This article offers a reformulation of social reproduction theory’s (SRT’s) circuit of social reproduction that is suitable for the Global South. Drawing from existing literature, the article argues that wage labor is not always central to social reproduction and that there exist multiple labors of social reproduction associated with capitalist production, noncapitalist commodity production, and subsistence production. These stylized interrelated labor processes, which are coconstituted with nature, represent the circuits of social reproduction. The circuits clarify how working people engage in social reproduction even when the wage economy is inadequate for survival. They also offer a basis for interrogating crises of social reproduction when the totality of work time does not guarantee socially determined necessary consumption. These reworked circuits present opportunities for identifying both potential sites of exploitation and sites of resistance in the Global South.
AliTariq Omar. 2018. A Local History of Global Capital: Jute and Peasant Life in the Bengal Delta. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AminSamirPearceBrian. 1976. Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism. Brighton, UK: Harvester.
3.
AngelsenArildJaggerPamelaBabigumiraRonnieBelcherBrianHogarthNicholasBauchSimoneBörnerJanSmith-HallCarstenWunderSven. 2014. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis. World Development64 (1): S12–28.
4.
AsherKiranShattuckAnnie. 2017. Forests and food security: What’s gender got to do with it?Social Science6 (1). Accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/1/34
5.
BaillyFrankLeneAlexandra. 2015. What makes a good worker? Richard Edwards is still relevant. Review of Radical Political Economics47 (2): 176–92.
6.
BakkerIsabellaGillStephen. 2019. Rethinking power, production, and social reproduction: Toward variegated social reproduction. Capital & Class43 (4): 503–23.
7.
BanajiJairus. 1977. Modes of production in a materialist conception of history. Capital & Class1 (3): 1–44.
8.
———. 2010. Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
9.
BasuDeepankarBasoleAmit. 2015. Fuelling calorie intake decline: Household-level evidence from rural India. World Development68: 82–95.
10.
BeneriaLourdesSenGita. 1981. Accumulation, reproduction and women’s role in economic development: Boserup revisited. Signs7 (2): 279–98.
11.
BenzansonKateLuxtonMeg. eds. 2006. Social Reproduction. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
12.
BernsteinHenry. 2005. Rural land and land conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Reclaiming the land: The resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America, eds. MoyoSamYerosParis, 67–101. New York: Zed Books.
13.
BhattacharyaSnehashishKesarSurbhi. 2020. Precarity and development: Production and labor processes in the informal economy in India. Review of Radical Political Economics52 (3): 387–408.
———. 2017b. How not to skip class: Social reproduction of labor and the global working class. In Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Exploitation, Centering Oppression, ed. BhattacharyaTithi, 68–93. London: Pluto Press.
16.
BohrerAshley. 2018. Intersectionality and Marxism: A critical historiography. Historical Materialism26 (2): 46–74.
17.
BremanJan. 2020. The pandemic in India and its impact on footloose labor. Indian Journal of Labour Economics63: 901–19.
18.
BurkettPaul. 2006. Marxism and Ecological Economics:Toward a Red and Green Political Economy. Boston: Brill.
19.
BuscherBramFletcherRobert. 2014. Accumulation by conservation. New Political Economy20 (2): 273–98.
CohenJenniferRodgersYana. 2021. The feminist political economy of COVID-19: Capitalism, women, and work. Global Public Health16 (8–9): 1381–95.
22.
CookePriscilla. 1998. Intrahousehold labor allocation responses to environmental good scarcity: A case study from the hills of Nepal. Economic Development and Cultural Change46: 807–30.
23.
CousinsBenDubbAlexHornbyDonnaMteroFarai. 2018. Social reproduction of “classes of labor” in the rural areas of South Africa: Contradictions and contestations. Journal of Peasant Studies45 (5–6): 1060–85.
24.
Dalla CostaMariaJamesSelma. 1972. The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Bristol: Falling Wall.
25.
DasMaitreyiDuttaPuja. 2008. Does Caste Matter for Wages in the Indian Labor Market?Paper presented at the Third IZA/World Bank Conference on Employment and Development, Rabat, Morocco.
26.
DavisAngela. 1981. Women, Race and Class. New York: Random House.
27.
de JanvryAlain. 1981. The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
DeereCarmen Diana. 1976. Rural women’s subsistence production in the capitalist periphery. Review of Radical Political Economics8 (1): 9–17.
29.
———. 1990. Household and Class Relations: Peasants and Landlords in Northern Peru. Berkeley: University of California Press.
FergusonSusan. 2019. Women and Work: Feminism, Labour, and Social Reproduction. London: Pluto.
35.
FernandesBernado Mercado. 2005. The occupation as a form of access to land in Brazil: A theoretical and methodological contribution. In Reclaiming the Land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, eds. MoyoSamYerosParis, 317–40. New York: Zed Books.
36.
FraserNancy. 2014. Behind Marx’s abode. New Left Review86: 55–72.
37.
———. 2016. Capitalism’s crisis of care. Dissent63 (4): 30–37.
38.
FraserNancy. 2017. Crisis of care? On the social-reproductive contradictions of contemporary capitalism. In Social Reproduction theory: Remapping Exploitation Centering Oppression, ed. BhattacharyaTithi, 21–36. London: Pluto Press.
39.
GadgilMadhavMalhotraKailash. 1983. Adaptive significance of the Indian caste system: An ecological perspective. Annals of Human Biology10 (5): 465–77.
Gibson-GrahamJ. K.2006. A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
GopalMeena. 2013. Ruptures and reproduction in caste/gender/labor. Economic and Political Weekly47 (18): 91–97.
43.
Harriss-WhiteBarbara. 2010. Globalization, the financial crisis and petty-commodity production in India’s socially regulated economy. In Globalization and Labor in China and India: Impacts and Responses, eds. BowlesPaulHarrissJonathan, 131–50. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
———. 2014. Labor and petty production. Development and Change45 (5): 981–1000.
———. 2011. Revisiting the domestic labor debate: An Indian perspective. Historical Materialism19 (3): 3–28.
47.
HickeyGordonPouliotMarièveSmith-HallCarstenWunderSvenNielsenMartin. 2016. Quantifying the economic contribution of wild food harvests to rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis. Food Policy62: 122–32.
JohnMary. 2013. The problem of women’s labor: Some autobiographical perspectives. Indian Journal of Gender Studies20 (2): 177–212.
50.
JohnstonDeborahStevanoSaraMalapitHazelHullElizabethKadiyalaSuneetha. 2018. Review: Time use as an explanation for the agri-nutrition disconnect evidence from rural areas in low and middle-income countries. Food Policy76: 8–18.
51.
KannanKannanRaveendranG.2019. From jobless to job-loss growth. Economic and Political Weekly54 (44): 38–44.
52.
LebowitzMichael. 2003. Beyond Capital: Marx’s Political Economy of the Working Class. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
LuxtonMeg. 2006. Feminist political economy in Canada and the politics of social reproduction. In Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neoliberalism, eds. Kate BezansonLuxtonMeg, 11–44. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
———. 2020. The informal labors of social reproduction. Global Labour Journal11 (1): 156–63.
59.
MezzadriAlessandraLuluFan. 2018. “Classes of labor” at the margins of global commodity chains in India and China. Development and Change49 (4): 1034–63.
60.
MiesMaria. 1982. The Lace Makers of Narsapur: Indian Housewives Produce for the World Market. London: Zed Books.
61.
———. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. London: Zed Books.
62.
MiesMariaBennholdt-ThomsenVeronicavon WerlhofClaudia. 1988. Women: The Last Colony. London: Zed Books.
63.
MitchellKatharyneMarstonSallieKatzCindi. 2004. Life’s Work: Geographies of Social Reproduction. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
64.
MooreJason. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.
65.
MoyoSamYerosParis. eds. 2005. Reclaiming the Land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. New York: Zed Books.
66.
MoyoSamYerosParisJhaPraveen. 2012. Imperialism and primitive accumulation: Notes on the new scramble for Africa. Agrarian South1 (2): 181–203.
67.
MunroKirstin. 2019. “Social Reproduction Theory,” social reproduction, and household production. Science and Society83 (4): 451–68.
68.
NaiduSirisha C.2009. Heterogeneity and collective management: Evidence from common forests in Himachal Pradesh, India. World Development37 (3): 676–686.
69.
———. 2013. Legal exclusions, private wealth, and livelihoods: An analysis of work time allocation in protected areas. Ecological Economics89: 82–91.
70.
———. 2015. Conservation as economic imperialism. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism, eds. NessImmanuelCopeZak, 976–82. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
71.
———. 2016. Domestic labor and female labor force participation: Adding a piece to the puzzle. Economic and Political Weekly51 (44–45): 101–8.x.
72.
———. 2021. The continuing saga of women’s work during COVID-19. Economic and Political Weekly56 (17): 37–43.
73.
NaiduSirisha C.OssomeLyn. 2016. Social reproduction and the agrarian question of women’s labor in India. Agrarian South5 (1): 1–27.
74.
———. 2018. Work, gender, and immiseration in South Africa and India. Review of Radical Political Economics50 (2): 332–48.
75.
NilssonMalinMazumdarIndraniNeunsingerSilke, eds. 2021. Home-Based Work and Home-Based Workers (1800–2021). Boston: Brill.
O’LaughlinBridget. 2013. Land, labor, and the production of affliction in rural Southern Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change13 (1): 175–96.
78.
OssomeLynNaiduSirisha C.2021. The agrarian question of gendered labor. In Labour Questions in the Global South, eds. JhaPraveenChambatiWalterOssomeLyn, 63–86. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
79.
QuickPaddy. 2004. Subsistence wages and household production: Clearing the way for an analysis of class and gender. Review of Radical Political Economics36 (1): 20–36.
80.
———. 2008. Unpaid, reproductive, caring labor? The production of labor power? Theoretical and practical implications of terms used for women’s work. Review of Radical Political Economics40 (3): 308–14.
81.
———. 2010. Feudalism and household production. Science and Society74 (2): 157–83.
82.
———. 2018. Labor power: A “peculiar” commodity. Science and Society82 (3): 386–412.
83.
QuijanoAnibal. 2000. Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla1 (3): 533–80.
84.
RaoSmriti. 2021. Beyond the coronavirus: Understanding crises of social reproduction. Global Labour Journal12 (1): 39–53.
85.
RodriguezFranciscoJayadevArjun. 2013. The declining labor share of income. Journal of Globalization and Development3 (2): 1–18.
86.
SanyalKalyan. 2007. Rethinking Capitalist Development: Primitive Accumulation, Governmentality, and Post-colonial Capitalism. New Delhi: Routledge.
87.
ShahAlpaLercheJens. 2020. Migration and the invisible economies of care: Production, social reproduction and seasonal migrant labor in India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers45 (4): 719–34.
88.
SharmaMukul. 2017. Caste and Nature: Dalits and Indian Environmental Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89.
SenSamita. 2019. The problem of reproduction: Waged and unwaged domestic work. In “Capital” in the East: Reflections on Marx, eds. ChakrabortyAchinChakrabartiAnjanDasguptaByasdebSenSamita, 173–93. Singapore: Springer.
90.
ShivjiIssa. 2017. The concept of working people. Agrarian South6 (1): 1–13.
91.
SmithNeil. 2007. Nature as an accumulation strategy. In Coming to Terms with Nature, eds. PanitchLeoLeysColin, 16–36. London: Merlin.
92.
SmithBarbara EllenWindersJamie. 2015. Whose lives, which work? Class discrepancies in life’s work. In Precarious Worlds: Contested Geographies of Social Reproduction, eds. MeehanKatieStraussKendra, 101–117. London: The University of Georgia Press.
93.
Stats SA. 2017. Quarterly Labour Force Survey. Quarter 2: 2017. Statistical Release P0211. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
VogelLise. (1983) 2014. Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
98.
WindersJamieSmithBarbara E.2018. Social reproduction and capitalist production: A genealogy of dominant imaginaries. Progress in Human Geography43: 871–89.
