Abstract
Orthodox expenditure and fiscal incidence studies seem to be ob jective analyses of the budgetary impact of the public sector; they are, in fact, based on an important assumption about the State, which, when changed, also significantly changes the results of these studies. This article summarizes a com parison of an orthodox model and a radical model and finds support for the con tention that orthodox incidence studies mystify the purpose and impact of gov ernment budgets.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
