This study develops and tests a two-part reproduction model of sex segregation and relative wage determination where both are hypothesized to be related to the technology or input requirements of production in ways that can account, in large part, for persistent wage inequality by gender. An analysis of occupational sex composition and relative wages in 33 manufacturing industries from the early 1960s to the late 1970s shows that women were and remained disproportionately employed in labor-intensive occupations and industries and that these technical conditions were associated with low earnings, independently of skills. The findings suggest that, once wage disparities by sex are established, the market forces of capitalism will continually resegregate women into jobs where, because of the lack of intrinsic bargaining power and disproportionate vulnerability to job loss, workers are unable to achieve wages commensurate with skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cartter, Allan M.1975. Theory of Wages and Employment. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
2.
Chamberlain, Neil
. 1955. A General Theory of Economic Process. New York: Harper and Row.
3.
Cockburn, Cynthia
. 1988. Machinery of Dominance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
4.
Corcoran, Mary E.1979. Work Experience, Labor Force Withdrawals and Women's Wages: Empirical Results Using the 1976 Panel of Income Dynamics. In, Women in the Labor Market. C. Lloyd, E. Andrews, and C. Gilroy (eds.) pp. 216-245. New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
Doeringer P.
and M. Piore. 1971. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, Mass.: Heath.
6.
Dunlop, John T.1957. The Theory of Wage Detennination. New York: St. Martin's Press.
7.
Elson, Diane
, and Ruth Pearson. 1981. Nimble Fingers Make Cheap workers: An Analysis of Women's Employment in Third World Export Manufacturing. Feminist Review Spring, pp. 87-106.
8.
England, Paula
. 1984. Socioeconomic Explanations of Job Segregation. In, Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination. Remick, Helen (ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
9.
England, Paula
. Marilyn Chassie, and Linda McCormack. 1982. Skill Demands and Earnings in Female and Male Occupations. Sociology and Social Research, January, pp. 147-168.
10.
Freeman, Richard B.
and James L. Medoff. 1982. Substitution between Production Labor and Other Inputs in Unionized and Nonunionized Manufacturing. Review of Economics and Statistics, May, pp. 220-233.
11.
Gordon, David M.
, Richard Edwards and Michael Reich. 1982. Segmented Work, Divided Workers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Haddad, Carol J.1987. Technology, Industrialization and the Economic Status of Women. In, Women, Work and Technology. B. Wright (ed.). pp. 33-57. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13.
Hammermesh, Daniel S.
and Albert Rees. 1982. The Economics of Work and Pay. New York: Harper and Row, 3rd Ed.
14.
Hicks, John R.1964. The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan, 2nd Ed.
15.
Howell, David.1982. Production Technology, Job Skills and Relative Industry Wages. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, New School for Social Research.
16.
Marshall, Alfred
.1964. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan, 8th Ed.
17.
Marx, Karl
. 1967. Capital, Vol. 1. New York: International Publishers.
18.
McGaw, J.1982. Women and the History of American Technology. Signs, Vol.7, No. 4, Summer, pp. 798-828.
19.
Mincer, Jacob
and Solomon Polachek. 1980. Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women. In, The Economics of Women's Work. Alice Amsden (ed.). pp. 169-205. New York: Penguin Books.
20.
Nash, June
and Maria P. Fernandez-Kelly (eds.). 1983. Women, Men and the International Division of Labor. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
National Advisory Council on Economic Opportunity
. 1980. Critical Choices for the 80s. 12th Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, August.
22.
North-South Institute
. 1985. Women in Industry: North-South Connections. Ottawa: North-South Institute.
23.
Oster, G.1979. Factor-Analytic Test of the Theory of Dual Economy. Review of Economics and Statistics. No. 62, March, pp. 33-39.
24.
Reder, Melvin
. 1968. The Theory of Occupational Wage Differentials. In, The Labor Market. B. McCormick and E. Smith (eds.). pp. 203-227. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
25.
Remick, Helen
, Ed. 1984. Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sorensen, Elaine
. 1982. An Economics Analysis of Comparable Worth. New Labor Review, Fall, pp. 19-33.
28.
Sorensen, Elaine
. 1989. Measuring the Effect of Occupational Sex and Race Composition on Earnings. In, Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries. Robert Michael, Heidi I. Hartmann & Brigid O'Farrell (eds.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
29.
Tilly, Louise
and Joan Scott. 1978. Women, Work and Family. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
30.
Treiman, Donald J.1979. Job Evaluation: An Analytic Review. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
31.
Treiman, Donald J.
and Heidi I.Hartmann (eds.). 1981. Women, Work, and Wages. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
32.
Treiman, Donald J.
, Heidi I.Hartmann and Patricia A.Roos. 1984. Assessing Pay Discrimination Using National Data. In, Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination. Helen Remick (ed.). pp. 79-89. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
Wertheimer, Barbara
. 1977. We Were There. New York: Pantheon Books.
34.
Willis, Norman D. & Associates
. 1976. State of Washington Comparable Worth Study. Norman D. Willis & Associates, Management Consultants, Phase Two, December.
