This paper is a defense of the worker-control model of market socialism. Criticizing a recent argument by N. Scott Arnold, I show that he failed to demonstrate that, in the worker-control model of market socialism, workers are bound to lose the right to a share in the firm's income.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, N. Scott
. 1987a. Marx and Disequilibrium in Market Socialist Relations of Production. Economics and Philosophy3: 2348.
2.
Arnold, N. Scott
. 1987b. Further Thoughts on the Degenerationof Market Socialism. Economics and Philosophy3: 320-330.
3.
Arnold, N. Scott
. 1987c. Final Reply to Professor Schweickart. Economics and Philosophy3: 335-338.
4.
Arnold, N. Scott
. 1988. Reply to Professor Putterman. Economics and Philosophy4: 337-340.
5.
Arnold, N. Scott
. 1989. Marx, Central Planning, and Utopian Socialism. Social Philosophy and Policy6 (2): 160-199.
6.
Arnold, N. Scott
. 1990. Marx's Radical Citique of Capitalist Society. NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
Buchanan, Allen
. 1985. Ethics, Efficiency and the Market. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
8.
Joyce, Joseph P.1988. The Economic Activities of Business. Westport, CT: Praeger.
9.
Lavoie, Don
. 1985. Rivalry and Central Planning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Lippincott, Benjamin E.
(ed.). 1964. On the Economic Theory of Socialism. NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
11.
Putterman, Louis
. 1988. Marx and Disequilibrium. Economics and Philosophy4: 333-336.
12.
Schweickart, David
. 1987a. Market Socialist Capitalist Roaders. Economics and Philosophy3: 308-319.
13.
Utten, M. A.1982. The Political Economy of Big Business. NY: St. Martin's Press.
