This article forwards the notion of “expulsionary urbanization” to explain processes of urban transformation in Pakistan against the backdrop of neoliberal regime of accumulation. The concept of expulsionary urbanization emphasizes that the production of new urban spaces is predicated on the theft of space, where one segment of the society appropriates space from another. On the one hand, expulsionary urbanization facilitates capital accumulation by creating new gated housing enclaves; on the other hand, it produces spatial estrangement for the marginalized groups. To delineate processes of spatial commodification, the article reintroduces the conceptual category of “subsumption of space” by capital, that is, capital’s drive to valorize itself by transforming land into a form of a fictitious capital.
AcemogluDaronJohnsonSimonRobinsonJames A.2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review91 (1): 1369–401.
2.
AkhtarSajjad Aasim. 2011. Patronage and class in urban Pakistan. Critical Asian Studies43 (2): 159–84.
3.
AkhtarSajjad Aasim. 2018. The Politics of Common Sense: State, Society and Culture in Pakistan. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AkhtarSajjad AasimRashidAmmar. 2021. Dispossession and the militarized developer state: Financialization and class power on the agrarian—urban frontier of Islamabad, Pakistan. Third World Quarterly42 (8): 1866–84.
5.
AliImtiaz.2021. Case registered against Bahria Town Karachi guards on charges of rioting, kidnapping. Dawn. Accessed at: https://www.dawn.com/news/1622713.
6.
AndreucciDiegoGarcía-LamarcaMelissaWedekindJonahSwyngedouwErik. 2017. “Value grabbing”: A political ecology of rent. Capitalism Nature Socialism28 (3): 28–47.
7.
AnwarHafeeza Nausheen. 2012. State power, civic participation, and the urban frontier: The politics of the commons in Karachi. Antipode44 (3): 601–20.
8.
AnwarHafeeza Nausheen. 2018. Receding rurality, booming periphery value struggles in Karachi’s agrarian-urban frontier. Economic and Political Weekly53 (12): 46–55.
9.
AnwarHafeeza NuasheenAnjumGulnaz. 2021. Land, Governance, and the Gendered Politics of Displacement in Urban Pakistan. Karachi: Karachi Urban Lab, Institute of Business Administration.
10.
ArvidsonEnid. 1995. Cognitive mapping and class politics: Towards a nondeterminist image of the city. Rethinking Marxism8 (2): 8–23.
11.
AnwarHafeeza NuasheenAnjumGulnaz. 2008. Remapping Los Angeles, or, taking the risk of class in postmodern urban theory. Economic Geography75 (2): 134–56.
12.
BalakrishnanSai. 2019. Shareholder Cities: Land Transformations Along Urban Corridors in India. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
BrennerNeil. 2018. Debating planetary urbanization: For an engaged pluralism. Society and Space36 (3): 570–90.
15.
BrennerNeilSchmidChristian. 2015. Towards a new epistemology of the urban?City19 (2–3): 151–82.
16.
BuckDaniel. 2007. The subsumption of space and the spatiality of subsumption: Primitive accumulation and the transition to capitalism in Shanghai, China. Antipode39 (4): 757–74.
17.
CDA (Capital Development Authority). 2021. Housing Society Bulletin. Islamabad: Pakistan.
18.
ChatterjeeIpsita. 2014. Displacement, Revolution, and the New Urban Condition: Theories and Case Studies. New Delhi: Sage.
19.
ChatterjeeIpsita. 2020. Overcoming the limits of theory: Conceptual musings on displacement. In Housing Displacement: Conceptual and Methodological Issues, eds. BeatenGuyListerbornCarinaPersdotterMariaPullEmil, 33–52. New York: Routledge.
20.
ChangHa-Joon2003. Globalization, Economic Development and the Role of the State. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
21.
DasRaju. 2012. Reconceptualizing capitalism: Forms of subsumption of labor, class struggle, and uneven development. Review of Radical Political Economics44 (2): 178–200.
22.
DavisMike. 2006. Planet of Slums. New York: Verso.
23.
de KadtMaarten. 2016. Two views on urban revolution. Review of Radical Political Economics48 (2): 345–50.
24.
EngelsFriedrich. [1844] 1969. Conditions of the Working Class in England. London: Panther.
FahadShahLiaWeiLashariaAkhtar HussainIslamaAkhtarKhattakLubna HashimRasoolUmair. 2021. Evaluation of land use and land cover spatio-temporal change during rapid urban sprawl from Lahore, Pakistan. Urban Climate39 (1): 1–17.
27.
FernandezVictor. 2015. Global value chains in global political networks: Tool for development or neoliberal device?Review of Radical Political Economics47 (2): 209–30.
28.
FoxSean. 2012. Urbanization as a global historical process: Theory and evidence from Sub- Saharan Africa. Population and Development Review38 (2): 285–310.
29.
GillespieTom. 2016. Accumulation by urban dispossession: Struggles over urban space in Accra, Ghana. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers41 (1): 66–77.
30.
GlaeserEdward. 2013. A World of Cities: The Causes and Consequences of Urbanization in Poorer Countries. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w19745.
31.
GoonewardenaKanishka. 2004. Urban space and political consciousness: A report on theory. Review of Radical Political Economics36 (2): 155–76.
32.
GuhaRanajit. 1997. Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
HarveyDavid. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
HarveyDavid. 2006. The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
HasanArif. 2015. Land contestation in Karachi and the impact on housing and urban development. Environment and Urbanization27 (1): 217–230.
38.
HewitsonGillian. 2014. The commodified womb and neoliberal families. Review of Radical Political Economics46 (4): 489–95.
39.
JayadevArjunBowlesSam. 2006. Guard labor. Journal of Development Economics79 (2): 328–48.
40.
KhanDanish. 2021. Political economy of uneven state-spatiality: Conflict, class, and institutions in postcolonial state of Pakistan. Rethinking Marxism33 (1): 52–70.
41.
KhanDanishAkhtarAasim Sajjad. 2022. Transforming a praetorian polity: Political economy of democratization in Pakistan. Canadian Journal of Development Studies. Accessed at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2021.2012132.
42.
KhanDanishKarakAnirban. 2018. Urban development by dispossession: Planetary urbanization and primitive accumulation. Studies in Political Economy99 (3): 307–30.
KoechlinTom. 2014. Urban inequality, neoliberalism, and the case for a multidisciplinary economics. Review of Radical Political Economics46 (4): 451–60.
45.
KonstantinidisCharalampos. 2016. The neoliberal restructuring of agriculture and food in Greece. Review of Radical Political Economics48 (4): 544–52.
46.
LefebvreHenri. 2000. The Production of Space. Cambridge: Blackwell.
47.
LeitnerHelgaSheppardEric. 2018. From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta. Environment and Planning A50 (2): 437–56.
48.
LevienMichael. 2014. Regimes of dispossession: From steel towns to special economic zones. Development and Change44 (2): 381–407.
49.
LevienMichael. 2018. Dispossession without Development: Land Grabs in Neoliberal India. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
MalikAmmar. 2015. Exploring the Dynamics of Urban Development with Agent-based Modeling: The Case of Pakistani Cities. PhD diss., Public Policy. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
SanyalKaylan. 2007. Rethinking Capitalist Development: Primitive Accumulation, Governmentality and Post-Colonial Capitalism. New Delhi: Routledge.
61.
SassenSaskia. 2010. A savage sorting of winners and losers: contemporary versions of primitive accumulation. Globalizations7 (1–2): 23–50.
62.
SassenSaskia. 2014. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
UN-Habitat. 2016. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. Nairobi: World Cities Report.
64.
VakulabharanamVamsi. 2005. Growth and distress in a south Indian peasant economy during the era of economic liberalization. Journal of Development Studies41 (6): 971–97.
65.
World Bank. 2014. Pakistan Urban Sector Assessment: Leveraging the Growth Dividend from the Urbanization Process. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
66.
World Bank. 2020. Leveling the Playing Field: Systematic Country Diagnostics. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
67.
WrennMary. 2016. Immanent critique, enabling myths, and the neoliberal narrative. Review of Radical Political Economics48 (3): 452–66.
68.
ZaidiS. Akbar. 2014. Rethinking Pakistan’s political economy: Class, state, power, and transition. Economic and Political Weekly49 (5): 47–54.
