Public sector reform (PSR) is believed to improve the performance of the public sector in particular and the economy in general by introducing market competition in service delivery. However, this paper shows that PSR uses a three-stage process to introduce neoliberal capitalism in African socialist states. The first stage dismantles the socialist state through strategies such as downsizing, decentralization, and privatization. The second stage introduces neoliberal capitalism in the former socialist state by removing government controls and allowing private sector actors to participate in economic activities. The third stage reconfigures the former socialist state into an agent of neoliberal capitalism. Ultimately, ordinary citizens are exploited and impoverished while private investors accumulate capital.
AkolgoIsaac A.2018. Afro-euphoria: Is Ghana’s economy an exception to the growth paradox?Review of African Political Economy45 (155): 146–57.
2.
AkyeampongEmmanuel. 2018. African socialism; or, the search for an indigenous model of economic development?Economic History of Developing Regions33 (1): 69–87.
3.
AyeeJoseph R. A.2008. Reforming the African Public Sector: Retrospect and Prospects. Dakar: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa. Accessed at: http://www.codesria.org/IMG/pdf/Ayee.pdf.
DillmanBradford. 2001. Facing the market in North Africa. The Middle East Journal55 (2): 198–215.
9.
DzimbiriLewis B.2008. Experiences in new public management in Africa: The case of performance management systems in Botswana. Africa Development33 (4): 43–58.
FraserAlastairLunguJohn. 2007. For Whom the Windfalls? Winners & Losers in the Privatisation of Zambia’s Copper Mines. Lusaka: Civil Society Trade Network of Zambia/Catholic Centre for Justice, Development and Peace. Accessed at: https://sarpn.org/documents/d0002403/Zambia_copper-mines_Lungu_Fraser.pdf.
13.
FriedmanMiltonFriedmanRose D.1980. Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. New York: Harcourt.
HeeksRichard. 1998. Information Systems and Public Sector Accountability. Information Systems for Public Sector Management Working Paper Series Paper no. 1. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management. Accessed at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3540081.
16.
HolcombeRandall G.2012. Planning and the invisible hand: Allies or adversaries?Planning Theory12 (2): 199–210.
17.
Human Rights Watch. 2011. “You’ll Be Fired If You Refuse”: Labor Abuses in Zambia’s Chinese State-Owned Copper Mines. New York: Human Rights Watch. Accessed at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4eb3dc642.html.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and International Development Association (IDA). 2000. Zambia: Decision Point Document for the enhanced Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative. Washington, DC: IMF and IDA. Accessed at: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/592141583530665282.
KaungaEphraim C.1993. Privatisation: The Zambian experience. In Privatisation: A Global Perspective, ed. RamanadhamVenkata V., 372–400. London: Routledge.
23.
KhisaMoses. 2019. Whose Africa is rising?Review of African Political Economy46 (160): 304–16.
KlijnErik-Hans. 2008. Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of ten years of research on the theme. Public Management Review10 (4): 505–25.
KoyiGrayson. 2010. Capacity Building for Decent Work in Zambia: Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector in Zambia. Report of Baseline Survey. Lusaka: LRS-CSAWUZ Project.
28.
KrishnaKamini. 2006. The impact of privatisation in resuscitating Zambia’s economy. In Governance and Public Services Delivery in Zambia, eds. Jotham C.MombaKalabulaMwamba D., 62–68. Lusaka: University of Zambia Press.
29.
LesterWilliam T.ReckhowSarah. 2012. Network governance and regional equity: Shared agendas or problematic partners?Planning Theory12 (2): 115–38.
MadimutsaCleverPretoriusLeon G.2017. Revisiting trade unions’ response to new public management: A case from Zambia. Public Personnel Management46 (3): 288–307.
34.
MadimutsaCleverPretoriusLeon G.2018. Public-private partnerships and industrial relations in the public sector in Zambia. African Journal of Public Affairs10 (4): 310–25.
MalisaseRoyd. 2016. Public sector reforms’ contribution to poor public service delivery in Zambia: Poor implementation or defective programmes?ZANGO: Zambian Journal of Contemporary Issues32: 59–76.
37.
MkandawireThandika. 2014. Can Africa turn from recovery to development?Current History113 (763): 171–77.
MugishaMicheal B.KitamirikeEmmanuel. 2017. Two decades of growth with limited job creation: What explains Uganda’s economic growth paradox?Journal of African Democracy and Development1 (2): 70–93.
NgosaStanslous. 2019. Inauguration of the National Health Insurance Management Board. Press statement, Lusaka. March16. Accessed at: https://www.moh.gov.zm/?p=6129.
PlautMartin. 2010. South Africa—The ANC’s difficult allies. Review of African Political Economy37 (124): 201–12.
51.
RaknerLise. 2003. Political and Economic Liberalisation in Zambia 1991–2001. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.
52.
Republic of Zambia. 1993. The Public Service Reform Programme (PSRP), Volume I—Main Report; Volume II—Detailed Review of the PSRP Launch Meeting Held November 2–4, 1993, at the Inter-Continental Hotel in Lusaka, Zambia. Lusaka: Cabinet Office.
SimutanyiNeo. 2011. Political challenges facing the Zambian labour movement ahead of the 2011 general elections. In The Labour Movement in Zambia, ed. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), 19–25. Lusaka: FES.
63.
StrangeSusan. 1994. States and Markets, 2nd edition.London: Pinter.
64.
TaylorIan. 2016. Dependency redux: Why Africa is not rising. Review of African Political Economy43 (147): 8–25.
