In light of Thomas Kuhn’s view that paradigm change requires the existence of an alternative paradigm, this inquiry examines whether behavioral economics provides a foundation for change in economics. Drawing on Kuhn’s account of normal science that integrates science as a social system and a system of ideas, it critically examines the institutional and conceptual standing of behavioral economics relative to the mainstream paradigm and the alternative proposed by radical political economics with a view to assess the extent and the quality of change behavioral economics can impart to the dominant tradition of normal science in economics.
AgassiJoseph. 1975. Institutional individualism. The British Journal of Sociology26 (2): 144–55.
2.
AmadaeSonja M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BackhouseRoger E. 2005. The rise of free market economics: Economists and the role of the state since 1970. History of Political Economy37 (5): 355–92.
CamererColin F. 1999b. Behavioral economics: Reunifying psychology and economics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science96 (19): 10575–77.
10.
CamererColin F. 2003. The Behavioral Challenge to Economics: Understanding Normal People.Federal Reserve of Boston Meeting “How Humans Behave”Caltech CA. June 8–10: 2–33.
11.
CamererColin F.LoewensteinGeorge. 2004. Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. InAdvances in Behavioral Economics, eds. CamererColin F.LoewensteinGeorge.RabinMatthew., 4–54. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
CamererColin F.LoewensteinGeorge.PrelecDrazen. 2005. Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature43 (1): 9–64.
CassidyJohn. 2010. Interview with Eugene Fama. The New Yorker Blogs13.
15.
ChickVictoria.DowSheila. 2005. The meaning of open systems. Journal of Economic Methodology12 (3): 363–81.
16.
CoryGerald AJr. 2006. Physiology and behavioral economics: The new findings from evolutionary neuroscience. InHandbook of Contemporary Behavioral Economics, ed. AltmanMorris., 24–49. Armonk, NY: E.M. Sharpe.
CoyleDiane M. 2010. The Soulful Science: What Economists Really Do and Why It Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19.
CravensHamilton. 2012. Column right, march! Nationalism, scientific positivism, and the conservative turn of the American social sciences in the cold war era. InCold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature, eds. SoloveyMark.CravensHamilton., 117–35. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
Crowther-HeyckHunter. 2005. Herbert A. Simon: The Bounds of Reason in Modern America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
Crowther-HeyckHunter. 2006. Patrons of the revolution: Ideals and institutions in postwar behavioral science. Isis97 (3): 420–46.
22.
DavisJohn B. 2003. The Theory of the Individual in Economics: Identity and Value. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
23.
DavisJohn B. 2011. Individuals and Identity in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DebreuGerard. 1959. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
DebreuGerard. 1986. Theoretic models: Mathematical form and economic content. Econometrica54 (6): 1259–70.
26.
DowSheila C. 2003. Critical realism and economics. InApplied Economics and the Critical Realist Critique, ed. DownwardPaul., 12–26. London: Routledge.
27.
DowSheila C. 2012. Methodological pluralism and pluralism of method. InFoundations for New Economic Thinking: A Collection of Essays, ed. DowSheila C., 129–39. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
DowSheila C. 2013. Formalism, rationality, and evidence: The case of behavioural economics. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics6 (3): 26–43.
29.
EarlPeter E. 2016. The evolution of behavioural economics. InRoutledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics, eds. FrantzRoger.ShuHeng Chen.DopferKurt.HeukelomFloris.MousaviShabnam., 5–17. London: Routledge.
30.
ElsterJon. 1982. The case for methodological individualism. Theory and Society11 (4): 453–82.
31.
EtzioniAmitai. 2011. Behavioral economics: Toward a new paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist55 (8): 1099–119.
32.
FineBen.JohnstonDeborah.SantosAna C.WaeyenbergeElisavan. 2016. Nudging or fudging: The World Development Report 2015. Development and Change47 (4): 640–63.
33.
FineBen.MilonakisDimitris. 2009. From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries Between Economics and Other Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
34.
FourcadeMarion. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35.
FrankRobert. 2008. Lessons from behavioral economics. Challenge51 (3): 80–92.
36.
FrerichsSabine. 2011. False promises? A sociological critique of the behavioural turn in law and economics. Journal of Consumer Policy34 (3): 289–314.
37.
FriedmanMilton. 1953. The methodology of positive economics. InEssays in Positive Economics, 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
GigerenzerGerd. 2016. Towards a rational theory of heuristics. InMinds, Models and Milieux, eds. FrantzRoger.MarshLeslie., 34–59. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
GiladBenjamin.KaishStanley.LoebPeter D.. 1984. From economic behavior to behavioral economics: The behavioral uprising in economics. Journal of Behavioral Economics13 (1): 1–22.
40.
GiladBenjamin.KaishStanley., eds. 1986. Handbook of Behavioral Economics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41.
GoodwinCraufurd D. 1998. The patrons of economics in a time of transformation. History of Political Economy30 (S1): 53–81.
HarrisonGlenn.RossDon. 2010. The methodologies of neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology17 (2): 185–96.
44.
HenrichJoseph.HeineSteven J.NorenzayanAra. 2010. The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences33 (2–3): 61–83.
45.
HerfeldCatherine. 2012. The potentials and limitations of rational choice theory: An interview with Gary Becker. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics5 (1): 73–86.
46.
HeukelomFloris. 2012. A sense of mission: The Alfred P. Sloan and Russell Sage Foundations’ behavioral economics program, 1984–1992. Science in Context25 (2): 263–86.
47.
HeukelomFloris. 2014. Behavioral Economics: A History. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
48.
HodgsonGeoffrey M. 2007. Meanings of methodological individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology14 (2): 211–26.
49.
IngraoBruna.IsraelGiorgio. 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
JeffreyH. Joel.PutmanAnthony O.. 2013. The irrationality illusion: A new paradigm for economics and behavioral economics. Journal of Behavioral Finance14 (3): 161–94.
51.
KahnemanDaniel. 2003. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review93 (5): 1449–75.
52.
KahnemanDaniel.TverskyAmos. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society47 (2): 263–91.
53.
KaldorNicholas. 1972. The irrelevance of equilibrium economics. The Economic Journal82 (328): 1237.
MataTiago. 2005. Dissent in economics: Making radical political economics and post-Keynesian economics, 1960–1980. PhD dissertation. London School of Economics and Political Science.
70.
MilonakisDimitris.FineBen. 2009. From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory. London: Routledge.
71.
MilonakisDimitris. 2017. Formalising economics: Social change, values, mechanics and mathematics in economic discourse. Cambridge Journal of Economics41 (5): 1367–90.
72.
MirowskiPhilip. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
73.
MorganMary S. 2012. The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
NagelErnest. 1963. Assumptions in economic theory. The American Economic Review53 (2): 211–19.
75.
PeabodyGerald E. 1971. Scientific paradigms and economics: An introduction. Review of Radical Political Economics3 (2): 1–16.
76.
PooleyJefferson D. 2016. A “not particularly felicitous” phrase: A history of the “behavioral sciences” label. Serendipities1 (1): 38–81.
77.
Phillips-FeinKim. 2009. Invisible Hands: The Making of the Conservative Movement from the New Deal to Reagan. New York: W.W. Norton.
78.
PooleyJefferson D.SoloveyMark. 2010. Marginal to the revolution: The curious relationship between economics and the behavioral sciences movement in mid-twentieth-century America. History of Political Economy42 (Suppl 1): 199–233.
79.
PorterTheodore M.RossDorothy. 2003. The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Social Sciences, vol. 7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
RabinMatthew. 1998. Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature36 (1): 11–46.
81.
RabinMatthew. 2002. A perspective on psychology and economics. European Economic Review46 (4–5): 657–85.
82.
RappaportSteven. 1996. Abstraction and unrealistic assumptions in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology3 (2): 215–36.
83.
ReutenGeert A. 1996. A revision of the neoclassical economics methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology3 (1): 39–68.
84.
RobinsonJoan. 1978. History versus equilibrium. InContributions to Modern Economics, ed.RobinsonJoan., 126–36. London: Academic Press.
85.
RossDon. 2008. Two styles of neuroeconomics. Economics and Philosophy24 (3): 473–83.
86.
SchreckerEllen. 1986. No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87.
SentEsther-Mirjam. 2004. Behavioral economics: How psychology made its (limited) way back into economics. History of Political Economy36 (4): 735–60.
88.
ShafirEldar. 2007. Decisions constructed locally: Some fundamental principles of the psychology of decision making. InSocial Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, eds. KruglanskiArie W.HigginsEdward T., 334–52. New York: Guilford Press.
89.
ShafirEldar.MullainathanSendhil. 2013. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means so Much. New York: Times Books.
90.
ShefrinHersh. 2015. The behavioral paradigm shift. Revista de Administração de Empresas55 (1): 95–98.
91.
ShermanHoward J. 1984. Contemporary radical economics. The Journal of Economic Education14 (5): 265–74.
92.
SimonHerbert A. 1957. Rationality and administrative decision making. InModels of Man: Social and Rational, Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, ed. SimonHerbert., 196–205. New York: Wiley and Sons.
93.
SimonHerbert A. (1963) 2007. Testability and Approximation. InThe Philosophy of Economics, ed. HausmanDaniel M., 179–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94.
SimonHerbert A. 1977. Models of Discovery and Other Topics in the Methods of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.
95.
SimonHerbert A. 1986. Rationality in psychology and economics. The Journal of Business59 (S4): S209–24.
96.
SmithVernon L. 1991a. Papers in Experimental Economics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
97.
SmithVernon L. 1991b. Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology. Journal of Political Economy99 (4): 877–97.
98.
SmithVernon L. 2005. Behavioral economics research and the foundations of economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics34 (2): 135–50.
99.
SoloveyMark. 2013. Shaky Foundations: The Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus in Cold War America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
100.
StiglerGeorge J. 1959. The politics of political economists. The Quarterly Journal of Economics73 (4): 522–32.
101.
SweezyPaul M. 1971. Toward a critique of economics. Review of Radical Political Economics3 (2): 59–66.
102.
TaylorJohn B. 2010. Does the crisis experience call for a new paradigm in monetary policy?CASE Network Studies & Analyses402: 4–21.
103.
ThalerRichard H. 1980. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization1 (1): 39–60.
104.
ThalerRichard H. 1986. The psychology and economics conference handbook: Comments on Simon, on Einhorn and Hogarth, and on Tversky and Kahneman. The Journal of Business59 (S4): S279–84.
105.
ThalerRichard H. 1991. Quasi Rational Economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
106.
ThalerRichard H.SunsteinCass R. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
107.
ThalerRichard H. 2015. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: W.W. Norton.
108.
TomerJohn F. 2007. What is behavioral economics?The Journal of Socio-Economics36 (3): 463–79.
109.
TverskyAmos.KahnemanDaniel. 1975. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. InUtility, Probability, and Human Decision Making, eds. WendtDirk.VlekC. A. J., 141–162. Springer: Dordrecht.
110.
UdehnLars. 2001. Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London: Routledge.
111.
URPE Secretariat. 1969. The Union for Radical Political Economics: A prospectus.The Conference Papers of the Union for Radical Political Economics, 173–74.
112.
WachtelHoward M. 2018. The Review of Radical Political Economics at its half century: A retrospective. Review of Radical Political Economics50 (3): 487–503.
113.
WeberRoberto.DawesRobyn. 2005. Behavioral economics. InThe Handbook of Economic Sociology, eds. SmelserNeil J.SwedbergRichard., 90–108. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
114.
WhiteheadMark.JonesRhys.HowellRachel.LilleyRachel.PykettJessica. 2014. Nudging All Over the World: Assessing the Impacts of the Behavioural Sciences on Public Policy. Swindon/Edinburgh: Economic and Social Research Council.
115.
WhiteheadMark.JonesRhys.LilleyRachel.HowellRachel.PykettJessica. 2018. Neuroliberalism: Cognition, context, and the geographical bounding of rationality. Progress in Human Geography43 (4): 632–49.
116.
WorlandStephen T. 1972. Radical political economy as a scientific revolution. Southern Economic Journal39 (2): 274–84.
117.
ZeckhauserRichard. 1986. Comments: Behavioral versus rational economics: What you see is what you conquer. The Journal of Business59 (S4): S435–49.
118.
ZweigMichael. 1971. Bourgeois and radical paradigms in economics. Review of Radical Political Economics3 (2): 43–58.
