Technical and Organizational Progress and the Turnover of Capital

Abstract

First, this paper presents three different points of view on the long-run impact of technical and organizational progress on the time structure of production and circulation and thereby on the rate of capital turnover. Two of these approaches are Marxian (Hilferding and Andreff), one is Neo-Austrian (v. Weizsicker) but can easily be translated into a Marxian framework. Moreover, these expectations are confronted with empirical evidence on the rate of capital turnover in the U.S. manufacturing sector. Taking account of inflation and the effect of the business cycle, the results of the empirical analysis are not straightforward but suggest diverging development paths for the 21 industries under study. Still, during the '70s U.S. manufacturing companies seem to have in general succeeded in accelerating capital turnover by improving the time structure of production and circulation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreff, W. 1976. Profits et structures du capitalism mondial. Paris: Calmann-Levy.

Andreff, W. . 1979. Technische Formen und A bumdaonsweisen des Kapilals - Neuc Theonen in der internatonakn Diskussion. Frankfiurt, New York: Campus.

Eichner, A.S. 1985. Toward a new economics. Essays in post-Keynesian and insutituonalist theory. Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe.

Foley, D. 1986. Money, accumulation and crisis, Fundamentals ofpure and applied economics. Vol. 2. Chur etc. Harwood Academic Publishers.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Haass, J. 1987. Multnadionak Unternehmen und Internatonaler Handel. Das Auslandskapital in Norwegen und Schweden. Frankfurt, New York Campus.

Haass, J. . 1988. The time-consuming character of the production process and aggregate measures of productivity. Paper presented at URPE at the 1988 ASSA Convention.

Hicks, J. 1973a. Capital and time. A neo-Austrian theory. Oxford Oxford University Press.

Hicks, J. . 1973b. The Austrian theory of capital and its rebirth in modern economics. In, Carl Menger and the Austrian school of economics, J. Hicks , and W. Weber (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

10.

Hicks, J. . 1976a. Some questions of time in economics. In, Evolution, welfare and time in economics. Essays in honor of Georgescu-Roegen. Tang, Westfield, Werley (eds.). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

11.

Hicks, J. . 1976b. Is interest the price of a factor of production? In, Time, Uncertainty, and Disequilibrium. Exploration of Austrian Themes. M. J.Rizzo (ed.), Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

12.

Hicks, J. . 1985. Methods of dynamic economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Hilferding, R. [1910/1981]. Finance capital. A study of the latest phase of capitalist development. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

14.

Lange, O. 1936. The place of interest in the theory of production, Review of Economic Studies, 3: 159-192.

15.

Leontief, W. 1934. Interest on capital and distribution: A problem in the theory of marginal productivity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, XLIV: 147-161.

16.

Marx, K. [1867] 1967. Capital Vol. 1. New York International Publishers.

17.

Marx, K. . [1885] 1967. Capital Vol. 2. New York International Publishers.

18.

Marx, K. . [1894] 1967. Capital Vol. 3 New York International Publishers.

19.

Stalk, G. 1988. Time - The next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review July-August, 41-51.

20.

Vickers, D. 1987. Money capital in the theory of the firm. A preliminary analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Weizsicker, C.C. von 1971. Die zeidiche Strukur des Pruionsprozesses und das Problem der Einkommensverteilung zwischen Kapital und Arbeit. with an English summary. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. CVI, 1-33.

22.

Winston, G.C. 1982. The timing of economic activity. Finns, households, and markets, and time-specific analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.