth. We argue that cooperative labor-management relations encourage workers to make positive contributions to technical and organizational innovations that raise labor productivity, and that an industrial relations system that secures strong worker rights fosters cooperative labor-management relations. These arguments are supported by an empirical analysis of long-run productivity growth in 15 advanced capitalist countries. We first develop an index of worker rights and show its positive effect on several indicators of labor-management cooperation. We then develop an index combining measures of worker rights and labor-management cooperation and show its positive effect on the rate of growth of labor productivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akerlof, George A.1984. Gift Exchange and Efficiency-Wage Theory: Four Views. American Economic Review74(2): 79-83.
2.
Akerlof, George A.1982. Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics97(4): 543-569.
3.
Akerlof, George A. and Janet L. Yellen. 1990. The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics105(2): 255-283.
4.
Akerlof, George A. and Janet L. Yellen (eds.). 1986. Efficiency Wage Models of the Labor Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Banks, Andy and Jack Metzgar. 1989. Participating in Management, and Critical Responses by Several Authors. Labor Research Review8(2): 1-55.
6.
Baumol, William J. and Kenneth McLennan (eds.). 1985. Productivity Growth and U.S. Competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
Blondal, Sveinbjorn and Mark Pearson. 1995. Unemployment and Other Non-employment Benefits. Oxford Review of Economic Policy11(1): 136-169.
8.
Bowles, Samuel. 1985. The Production Process in a Competitive Economy: Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian, and Marxian Models. American Economic Review75(1): 16-36.
9.
Bowles, Samuel and Richard Edwards. 1993. Understanding Capitalism: Competition, Command, and Change in the U.S. Economy (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
10.
Bowles, Samuel, David M. Gordon, and Thomas E. Weisskopf. 1991. After the Wastelanc A Democratic Economics for the Year 2000. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
11.
Bowles, Samuel, David M. Gordon, and Thomas E. Weisskopf. 1983. Beyond the Wasteland: A Democratic Alternative to Economic Decline. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
12.
Brown, Clair and Michael Reich. 1989. When Does Union-Management Cooperation Work? A Look at NUMMI and GM-Van Nuys. California Management Review31(4): 26-44.
13.
Buchele, Robert and Jens Christiansen. 1999. Employment and Productivity Growth in Europe and North America: The Impact of Labor Market Institutions. International Review of Applied Economics, Forthcoming.
14.
Buchele, Robert and Jens Christiansen. 1995. Productivity, Real Wages, and Worker Rights: A Cross-National Comparison. LABOUR: Review of Labour Economics and Industrial Relations9(3): 405-422.
15.
Buchele, Robert and Jens Christiansen. 1992. Industrial Relations and Productivity Growth: A Comparative Perspective. International Contributions to Labour Studies (2): 77-97.
16.
Bulow, Jeremy I. and Lawrence Summers. 1986. A Theory of Dual Labor Markets with Application in Industrial Policy, Discrimination, and Keynesian Unemployment. Journal of Labor EconomicsIV: 376-414.
17.
Calmfors, Lars and John Driffill. 1988. Centralization of Wage Bargaining. Economic Policy, April: 13-61.
18.
Christiansen, Jens and Michele Naples. 1986. The Social Determinants of Productivity: Evidence from the U.S., U.K., and F.R.G. In The State, Trade Unions and the Labour Market. G. Sziraczki, (ed.). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
19.
Gordon, David M.1996. Fat and Mean: The Corporate Squeeze of Working Americans and the Myth of Managerial "Downsizing."New York: The Free Press.
20.
Gordon, David M.1994a. Bosses of Different Stripes: Monitoring and Supervision across Advanced Economies. New School for Social Research, Working Papers Series.
21.
Gordon, David M.1994b. Bosses of Different Stripes: A Cross-National Perspective on Monitoring and Supervision. American Economic Review84(2): 375-379.
22.
Gordon, David M.. 1993. Generating Affluence. Dollars and Sense, Nov/Dec: 20-22.
23.
Green, Francis. 1988. Neoclassical and Marxian Conceptions of Production. Cambridge Journal of Economics12: 299-312.
24.
Green, Francis and Thomas E. Weisskopf. 1990. The Worker Discipline Effect: A Disaggregative Analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics72(2): 241-249.
25.
Hashimoto, Masanori. 1990. The Japanese Labor Market in a Comparative Perspective with the United States: A Transaction-Cost Interpretation. Kalamazoo, Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
26.
Houseman, Susan and Katherine Abraham. 1993. Female Workers as a Buffer in the Japanese Economy. American Economic Review83(2): 45-51.
27.
Kochan, Thomas A., Harry C. Katz, and Robert B. McKersie. 1986. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Lazonick, William. 1998. The Japanese Financial Crisis, Corporate Governance, and Sustainable Prosperity. The Jerome Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper No. 227
29.
Layard, Richard, Stephen Nickell, and Richard Jackman. 1991. Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Levine, David I.1995. Reinventing the Workplace: How Business and Employees Can Both WirLWashington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
31.
Lorenz, Edward H.1992. Trust and the Flexible Firm: International Comparisons. Industrial Relations31(3): 455-472.
32.
Meredith, Robyn. 1998. Many at the Saturn Auto Factory Are Finding Less to Smile About. The New York Times. March 6.
33.
O.E.C.D.Economic Outlook, various years. Paris: O.E.C.D..
34.
O.E.C.D.. Employment Outlook, various years. Paris: O.E.C.D..
35.
O.E.C.D.1994a. New Orientationsfor Social Policy. Paris: O.E.C.D.
36.
O.E.C.D.1994b. The OECD Jobs Study: Evidence and Explanations: Parts I and II. Paris: O.E.C.D.
37.
Parker, Mike and Jane Slaughter. 1988. Management by Stress. Technology Review:37-44.
38.
Patterson, Gregory A.1990. Credibility Gap: U.A.W. And Big Three Face Mutual Mistrust As Auto Talks Heat Up. The Wall Street Journal, August 29: 1.
39.
Rebitzer, James B.. 1987. Unemployment, Long-Term Employment Relations, and Productivity Growth. The Review of Economics and StatisticsVXIX: 627-635.
40.
Rogers, Joel and Wolfgang Streeck. 1994. Workplace Representation Overseas: The Works Council Story. In Working under Different Rules. Richard B. Freeman (ed.). New York: Russell Sage.
41.
Shapiro, Carl and Joseph Stiglitz. 1984. Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device. American Economic ReviewLXXIV: 433-444.
42.
Shirai, Taishiro (ed.). 1983. Contemporary Industrial Relations in Japan. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.
43.
Treece, James. 1990. Here Comes GM's Saturn. Business Week, April 9: 56-62.
44.
Turner, Lowell. 1992. Industrial Relations and the Reorganization of Work in West Germany: Lessons for the U.S. In Unions and Economic Competitiveness. Lawrence Mishel and Paula B. Voos (eds.). Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharp, Inc..
45.
Weisskopf, Thomas E.. 1987. The Effect of Unemployment on Labor Productivity: An International Comparative Analysis. International Review of Applied Economics1(2).
46.
Weisskopf, Thomas E., Samuel Bowles and David M. Gordon. 1983. Hearts and Minds: A Social Model of U.S. Productivity Growth. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2.
