An investigation of Lewis's development and use of the concept of surplus and a comparison of it with Marx's surplus value shows that this attempt to update Marxian theory with mainstream concepts was unsuccessful. Marginal productivity theory and Marx's theory of surplus value cannot be consistently developed within Lewis's analysis. Still Lewis's approach, employing classical economics from Smith to Marx, is of value to radical political economists in undeveloped capitalist economies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baran, P.1953. Economic Progress and Economic Surplus. Science and Society17 (Fall): 289-317.
2.
Baran, P.1957. The Political Economy of Growth. New York: Monthly Review.
3.
Barclay, W.A.
and M. Stengel. 1975. Surplus and Surplus-Value. Review of Radical Political Economics7(4): 48-64.
4.
Bernal, R.
, M. Figueroa and M. Witter. 1984. Caribbean Economic Thought: The Critical Tradition. Social and Economic Studies33(2): 5-87.
5.
Best, L.1991. George Beckford and the Caribbean. Trinidad and Tobago Review13(10) (October/November).
6.
Best, L.
and K. Levitt. 1969. Externally Propelled Growth and Industrialization. 3 Vols. Montreal: McGill University.
7.
Birchenhall. C.
and P. Grout. 1984. Mathematicsfor Modern Economics. New York: Phillip Allen.
8.
Bohm-Bawerk, E. von
. 1898. The Positive Theory of Capital. New York: Stechert (ed. W. Smart, 1891).
9.
Bohm-Bawerk, E. von
. 1890. Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economic Theory. New York: Augustus M. Kelley (ed. W. Smart, 1970).
10.
Bohm-Bawerk, E. von
. 1888. Karl Marx and the close of his system. In, Karl Marx and the close of his system (E. von Bohm-Bawerk) and Bohm-Bawerk's criticism of Marx (R. Hilferding) with an appendir by L. von Bortliewica, P. Sweezy (ed.). New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1949.
11.
Cumper, G.E.1974. Dependence, Development and the Sociology of Economic Thought. Social and Economic Studies23(3) (September).
12.
Dobb, M.1973. Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith. Cambridge University Press.
13.
Garegnani, P.1966. Switching of Techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics80: 554-567.
14.
Garegnani, P.
. 1970. Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution. Review of Economic Studies37(3): 407-436; 439.
15.
Howard, M.1983. Profits in Economic Theory. London: Macmillan.
16.
Leontief, W.W.1951. The Structure of American Economy 1919-1939. Fair Lawn, NJ: Oxford.
17.
Lewis, W.A.1954. Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester School of Economic and Social StudiesXXII(2): 139-191.
18.
Lewis, W.A.
. 1958. Unlimited Labor: Further Notes. The Manchester School26(1): 1-32.
19.
Lewis, W.A.
. 1972. Reflections on Unlimited Labor. In, International Economics and Development (Essays in Honour of Raoul Prebisch), L. E deMarco (ed.), pp. 75-96. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Lewis, W.A.
. 1976. Development and Distribution. In, Income, Employment and Development Strategy, A. Cairncross and M. Puri (eds.) pp. 26-42. London: Macmillan,
21.
Lewis, W.A.
. 1979. The Dual Economy Revisited. Manchester SchoolXLVII(3).
22.
Lewis, W.A.
. 1980. Autobiographical Note. Social and Economic Studies29(4): 1-4.
23.
Lewis, W.A.
. 1984. The State of Development Theory. American Economic Review74(1): 1-10.
24.
Lippit, V.D.1985. The Concept of the Surplus in Economic Development. Review of Radical Political Economics17(1&2): 1-19.
25.
Marx, K.1967. Capital: Vol. 1, A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production. New York: International Publishers.
26.
Meiksins, P.1981. Productive and Unproductive labor and Marx's Theory of Class. Review of Radical Political Economics13(3): 32-42.
27.
Nell, E.J.1967. Theories of Growth and Theories of Value. Economic Development and Cultural Change16: 15-26.
28.
Nell, E.J.
. 1970. A Note on Cambridge Controversies in Capital Theory. Journal of Economic Literature8: 41-44.
29.
Nell, E.J.
. 1983. On Monetary Circulation and the Rate of Exploitation. Economic Forum12(1).
30.
Nell, E.J.
. 1984. Understandingthe Marxian Notion of Exploitation: The Number One Issue. In, Samuelson and Neoclassical Economists, George Feiwel (ed.). Boston: Kluwer Nijoff.
31.
Pasinetti, L.1966. Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics80: 503-517.
32.
Pasinetti, L.
. 1969. Switches of Technique and the "Rate of Return" in Capital Theory. Economic Journal79: 508-531.
33.
Samuelson, P.1962. Parable in Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function. Review of Economic Studies39: 193-206.
34.
Samuelson, P.
. 1966. A Summing Up. Quarterly Journal of Economics80: 568-583.
35.
Samuelson, P.
. 1971. Understandingthe Marxian Notion of Exploitation: A Summary of the So-Called Transformation Problem between Marxian Values and Competitive Prices. Journal of Economic Literature9(2): 399-431.
36.
Smart, W.1970. Translator's Preface to Bohm-Bawerk, Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economic Theory (1890). New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
37.
Shaikh, A.1974. Marx's Theory of Value and the "Transformation Problem." Unpublished Paper, New School For Social Research.
38.
Sraffa, P.1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
St. Cyr, E.B.A.1980. On Lewis' Theory of Growth and Development. Social and Economic Studies29(4): 16-26.
40.
Szlajfer, H.1983. Economic Surplus and Surplus Value: An Attempt at Comparison. Review of Radical Political Economy15(1): 107-130.
41.
Walsh, V
and H. Gram. 1980. Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium. New York: Oxford.
42.
Weisskopf, T.
, S. Bowles, and D. Gordon. 1983. Hearts and Minds: A Social Model of U.S. Productivity Growth. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2: 381-450.
