The present paper argues that the recent Brazilian crisis was related to a cyclical profit squeeze that took place between 2009 and 2014, following the long expansion that started in 2003. To do so, the cyclical trajectories of the output and the profit rate in the Brazilian economy for the period between 1996 and 2016 are examined by resorting to the framework established by Weisskopf (1979). The results indicate that profit squeezes are rare in the Brazilian economy, possibly due to the truncated character of the business cycles’ expansions. However, a profit squeeze did take place in the last cycle, partly as a result of the commodities boom, which attenuated the foreign vulnerability of the economy and allowed for a longer than usual expansion.
AraújoElianeGalaPaulo. 2012. Economic growth regimes in Brazil: Empirical evidence and policy implications. Estudos Avançados26 (75): 41–56.
2.
BakirErdoganCampbellAl. 2006. The effect of neoliberalism on the fall in the rate of profit in business cycles. Review of Radical Political Economics38 (3): 365–73.
3.
BakirErdoganCampbellAl. 2009. The Bush business cycle profit rate: Support in a theoretical debate and implications for the future. Review of Radical Political Economics41 (3): 335–42.
4.
BakirErdoganCampbellAl. 2017. Business cycles: Short-term dynamics. In Routledge Handbook in Marxian Economics, eds. BrennanDavidKristjanson-GuralDavidMulderCatherineOlsenErik, 234–44. New York: Routledge.
5.
Barbosa-FilhoNelsonSouzaJosé Antonio. 2010. A inflexão do governo Lula: Política econômica, crescimento e distribuição de renda. In Brasil entre o Passado e o Futuro, eds. SaderEmirGarciaMarco Aurélio, 57–110. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo/Boitempo.
6.
Barbosa-FilhoNelsonTaylorLance. 2006. Distributive and demand cycles in the US economy: A structuralist Goodwin model. Metroeconomica57 (3): 389–411.
7.
BasuDeepankar. 2010. Marx-biased technical change and the neoclassical view of income distribution. Metroeconomica61 (4): 593–620.
8.
BasuDeepankarChenYingOhJong-seok. 2013. Class struggle and economic fluctuations: VAR analysis of the post-war US economy. International Review of Applied Economics27 (5): 575–96.
9.
BelluzzoLuiz Gonzagade AlmeidaJúlio Gomes. 2002. Depois da Queda: A Economia Brasileira da Crise da Dívida Aos Impasses do Real. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
10.
BhaduriAmitMarglinStephen. 1990. Unemployment and the real wage: The economic basis of contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics14 (4): 375–93.
11.
BiancarelliAndréRosaRenatoVergnhaniniRodrigo. 2017. New features of the Brazilian external sector since the great global crisis. In The Brazilian Economy since the Great Financial Crisis of 2007/2008, eds. ArestisPhilipTroncoso BaltarCarolinaMagalhães PratesDaniela, 101–29. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
BleckerRobert1989. International competition, income distribution and economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics13 (3): 395–412.
13.
BoddyRafordCrottyJames. 1975. Class conflict and macro-policy: The political business cycle. Review of Radical Political Economics7 (1): 1–19.
14.
BoddyRafordCrottyJames. 1976. Wage, prices, and the profit squeeze. Review of Radical Political Economics8 (2): 63–67.
15.
BonelliRegis. 2016. Uma medida de utilização de capacidade na economia brasileira, 1947–2016. Instituto Brasileiro de Economia-Fundação Getulio Vargas Séries Históricas.
16.
BragaRuy. 2016. Terra em transe: O fim do lulismo e o retorno da luta de classes. In As Contradições do Lulismo: A Que Ponto Chegamos?, eds. SingerAndréLoureiroIsabel55–92. São Paulo: Boitempo.
17.
BrenckClaraCarvalhoLaura. 2020. The equalizing spiral in early 21st century Brazil: A Kaleckian model with sectoral heterogeneity. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics55: 298–310.
18.
BrennerRobert. 2003. The Boom and the Bubble: The US in the World Economy. London: Verso.
19.
BrennerRobert. 2006. The Economics of Global Turbulence: The Advanced Capitalist Economies from Long Boom to Long Downturn, 1945–2005. London: Verso.
20.
CámaraIzquierdo, Sergio. 2013. The cyclical decline of the profit rate as the cause of crises in the United States 1947–2011. Review of Radical Political Economics45 (4): 463–71.
21.
CarvalhoLauraRugitskyFernando. 2015. Growth and Distribution in Brazil in the 21st Century: Revisiting the Wage-Led versus Profit-Led Debate. Department of Economics FEA/USP Working Paper Series, no. 2015–25. Accessed at: http://www.repec.eae.fea.usp.br/documentos/Carvalho_Rugitsky_25WP.pdf.
CorrêaVanessa PetrelliSantosCláudio Hamilton. 2013. Modelo de crescimento brasileiro e mudança estrutural: Avanços e limites. In Padrão de Acumulação e Desenvolvimento Brasileiro, ed. CorrêaVanessa Petrelli19–55. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo.
ErtenBilgeOcampoJosé Antonio. 2013. Super cycles of commodity prices since the mid-nineteenth century. World Development44: 14–30.
29.
FarhiMaryse. 2006. O impacto dos ciclos de liquidez no Brasil: Mercados financeiros, taxa de câmbio, preços e política monetária. In A Supremacia dos Mercados e a Política Econômica do Governo Lula, ed. CarneiroRicardo173–205. São Paulo: Unesp.
30.
FeijóCarmem AparecidaFigueiredo CâmaraFelipeCerqueiraLuiz Fernando. 2015. Inflation, growth, and distribution: The Brazilian economy after post war. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics38 (4): 616–36.
31.
FeijóCarmem AparecidaLamônicaMarcos TostesBastosJulio Cesar. 2015. Accumulation pattern of the Brazilian economy in the 1990s and 2000s. International Review of Applied Economics29 (1): 15–31.
32.
FishlowAlbert. 2011. Starting Over: Brazil since 1985. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
GoldsteinJonathan. 1996. The empirical relevance of the cyclical profit squeeze: A reassertion. Review of Radical Political Economics28 (4): 55–92.
35.
GoldsteinJonathan. 1999. The simple analytics and empirics of the cyclical profit squeeze and cyclical underconsumption theories: Clearing the air. Radical Review of Political Economics31 (2): 74–88.
36.
GollinDouglas. 2002. Getting income shares right. Journal of Political Economy110 (2): 458–74.
GoodwinRichard. 1967A growth cycle. In Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth: Essays presented to Maurice Dobb, ed. FeinsteinCharles Hilliard54–58. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HenleyAndrew. 1987. Labour’s share and profitability crisis in the US: Recent experience and post-war trends. Cambridge Journal of Economics11 (4): 315–30.
40.
IBGE, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2006. Estatísticas do Século XX. IBGE. Accessed at: https://seculoxx.ibge.gov.br/.
JesusCleiton SilvaAraujoRicardo AzevedoDrumondCarlos Eduardo. 2018. An empirical test of the Post-Keynesian growth model applied to functional income distribution and the growth regime in Brazil. International Review of Applied Economics32 (4): 428–49.
43.
KaleckiMichal. 1943. Political aspects of full employment. Political Quarterly14 (4): 322–31.
44.
KaminskyGracielaReinhartCarmenVéghCarlos. 2005. When it rains, it pours: Procyclical capital flows and macroeconomic policies. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2004, eds. GertlerMarkRogoffKenneth11–53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
KrippnerGreta. 2005. The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review3 (2): 173–208.
46.
KrugmanPaulTaylorLance. 1978. Contractionary effects of devaluation. Journal of International Economics8 (3): 445–56.
LavoieMarc. 2014. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
49.
LavoieMarc. 2017. The origins and evolution of the debate on wage-led and profit-led regimes. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention14 (2): 200–221.
50.
LoureiroPedro Mendes. 2018. The Ebb and Flow of the Pink Tide: Reformist Development Strategies in Brazil and Argentina. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Economics, SOAS, University of London. Accessed at: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/30985/1/4664_Loureiro.pdf.
51.
LoureiroPedro Mendes. 2020. Class inequality and capital accumulation in Brazil, 1992–2013. Cambridge Journal of Economics44 (1): 181–206.
52.
MarcolinJoão Vitor. 2017. Distribuição Funcional da Renda Brasileira: Uma Análise do Período Recente. Unpublished undergraduate final dissertation, University of São Paulo.
MarquettiAdalmirHoffCeciliaMiebachAlessandro. 2020. Profitability and distribution: The origin of the Brazilian economic and political crisis. Latin American Perspectives47 (1): 115–33.
55.
MarquettiAdalmirFilhoEduardo MaldonadoLautertVladimir. 2010. The profit rate in Brazil, 1953–2003. Review of Radical Political Economics42 (4): 485–504.
56.
MarquettiAdalmirMorroneHenriqueMiebachAlessandroOuriqueLuiz Eduardo. 2019. Measuring the profit rate in an inflationary context: The case of Brazil, 1955–2008. Review of Radical Political Economics51 (1): 52–74.
57.
MarquettiAdalmirPorsseMelody. 2014. Patterns of technical progress in the Brazilian economy, 1952–2008. CEPAL Review113: 57–73.
NikiforosMichalis. 2016. On the “utilisation controversy”: A theoretical and empirical discussion of the Kaleckian model of growth and distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics40 (2): 437–67.
63.
NobreMarcos. 2013. Imobilismo em Movimento: Da Abertura Democrática ao Governo Dilma. São Paulo: Cia. das Letras.
64.
OcampoJosé AntonioRadaCodrinaTaylorLance. 2009. Growth and Policy in Developing Countries: A Structuralist Approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
65.
OECD. 2009. Measuring Capital OECD Manual, 2nd ed.Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
66.
OreiroJose LuisAraújoEliane. 2013. Exchange rate misalignment, capital accumulation and income distribution: Theory and evidence from the case of Brazil. Panoeconomicus60 (3): 381–96.
67.
PalmaGabriel. 2006. The 1999 Brazilian financial crisis: “Macho-monetarism” in action. Economic and Political Weekly41 (8): 727–37.
68.
PastoreAffonso CelsoPinottiMaria Cristina. 2005. Fiscal policy, inflation, and the balance of payments in Brazil. In Inflation Targeting, Debt, and the Brazilian Experience, 1999 to 2003, eds. GiavazziFrancescoGoldfajnIlanHerreraSantiago, 3–42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
PaulaLuiz FernandoModenesiAndréPiresManoel. 2015. The tale of the contagion of two crises and policy responses in Brazil: A case of Keynesian policy coordination?Journal of Post Keynesian Economics37 (3): 408–35.
70.
PaulaniLeda. 2008. Brasil delivery: Razões, contradições e limites da política econômica nos primeiros seis meses do governo Lula. In Brasil Delivery: Servidão Financeira e Estado de Emergência Econômico, ed. PaulaniLeda15–34. São Paulo: Boitempo.
71.
Pérez CaldenteyEstebanTitelmanDaniel. 2014. Macroeconomics for development in Latin America and the Caribbean: Some new considerations on countercyclicality. International Journal of Political Economy43 (1): 65–91.
72.
Pérez CaldenteyEstebanTitelmanDanielCarvalloPablo. 2014. Weak expansions: A distinctive feature of the business cycle in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Economic Review3: 69–89.
ReinhartCarmenReinhartVincentTrebeschChristoph. 2016. Global cycles: Capital flows, commodities, and sovereign defaults, 1815–2015. American Economic Review106 (5): 574–80.
RowthornRobert. 1981. Demand, real wages and economic growth. Thames Papers in Political Economy81 (3): 1–39.
77.
RugitskyFernando. 2013. Degree of monopoly and class struggle: Political aspects of Kalecki’s pricing and distribution theory. Review of Keynesian Economics1 (4): 447–64.
RugitskyFernando. 2019. Questão de estilo: A mudança estrutural para a igualdade e seus desafios. In Alternativas para o Desenvolvimento Brasileiro: Novos Horizontes para a Mudança Estrutural com Igualdade, eds. ViniciusMarcosLeiteChiliatto, 75–95. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL.
82.
Saad-FilhoAlfredoMoraisLecio. 2018. Brazil: Neoliberalism versus Democracy. London: Pluto Press.
83.
SchererClóvis. 2015. Payroll Tax Reduction in Brazil: Effects on Employment and Wages. International Institute of Social Studies Working Papers no. 602. Accessed at: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/emseuriss/77532.htm.
84.
SerranoFranklinSummaRicardo. 2012. Macroeconomic policy, growth and income distribution in the Brazilian Economy in the 2000s. Investigación Económica71 (282): 55–92.
85.
SerranoFranklinSummaRicardo. 2016. Aggregate demand and the slowdown of Brazilian economic growth in 2011–2014. Nova Economia 25 (n. especial): 803–33.
86.
SerranoFranklinSummaRicardo. 2018. Conflito distributivo e o fim da “breve era de ouro” da economia brasileira. Novos Estudos Cebrap37 (2): 175–89.
87.
ShaikhAnwar. 2016. Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88.
ShermanHoward. 1976. Class conflict and macro-policy: A comment. Review of Radical Political Economics8 (2): 55–60.
89.
ShermanHoward. 1997. Theories of cyclical profit squeeze. Review of Radical Political Economics29 (1): 139–47.
90.
SingerAndré. 2018. O Lulismo em Crise: Um Quebra-Cabeça do Período Dilma 2011–2016. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
91.
SingerAndré. 2020. The failure of Dilma Rousseff’s developmentalist experiment: A class analysis. Latin American Perspectives47 (1): 152–68.
92.
SkottPeter. 1989. Effective demand, class struggle and cyclical growth. International Economic Review30 (1): 231–47.
SteindlJosef. 1976. Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
95.
SummaRicardoSerranoFranklin. 2018. Distribution and conflict inflation in Brazil under inflation targeting, 1999–2014. Review of Radical Political Economics50 (2): 349–69.
96.
TaylorLance. 1985. A stagnationist model of economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics9 (4): 383–403.
97.
von ArninRudigerBarralesJose. 2015. Demand-driven Goodwin cycles with Kaldorian and Kaleckian features. Review of Keynesian Economics3 (3): 351–73.
98.
WeisskopfThomas. 1979. Marxian crisis theory and the rate of profit in the postwar US economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics3 (4): 341–78.
99.
WeisskopfThomas. 1988. An analysis of profitability changes in eight capitalist economies. Review of Radical Political Economics20 (2–3): 68–79.
