The paper contributes to the ongoing debates on capitalist climate governance by drawing from a case study of Gilgit Baltistan (GB), Pakistan. The article underscores what has been largely ignored by economists, namely, that agroecological farming practices of small peasants offer useful insights for sustainable climate governance because they are rooted in a holistic conceptualization of nature that transcends the ontological separation between human and nonhuman nature. Further, it illustrates that a meaningful analysis of climate governance in the Global South should be grounded in the historical and localized socio-institutional milieu. As the power balance between capitalists and the local community has steadily shifted against the latter, climate governance has degenerated into green grabbing and carbon colonialism. This climate governance regime has undermined both the agroecological livelihoods of small peasant communities and environmental sustainability in GB.
Akram-LodhiHaroon. 2015. Accelerating towards food sovereignty. Third World Quarterly36 (3): 563–83.
3.
Akram-LodhiHaroon. 2021. The ties that bind? Agroecology and the agrarian question in the twenty-first century. Journal of Peasant Studies48 (4): 687–714.
4.
AliNousheen2019. Delusional States: Feeling Rule and Development in Pakistan’s Northern Frontier. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AliInayatButzDavid. 2005. Report on Shimshal Nature Trust (SNT), Ghojal, Northern Areas, Pakistan. In Governance Stream of the Fifth World Parks Congress, ed. PanskyDiane. Ottawa: Parks Canada and IUCN/WCPA.
6.
BaimanRon. 2001. Why equity cannot be separated from efficiency: The welfare economics of progressive social pricing. Review of Radical Political Economics33 (2): 203–21.
7.
BaimanRon. 2002. Why equity cannot be separated from efficiency II: When should social pricing be progressive?Review of Radical Political Economics34 (3): 311–17.
8.
BaimanRon. 2016. The Morality of Radical Economics: Ghost Curve Ideology and the Value Neutral Aspect of Neoclassical Economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
9.
BaimanRon. 2021. In support of a renewable energy and materials economy: A Global Green New Deal that includes Arctic Sea ice triage and carbon cycle restoration. Review of Radical Political Economics53 (4): 611–22.
10.
BaimanRon. 2022. Our two climate crises challenge: Short-run emergency direct climate cooling and long-run GHG removal and ecological regeneration. Review of Radical Political Economics54 (4): 435–51.
11.
BlancGuillaume. 2022. The Invention of Green Colonialism, trans. Helen Morrison. New York: Polity Press.
12.
BorrasSaturnino M.ScoonesIanBaviskarAmitvaEdelmanMarcPelusoNancy L.WolfordWendy. 2022. Climate change and agrarian struggles: An invitation to contribute to a JPS forum. Journal of Peasant Studies49 (1): 1–28.
13.
BoyceJames. 2002. The Political Economy of the Environment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
BurkettPaul. 1999. Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
16.
BuscherBramSullivanSianNevesKatjaIgoeJimBrockingtonDan. 2012. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism23 (2): 4–30.
17.
BrockingtonDanDufyRosaleen. 2010. Capitalism and conservation: The production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode42 (3): 469–84.
18.
CalelRaphaelDechezleprêtreAntoine. 2016. Environmental policy and directed technological change: Evidence from the European carbon market. Review of Economics and Statistics98 (1): 173–91.
19.
CastreeNoel. 2003. Commodifying what nature?Progress in Human Geography27 (3): 273–97.
20.
CavanaghConnorBenjaminsenTor. 2014. Virtual nature, violent accumulation: The “spectacular failure” of carbon offsetting at a Ugandan national park. Geoforum56 (1): 55–65.
21.
CPEC Secretariat. 2025. Energy Projects Under CPEC. Islamabad: Ministry of Planning, Development, and Special Initiatives. Accessed at: https://cpec.gov.pk/energy.
GB-EPA (Gilgit-Baltistan Environmental Protection Agency). 2017. Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan. Gilgit-Baltistan: Government of Gilgit-Baltistan.
29.
GrilichesZvi. 1960. Are farmers irrational?Journal of Political Economics68 (1): 68–71.
30.
HahnelRobin. 2012. Left clouds over climate change policy. Review of Radical Political Economics44 (2): 141–59.
31.
HahnelRobin. 2015. Response to Lipow on climate change policy. Review of Radical Political Economics47 (3): 460–64.
32.
HickelJason. 2018. Is it possible to achieve a good life for all within planetary boundaries?Third World Quarterly40 (1): 18–35.
33.
Holt-GiménezEricShattuckAnnieLammerenIljan. 2021. Thresholds of resistance: Agroecology, resilience, and the agrarian question. Journal of Peasant Studies48 (4): 715–33.
KarrarH. Hasan. 2019. In the shadow of the silk road: Border regimes and economic corridor development through an unremarkable Pakistan-China border market. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East39 (3): 389–406.
36.
KarrarH. Hasan. 2021. Caravan trade to neoliberal spaces: Fifty years of Pakistan-China connectivity across the Karakoram mountains. Modern Asian Studies55 (3): 867–901.
37.
KeenSteve. 2022. The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change. Globalization18 (7): 1149–77.
38.
KenisAnneleenLievensMatthias. 2015. Greening the economy or economizing the green project? When environmental concerns are turned into a means to save the market. Review of Radical Political Economics48 (2): 217–34.
KhanDanish. 2021. Political economy of uneven state-spatiality: Conflict, class, and institutions in postcolonial state of Pakistan. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture and Society33 (1): 52–70.
41.
KhanDanish. 2022. Political economy of expulsionary urbanization: Subsumption and estrangement of spaces in Pakistan. Review of Radical Political Economics54 (4): 461–78.
42.
KhanDanish. 2023. Political economy of the “informal” housing question: Institutional hybridity of the postcolonial state. Review of International Political Economy30 (6): 2052–68.
43.
KhanDanish. 2024. Political economy of the “agrarian-urban frontier” in Pakistan: Agrarian transformation, social reproduction, and exploitation. Journal of Agrarian Change24 (3). Accessed at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.12582.
44.
KhanDanishAkhtarAasim. S.2022. Transforming a praetorian polity: The political economy of democratization in Pakistan. Canadian Journal of Development Studies43 (3): 320–38.
45.
LiMinqi. 2021. Profit, Accumulation, and Crisis in Capitalism: Long-term Trends in the UK, US, Japan, and China, 1855–2018. London: Routledge.
46.
LipowGar. 2015. Shutting down the fog machine. Review of Radical Political Economics47 (2): 231–42.
47.
LohmannLarry. 2012. Financialization, commodification, and carbon: The contradictions of neoliberal climate policy. Socialist Register48 (85): 85–107.
48.
MacKenzieJohn. 1988. The Empire of Nature: Hunting, Conservation, and British Imperialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
49.
MasonR. Joseph. 2018. Financial regulation and fraud in CO2 markets. In Research Handbook of Investing in the Triple Bottom Line: Finance, Society and the Environment, eds. BoubakerSabriCummingDouglasNguyenDoc K.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
50.
MooreJason. 2017. The capitalocene, part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. Journal of Peasant Studies44 (3): 594–630.
51.
Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group. 2015. Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nature Climate Change5 (1): 424–30.
52.
MoyoSamJhaPraveenYerosParis. 2013. The classical agrarian question: Myth, reality, and relevance today. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy2 (1): 93–119.
53.
NaiduSrisha. 2021. Conservation as economic imperialism. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism, eds. NessImmanuelCopeZak. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
54.
NordhausWilliam. 2008. A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
PiovaniChiaraLiMinqi. 2013. Climate change and the limits to the growth-oriented model of development: The Case of China and India. Review of Radical Political Economics45 (4): 449–55.
