Principles of economics texts not only reveal the essential elements of orthodox economic theorizing, but they also contain an ideological message and are intended to explain economic reality. This paper summarizes major criticisms of such texts, showing that they are poorly equipped to explain reality. It concludes by suggesting a more meaningful approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnet, Richard J.
, and Ronald E. Muller. 1974. Global Reach. New York: Simon & Schuster.
2.
Cherry, Robert
. 1975. The Ideological Bias of Traditional Theory. Review of Radical Political Economics6(4):10-19.
3.
Gregg, Pauline
. 1976. Black Death to Industrial Revolution. New York: Barnes & Noble Books.
4.
Harcourt, G. C.1972. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge University Press.
5.
Kalecki, Michal
. 1971. Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist System. Cambridge University Press.
6.
McConnell, Campbell
. 1981. Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Markusen, Anne
. 1977. Feminist Notes on Introductory Economics. Review of Radical Political Economics9(3):1-6.
8.
Marx, Karl
. 1967. Capital. Vol. 1. New York: International Publishers.
9.
Meeropol, Michael
. 1975. A Radical Teaching a Straight Principles of Economics Course. Review of Radical Political Economics6(4):2-9.
10.
Nell, E. J.1972. The Revival of Political Economy. Social Research39(l):32-52.
11.
Nell, E. J.1980. Capital and the Firm in Neoclassical Theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics11(4):494-508.
12.
Polanyi, Karl
. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Beacon Press.
13.
Rider, Christine
. 1982. Trade Theory Irrelevance. Journal of Post Keynesian EconomicsIV(4):594-601.
14.
Samuelson, Paul
. 1980. Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Sweezy, Paul
. 1970. Toward a Critique of Economics. Monthly Review21(8):1-9.
16.
Tawney, R. H.1926. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
