It is widely accepted that the rise in U.S. wage inequality can be explained by skill-biased technological change: workplace computerization produced demand shifts that worked with a simply supply and demand "vision" of the labor market than with direct statistical evidence, which is remarkably limited. Indeed, the dominance of this elementary textbook vision has led, I argue, to a conflation between statistical facts and "theory-driven" facts-those statements about reality that are selected, interpreted, or simply created to confirm a vision of the way things work. The paper concludes by outlining an alternative explanation of the growth in wage inequality based on a sharply different, Gordonian, vision of the labor market.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akerlof, George A.1982. Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics97 (November).
2.
Akerlof, George A. and Janet L. Yellen. 1986. Efficiency Wage Models of the Labor Market. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Arnott, Richard. 1995. Time for Revisionism on Rent Control?Journal of Economic Perspectives9(1): 99-120.
4.
Atkinson, A.B. 1998. The Distribution of Income in Industrialized Countries. Paper presented at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium on Income Inequality, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August 27-29.
5.
Autor, David H., Lawrence F. Katz, and Alan B. Krueger. 1997. Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market? NBER Working Paper 5956, Cambridge, Mass.
6.
Berman, Eli, Stephen Machin, and John Bound. 1996. Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence. NBER Working Paper #6166, September, Cambridge, Mass.
7.
Berman, Eli, John Bound, and Zvi Griliches. 1994. Changes in the Demand For Skilled Labor Within U.S. Manufacturing Industries: Evidence From the Annual Survey of Manufacturing. Quarterly Journal of Economics109 (May).
8.
Bewley, Truman F.1995. A Depressed Labor Market as Explained by Participants. American Economic Review85(2) (May).
9.
Blaug, Mark. 1992. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Blaug, Mark1976. The Empirical Status of Human Capital Theory: A Slightly Jaundiced Survey. Journal of Economic Literature (June).
11.
Blanchflower, David, Andrew Oswald, and Peter Sanfey. Wages, Profits, and Rent-sharing. Quarterly Journal of Economics No. 1 (February): 227-251.
12.
Borjas, George J.1994. The Economics of Immigration. Journal of Economic Literature32 (December): 1667-1717.
13.
Bound, John, and George Johnson. 1992. Changes in the Structure of Wages in the 1980s: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations. American Economic Review82(3): 371-392.
14.
Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis. 1998. The Determinants of Individual Earnings: Cognitive Skills, Personality, and Schooling. Unpublished manuscript, April 14.
15.
Cappelli, Peter. 1993. Are Skill Requirements Rising? Evidence from Production and Clerical Jobs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review (April): 515-530.
16.
Cappelli, Peter and Nikolai Rogovsky. 1994. New Work Systems and Skill Requirements. International Labour Review46(3): 515-530.
17.
Card, David and Alan B. Krueger. 1995. Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
18.
DiNardo, John and Thomas Lemieux. 1996. Diverging Male Wage Inequality in the United States and Canada, 1981-1988: Do Unions Explain the Difference?Econometrica (Sept): 1001-1044.
19.
DiNardo, John and Jorn-Steffen Pischke. 1997. The Returns to Computer Use Revisited: Have Pencils Changed the Wage Structure Too?Quarterly Journal of Economics (February).
20.
Fortin, Nicole M. and Thomas Lemieux. 1997. Institutional Changes and Rising Wage Inequality: Is There a Linkage?Journal of Economic Perspectives11 (2): 75-96.
21.
Freeman, Richard B. and Lawrence F. Katz. 1994. Rising Wage Inequality: the United States vs. Other Advanced Countries. In Working Under Different Rules. Freeman (ed.). New York: Russell-Sage Foundation.'
22.
Galbraith, James K.1998. Created Unequal: The Crisis in American Pay. New York: Twentieth-Century Fund.
23.
Gordon, David M.1972. Theories of Poverty and Underemployment. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath and Company.
24.
Gordon, David M.. 1990. Who Bosses Whom? The Intensity of Supervision and the Discipline of Labor. American Economic Review80 (2): 28-32.
25.
Gordon, David M.. 1994a. Twixt the Cup and the Lip: Mainstream Economics and the Formation of Economic Policy. Social Research61 (1): 1-33.
26.
Gordon, David M.. 1994b. Putting Heterodox Macro to the Test: Comparing Post-Keynesian, Marxian, and Social Structuralist Macroeconometric Models of the Postwar U.S. Economy. In Competition, Technology, and Money: Comparing Classical and Post-Keynesian Views. Mark Glick and E.K. Hunt (eds.). Pp. 143-185. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar.
27.
Gordon, David M.1996. Fat and Mean: The Corporate Squeeze of Working Americans and the Myth of Managerial "Downsizing."New York: The Free Press.
28.
Gottschalk, Peter and Timothy M. Smeeding. 1997. Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality. Journal of Economic LiteratureXXXV (June): 633-687.
29.
Gottschalk, Peter. 1997. Inequality, Income Growth, and Mobility: The Basic Facts. Journal of Economic Perspectives1(2): 21-40.
30.
Glynn, Andrew. 1997. Low Pay and Employment Performance. Oxford University Working Paper.
31.
Handel, Michael J.1997. Computers and the Wage Structure. Unpublished paper, Harvard University, September.
32.
Heilbroner, Robert and William S. Milberg. 1995. The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Howell, David R.1997. Institutional Failure and the American Worker: The Collapse of Low-Skill Wages. Policy Brief No. 29, Jerome Levy Economics Institute, Bard College.
34.
Howell, David R. and Elizabeth J. Mueller. 1998. Immigration and Native-Born Male Earnings: A Jobs-Level Analysis of the New York Metropolitan Labor Market. Manuscript, New School University.
35.
Howell, David R., Margaret Duncan, and Ben Harrison. 1998. Low Wages in the U.S. and High Unemployment in Europe: A Critical Assessment of the Conventional Wisdom. Center for Economic Policy Analysis Working Paper No. 5. New School for Social Research, February.
36.
Howell, David R. and Susan Wieler. Skill-Biased Demand Shifts and the Wage Collapse in the United States: A Critical Assessment. Eastern Economic Journal24(3): 343-366.
37.
Howell, David R. and Edward N. Wolff. 1991. Trends in the Growth and Distribution of Skills in the U.S. Workplace, 1960-85. Industrial and Labor Relations Review44(3): 486-502.
38.
Howell, David R. and Edward N. Wolff. 1992. Technological Change and the Demand for Skills by U.S. Industries. Cambridge Journal of Economics16(2): 127-146.
39.
Johnson, George E.1997. Changes in Earnings Inequality: The Role of Demand Shifts. Journal of Economic Perspectives11(2): 41-54.
40.
Katz, Lawrence F., and Lawrence H. Summers. 1989. Industry Rents: Evidence and Implications. In Microeconomics: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Martin Neil Baily and Clifford Winston (eds.).
41.
Keefe, J.1991. Numerically Controlled Machine Tools and Worker Skills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review44(3).
42.
Krueger, Alan B.1993. How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence From Micro Data. Quarterly Journal of Economics (Feb.): 33-60.
43.
Krugman, Paul. 1994. Past and Prospective Causes of High Unemployment. In Reducing Unemployment: Current Issues and Policy Options. The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
44.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Machin, Stephen, Annette Ryan, and John Van Reenen. 1996. Technology and Changes in Skill Structure: Evidence from an International Panel of Industries. Discussion Paper No. 4, Centre for Economic Performance, University of Oxford (May).
46.
McCloskey, Deirdre N.1997. The Vices of Economists: The Virtues of the Bourgeoisie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
47.
Millis, Harry A. and Royal E. Montgomery. 1938. The Economics of Labor. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company (3 volumes).
48.
Mishel, Lawrence and Jared Bernstein. 1998. Technology and the Wage Structure: Has Technology's Impact Accelerated since the 1970s? Unpublished paper, Economic Policy Institute (July).
49.
OECD. 1996. Earnings Inequality, Low-Paid Employment, and Earnings Mobility. Chapter 3 of Employment Outlook (Summer): 59-108.
50.
Oliner, Stephen D. and William L. Wascher. 1995. Is Productivity Revolution Really Under Way?Challenge Magazine.
51.
Passell, Jeffrey. 1997. New York Times (March 14).
52.
Robinson, P. and M. Manacorda. Qualifications and the Labour Market in Britain, 1984-94: Skill Biased Change in the Demand for Labour or Credentialism? Discussion Paper No. 330, Center for Economic Performance, London School of Economics (February).
53.
Snower, Dennis J., 1998. Causes of Changing Earnings Inequality. Paper presented at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium on Income Inequality, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August 27-29. The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
54.
Solow, Robert M.1993. Blame the Foreigner. New York Review of Books (December 16): 7.
55.
Topel, Robert H.1997. Factor Proportions and Relative Wages: The Supply-Side Determinants of Wage Inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(2).
56.
Weisskopf, Thomas E., Samuel Bowles, and David M. Gordon. 1983. Hearts and Minds: A Social Model of U.S. Productivity Growth. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity (2): 381-441.
