Despite women being increasingly engaged in labor-platform activities, little of the research conducted on this topic to date has included a feminist perspective. However, the platform economy has direct impacts on the social organization of social reproduction and is changing the main dimensions of the world of work with crucial gendered effects. This study deploys a feminist political economics approach to assess the impacts of digital labor platforms on the reconfiguration and regeneration of intersectional inequalities. The findings of this analysis of digital platforms in the care sector in Spain reveal how they profit from regulatory contexts that perpetuate existing gender, race, and migrant status inequalities, as well as labor market vulnerability, with migrant women segregated into lower-paid and more insecure jobs.
BaglioniElenaCamplingLiamMezzadriAlessandraMiyamuraSatoshiPattendenJonathanSelwynBenjamin. 2022. Exploitation and labour regimes: Production, circulation, social reproduction, ecology. In Labour Regimes and Global Production, eds. Elena BaglioniCamplingLiamCoeNeil M.SmithAdrian, 81–100. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Agenda.
2.
BakkerIsabella. 2007. Social reproduction and the constitution of a gendered political economy. New Political Economy12 (4): 541–56.
CioffiJohn W.KenneyMartin F.ZysmanJohn. 2022. Platform power and regulatory politics: Polanyi for the twenty-first century. New Political Economy27 (5): 820–36.
5.
Comisiones Obreras. 2022. El Impacto de los Fondos Buitre en el Sector de la Dependencia en Navarra. Pamplona, Spain: Comisiones Obreras.
European Commission. 2021. Long-term Care Report. Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities in an Aging Society, volumes 1 and 2. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Accessed at: https://op.europa.eu/s/xLZ7.
8.
FraserNancy. 2014. Can society be commodities all the way down? Post-Polanyian reflections on capitalist crisis. Economy and Society43 (4): 541–58.
9.
HuntAbigailSammanEmmaTapfumaSherryMwauraGraceOmenyaRhodaKayKimStevanoSaraRoumerAida. 2019. Women in the Gig Economy: Paid Work, Care and Flexibility in Kenya and South Africa. London: Overseas Development Institute and Data Pop Alliance. Accessed at: https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/women_in_the_gig_economy_final_digital.pdf.
MarčetaPetar. 2021. Platform capitalism—towards the neo-commodification of labour? In Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism, eds. JulietaHaidarKeuneMaarten, 69–91. London: Elgar online.
14.
MateescuAlexandraTiconaJulia. 2020. Invisible work, visible workers. Visibility regimes in online platforms for domestic work. In Beyond the Algorithm. Qualitative Insights for Gig Work Regulation, ed. AcevedoDeepa Das, 57–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
MezzadriAlessandra. 2019. On the value of social reproduction: Informal labor, the majority world, and the need for inclusive theories and politics. Radical Philosophy2 (4): 33–41.
16.
MezzadriAlessandra. 2022. Social reproduction and pandemic neoliberalism: Planetary crises and the reorganization of life, work, and death. Organization29 (3): 379–400.
17.
PiasnaAngelikaZwysenWouterDrahokoupilJan. 2022. The Platform Economy in Europe. Results from the Second ETUI Internet and Platform Work Survey. ETUI Working Paper no. 2022.05. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute. Accessed at: https://www.etui.org/publications/platform-economy-europe.
18.
RaiShirinWaylenGeorgina. 2014. New Frontiers in Feminist Political Economy. London: Routledge.
19.
RaniUmaCastel-BrancoRuthSatijaShivaniNayarMahima. 2022. Women, work, and the digital economy. Gender & Development30 (3): 421–35.
20.
RathiAayushTandonAmbika. 2021. Platforms, Power, and Politics: Perspectives from Domestic and Care Work in India. Bangalore, India: The Centre for Internet and Society. Accessed at: https://cis-india.org/raw/platforms-power-and-politics-pdf.
21.
Rodríguez-ModroñoPaulaAgenjo-CalderónAstridLópez-IgualPurificación. 2022. Platform work in the domestic and home care sector: New mechanisms of invisibility and exploitation of women migrant workers. Gender & Development30 (3): 619–35.
22.
Rodríguez-ModroñoPaulaPesoleAnnarosaLópez-IgualPurificación. 2022. Assessing gender inequality in digital labor platforms in Europe. Internet Policy Review11 (1): 1–23.
23.
SchorJuliet B.Attwood-CharlesWilliamCansoyMehmetLadegaardIsakWengronowitzRobert. 2020. Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society49: 833–61.
24.
TiconaJuliaMateescuAlexandra. 2018. Trusted strangers: Carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society20 (11): 4384–404.
Van DoornNiels. 2017. Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Information, Communication & Society20 (6): 898–914.
27.
Van DoornNiels. 2022. Platform capitalism’s social contract. Internet Policy Review11 (1): 1–18.
28.
WoodAlex J.GrahamMarkLehdonvirtaViliHjorthIsis. 2019. Networked but commodified: The (dis)embeddedness of digital labor in the gig economy. Sociology53 (5): 931–50.
29.
ZahnRebecca. 2019. Trade unions, the gig economy, and the feminization of work: Lessons from the past? In Theorizing Labor Law in a Changing World, eds. BlackhamAlysiaKullmannMiriamZbyszewskaAnia, 107–23. West Sussex, UK: Hart.
