This article employs Miyazawa’s method to investigate the interaction between productive and unproductive sectors during the 2002–2014 period in Brazil. The results showed a growing dependence of productive on unproductive sectors together with a rise in the unproductive share in the economy, particularly after 2008. Our findings stressed the relationship between the rising importance of unproductive industries and lower total output growth, as emphasized by the classical-Marxian literature.
AssaJacob. 2017. The Financialization of GDP: Implications for Economic Theory and Policy. New York: Routledge.
2.
BorghiRoberto. 2017. The Brazilian productive structure and policy responses in the face of the international economic crisis: An assessment based on input-output analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics43: 62–75.
3.
CroninBruce. 2001. Productive and unproductive capital: A mapping of the New Zealand system of national accounts to classical economic categories, 1972–95. Review of Political Economy13 (3): 309–27.
4.
Dávila-FernándezMarwillPunzoLionello. 2020. Financialization as structural change: Measuring the financial content of things. Economic Systems Research32 (1): 98–120.
5.
DuttAmitava. 1991. Unproductive activity and stagnation: A neo-Marxian model. Review of Radical Political Economics23 (1–2): 95–103.
6.
DuttAmitava. 1992. “Unproductive” sectors and economic growth: A theoretical analysis. Review of Political Economy4 (2): 178–202.
7.
FilgueirasLuiz. 2017. Economia, política e o bloco no poder no Brasil. Bahia análise dados27 (2): 147–73.
8.
FritzOliverSonisMichaelHewingsGeoffrey. 1998. A Miyazawa analysis of interactions between polluting and non-polluting sectors. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics9: 289–305.
9.
GuilhotoJoquimSessoUmberto. 2005. Estimação da matriz insumo-produto a partir de dados preliminares das contas nacionais. Economia Aplicada9: 1–23.
LaibmanDavid. 1993. The falling rate of profit: A new empirical study. Science & Society57 (2): 223–33.
13.
LaibmanDavid. 1999. Productive and unproductive labor: A comment. Review of Radical Political Economics31 (2): 61–73.
14.
LeontiefWassily. 1953. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
LópezEmilianoInsuaFacundo. 2019. The specific conditions of the valorization of capital in a dependent nation: The case of Argentina (2002–2014). Review of Radical Political Economics51 (1): 75–94.
16.
LoureiroPedro. 2020. Class inequality and capital accumulation in Brazil, 1992–2013. Cambridge Journal of Economics44 (1): 181–206.
17.
MarquettiAdalmirHoffCecíliaMiebachAlessandro. 2020. Profitability and distribution: The origin of the Brazilian political crisis. Latin American Perspectives47 (1): 115–33.
18.
MarquettiAdalmirMorroneHenriqueMiebacAlessandroOuriqueLuiz. 2019. Measuring the profit rate in an inflationary context: The case of Brazil, 1995–2008. Review of Radical Political Economics51 (1): 52–74.
19.
MartinsGuilhermeRugitskyFernando. 2021. The long expansion and the profit squeeze: Output and profit cycles in Brazil (1996–2016). Review of Radical Political Economics53 (3): 373–97.
20.
MazzucatoMariana. 2018. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. New York: Hachette.
21.
MillerRonaldBlairPeter. 2009. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
MiyazawaKenichi. 1966. Internal and external matrix multipliers in the input-output model. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics7 (1): 38–55.
23.
MiyazawaKenichi. 1971. An analysis of the interdependence between service and goods-producing sectors. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics12 (1): 10–21.
24.
MiyazawaKenichi. 1976. Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. New York: Springer.
25.
MohunSimon. 2005. On measuring the wealth of nations: The US economy 1964–2001. Cambridge Journal of Economics29 (5): 799–815.
26.
MoseleyFred. 1985. The rate of surplus-value in the postwar US economy: A critique of Weisskopf’s estimates. Cambridge Journal of Economics9 (1): 57–79.
27.
MoseleyFred. 1992. The Falling Rate of Profit in the Postwar United States Economy. New York: St. Martin’s.
28.
MoseleyFred. 1993. Unproductive labor and the profit rate: A response to Laibman’s review. Science & Society58 (1): 84–92.
29.
MoseleyFred. 1997. The rate of profit and the future of capitalism. Review of Radical Political Economics29 (4): 23–41.
30.
OkuyamaYasuhideSonisMichaelHewingsGeoffrey. 1999. Economic impacts of an unscheduled, disruptive event: A Miyazawa multiplier analysis. In Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure, eds. HewingsGeoffreySonisMichaelMadenMossKimuraYoshio, 113–144. New York: Springer.
31.
PaitaridisDimitrisTsoulfidisLefteris. 2012. The growth of unproductive activities, the rate of profit, and the phase-change of the US economy. Review of Radical Political Economics44 (2): 213–33.
32.
ParkHyunRieuDong-Min. 2020. A mathematical formulation of the dual nature of unproductive labor. Review of Radical Political Economics52 (4): 716–38.
33.
Pinheiro-MachadoRosana. 2019. Amanhã Vai Ser Maior: O que Aconteceu com o Brasil e Possíveis Rotas de Fuga para a Crise Atual. São Paulo: Planeta do Brasil.
34.
SavranSungurTonakAhmet. 1999. Productive and unproductive labor: An attempt at clarification and classification. Capital & Class71 (68): 113–52.
35.
ShaikhAnwarTonakAhmet. 1994. Measuring the Wealth of Nations: The Political Economy of National Accounts. UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SingerAndré. 2012. Os Sentidos do Lulismo: Reforma Gradual e Pacto Conservador. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
37.
SingerAndré. 2018. O Lulismo em Crise: Um Quebra-cabeça do Período Dilma (2011–2016). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
38.
SmithAdam. (1776) 2003. The Wealth of Nations. New York: Bantam Dell.
39.
SmithMurray. 1993. Productivity, valorization, and crisis: Socially necessary unproductive labor in contemporary capitalism. Science & Society57 (3): 262–93.
40.
SonisMichaelHewingsGeoffrey. 1993. Hierarchies of regional sub-structures and their multipliers within input-output systems: Miyazawa revisited. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics34 (1): 33–44.
41.
SonisMichaelHewingsGeoffrey. 1999a. Miyazawa’s contributions to understanding economic structure: Interpretation, evaluation, and extensions. In Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure, eds. HewingsGeoffreySonisMichaelMadenMossKimuraYoshio, 13–52. New York: Springer.
42.
SonisMichaelHewingsGeoffrey. 1999b. Economic landscapes: Multiplier product matrix analysis for multiregional input-output systems. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics40 (1): 59–74.
43.
SweezyPaulMagdoffHarry. 1987. Stagnation and the Financial Explosion: Economic History As It Happened. New York: Monthly Review Press.
44.
TregennaFiona. 2011. What does the “services sector” mean in Marxian terms?Review of Political Economy23 (2): 281–98.
45.
TsoulfidisLefterisTsalikiPersefoni. 2019. Classical Political Economics and Modern Capitalism: Theories of Value, Competition, Trade and Long Cycles. London: Springer Nature.
