This paper asserts the importance for radicals of stripping neoclassical economics of its apparent empiricist bases. It exemplifies this by presenting the results of a comprehensive review of the literature of the Permanent Income and Life Cycle Hypotheses. It concludes that tests fail to show their empirical superiority over alternative theories. The reason for their popularity is their implicit ideological function as part of the support for the neoclassical paradigm.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, N.1971. Dependency Rates and Savings Rates: Comment. American Economic Review61(2):472-475.
2.
Anderson, P. R. 1967. Discretionary and Contractual Saving in Canada:A Cross Sectional Study. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University.
3.
Ando, A.
and Modigliani, F.1963. The "Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving. American Economic Review53(1):55-84.
4.
Barfield, R.
and Morgan, J.1974. Early Retirement: The Decision and the Experience: A Second Look. University of Michigan, Survey Resource Center.
5.
Bilson, J. F. O.1980. The Permanent Income Hypothesis Under Rational Expectations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics62(2):319-324.
6.
Biorn, E.1980. The Consumption Function and the Life Cycle Hypothesis: An Analysis of Norwegian Household Data. Scandinavian Journal of Economics82(4):464-480.
7.
Brown, T. M.1952. Habit Persistence and Lags in Consumer Behavior. Econometrica20(3):355-371.
8.
Busch, G.
and Wuger, M.1981. Social Security and Saving: A Critical Note on the Feldstein Hypothesis. Empirica2:223-240.
9.
Cagan, P.1965. The Effect of Pension Plans on Aggregate Saving. National Bureau of Economic Research, Occasional Paper 95.
10.
Claycamp, H. J.1963. The Composition of ConsumerSavingsPorffolios. Urbana, Illinois, Bureau of Economic Research, University of Illinois.
11.
Clower, R.
and Johnson, M.1968. Income, Wealth and the Theory of Consumption. In, Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks, Wolfe (ed.). Edinburgh: The University Press.
12.
Cuddington, J. T.1982. Canadian Evidence on the Permanent Income-Rational Expectations Hypothesis. The Canadian Journal of EconomicsXV(2):331-335.
13.
Daly, V.
and Hadjimatheou, G.1981. Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Evidence for the United Kingdom Economy. Journal of Political Economy89:596-599.
14.
Danziger, S.
, J. Van der Gaag, E. Smolensky and M. K. Taussig. 1982-3. The Life-Cycle Hypothesis and the Consumption Behavior of the Elderly. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, V(2):208-227.
15.
Darby, M.1972. The Allocation of Transitory Income Among Consumers' Assets. American Economic Review62:928-941.
16.
Darby, M.1974. The Permanent Income Theory: A Restatement. Quarterly Journal of Economics88:228-250.
17.
Davidson, J.
, D. Hendry, F. Srba and S. Yeo. 1978. Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship Between Consumers' Expenditure and Income in the United Kingdom. Economic Journal88:661-692.
18.
Davidson, J.
and D. Hendry. 1981. Interpreting Econometric Evidence: The Behavior of Consumers' Expenditure in the United Kingdom. European Economic Review16:177-192.
19.
Duesenberry, J.1949. Income, Saving and the Theory of ConsumerBehavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
20.
Eisner, R.1958. The Permanent Income Hypothesis: Comment. American Economic Review48(5):972-990.
21.
Eisner, R.1969. Fiscal and Monetary Policy Reconsidered. American Economic Review59(5):897-905.
22.
Farrell, M.1959. The New Theories of the Consumption Function. Economic Journal69:678-695.
23.
Feldstein, M.1974. Social Security, Induced Retirement and Aggregate Capital Formation. Journal of Political Economy82(5):905-926.
24.
Fisher, I.1930. The Theory of Interest. New York: Macmillan.
25.
Friedman, M.1957. A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
Green, F. 1979a. The Neo-Fisherian Theories of Saving: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Birkbeck College, London University.
27.
Green, F.1979b. The Consumption Function: A Study of a Failure in Positive Economics. In, Issues in Political Economy: A Critical Approach, Green. F. and P. Nore (eds.). London: Macmillan.
28.
Green, F.1980. A Note on the Overestimated Importance of the Constant U.S. Savings Ratio. Southern Economic Journal47(2):510-516.
29.
Green, F.1981. The Effect of Occupational Pension Schemes on Saving in the United Kingdom: A Test of the Life Cycle Hypothesis. Economic Journal91:136-144.
30.
Gupta, K.1971. Dependency Rates and Savings Rates. American Economic Review61:886-896.
31.
Gustman and Stafford
. 1972. Income Expectations and the Consumption of Graduate Students. Journal of Political Economy80:1246-1258.
32.
Hall, R. E.1978. Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle Hypotheses: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Political Economy86(6):971-987.
33.
Hayashi, F.1982. The Permanent Income Hypothesis: Estimation and Testing by Instrumental Variables. Journal of Political Economy90(5): 895-916.
34.
Heckman
. 1974. Life-Cycle Consumption and Labor Supply. American Economic Review64(1):188-194.
35.
Hemmings, R.
and R. Harvey. 1983. Occupational Pension Scheme Membership and Retirement Saving. Economic Journal93:128-144.
36.
Howard, D. H.1978. Personal Saving and the Rate of Inflation. Review of Economics and Statistics60(4):547-554.
37.
Katona, G.1965. Private Pensions and Individual Saving. Monograph No. 40, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.
38.
Leff, N.1969. Dependence Rates and Savings Rates. American Economic Review59:886-896.
Marglin, S.1975. What Do Bosses Do? Part 2. Review of Radical Political Economics7(1):20-37.
41.
Mayer, T.1972. Permanent Income, Wealth and Consumption: A Critique of the Permanent Income Theory. The Life-Cycle Hypothesis and Related Theories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
Mayer, T.1980. Economics as a Hard Science: Realistic Goal or Wishful Thinking?Economic Inquiry18:165-178.
43.
Modigliani, F.1966. The Life Cycle Hypothesis of Saving, the Demand for Wealth and the Supply of Capital. Social Research33(2):160-217.
44.
Modigliani, F.1970. The Life Cycle Hypothesis of Saving and Inter-Country Differences in the Saving Ratio. In, Induction, Growth and Trade. Essays in Honour of SirRoy Harrod, Ellis, W. and J. Wolfe (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
45.
Modigliani, F.
and R. Brumberg. 1954. Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data. In, Post Keynesian Economics, K. Kurihara, (ed.). London: Allen and Unwin.
46.
Mohun, S.1977. Consumer Sovereignty. In, Economics: An Antitext, Francis Green and Petter Nore (eds.). London: Macmillan.
47.
Morgan, J.1964. An Analysis of Expenditure and Saving. In, ConsumptionBehavior ofIndividual Families over Two and Three Years, R. Kosobud and J. Morgan (eds.). University of Michigan, Survey Research Center.
48.
Munnell, A. 1973. The Effect of Social Security on Personal Savings. Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University.
49.
Munnell, A.1976. Private Pensions and Saving: New Evidence. Journal of Political Economy84(5):1013-1032.
50.
Muth, J. F.1960. Optimal Properties of Exponentially Weighted Forecasts. Journal of the American Statistical Association55:299-306.
51.
Nagatani, K.1972. Life-Cycle Saving: Theory and Fact. American Economic Review62(3):344-354.
52.
Nerlove, M.1958. The Implications of Friedman's Permanent Income Hypothesis for Demand Analysis: A Review. Agricultural Economics ResearchXX:21-36.
53.
Odling-Smee, J.1973. Personal Savings Revisited: More Statistics, Fewer Facts. Bulletin of the Oxford Institute of Economics and Statistics33(1):21-29.
54.
Patinkin, D.1965. Money, Interest and Prices. New York: Harper and Row.
55.
Projector, D.1968. Survey of Changes in Family Finances. Washington, D.C., Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System.
56.
Reid
and Dunsing. 1956. Effect of Variability of Incomes on Level of Income: Expenditure Curves of Farm Families. Review of Economics and Statistics38(l):90-95.
57.
Sargan, J. D.1957. The Danger of Over Simplification. Bulletin of the Oxford Institute of Economics and Statistics19(2):171-178.
58.
Sargeant, T. J.1977. Observations on Improper Methods of Simulating and Teaching Friedman's Time Series Consumption Model. International Economic Review18:445-462.
59.
Sargeant, T. J.1978. Rational Expectations, Econometric Exogeneity, and Consumption. Journal of Political Economy86(4):673-700.
60.
Schoeplin, R.1970. The Effect of Pension Plans on Other Retirement Saving. Journal of Finance25(3):633-638.
61.
Söderstrom, L.1982. The Life Cycle Hypothesis and Aggregate Household Saving. American Economic Review72(3):590-596.
62.
Sommermeijer, W.
and R. Bannink. 1973. A Consumption-Savings Model and Its Application. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
63.
Taubman, P.1968. Personal Saving: A Time Series Analysis of Three Measures of the Same Conceptual Series. Review of Economics and Statistics50(1):125-129.
64.
Thurow, L.1969. The Optimum Lifetime Distribution of Consumption Expenditures. American Economic Review59(3):324-330.
65.
Tobin, J.1967. Life Cycle Saving and Balanced Growth. In, TenEconomicStudies in the Tradition of Irving Fisher, W. J. Fellner and others: New York: Wiley.
66.
Walters, A. A.1970. An Introduction to Econometrics, 2nd ed., London: Macmillan.
67.
Watts, H.1958. Long-Run Income Expectations and Consumer Saving. In, Studies in Household Economic Behavior, Rosett and Watts (eds.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
68.
White, B. B.1978. Empirical Tests of the Life Cycle Hypothesis. American Economic Review68(4):547-560.
