This article addresses the questions of why and how precarity should be conceptualized in a Marxian framework on labor. We argue that precarity should be put back to production, which has a twofold meaning: first, we emphasize that the labor process is of crucial importance for conceptualizing precarity, and precarity in the labor process is interrelated with precarity in the labor market and labor reproduction. Second, precarity should be understood through the relationships of production, particularly through capital-labor conflict. Using one case study on Didi Kuaiche drivers in the city of Nanjing, China, we examine the nature of precarity in the flexible labor of the digital economy and present a more nuanced micronarrative of precarious work in the ride-hailing service.
AgarwalaRina. 2009. An economic sociology of informal work: The case of India. Research in the Sociology of Work18: 315–42.
2.
ArnoldDennisBongioviJoseph. 2013. Precarious, informalizing, and flexible work: Transforming concepts and understandings. American Behavioral Scientist57 (3): 289–308.
3.
BranchEnobong HannahHanleyCaroline. 2017. A racial-gender lens on precarious nonstandard employment. Research in the Sociology of Work31: 183–213.
4.
BremanJan. 2013. At Work in the Informal Economy of India: A Perspective from the Bottom Up. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5.
ChatterjeeIpsita. 2012. Feminism, the false consciousness of neoliberal capitalism? Informalization, fundamentalism, and women in an Indian city. Gender, Place and Culture19 (6): 790–809.
6.
ChenJulie Yujie. 2018. Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society20 (8): 2691–711.
7.
ChenLeMisloveAlanWilsonChristo. 2015. Peeking beneath the hood of Uber. Presented at Internet Measurement Conference, October28–30, Tokyo, Japan.
FriedmanGerald. 2014. Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics2 (2): 171–88.
12.
GandiniAlessandro. 2019. Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations72 (6): 1039–56.
13.
GuattariFélixNegriAntonio. 1990. Communists Like Us. New York: Semiotext(e).
14.
HuangPhilip C.C.2017. China’s informal economy, reconsidered: An introduction in light of social-economic and legal history. Rural China: An International Journal of History and Social Science14 (1): 1–17.
15.
International Labor Organization (ILO). 2016. Non-Standard Employment Around the World. Geneva: International Labour Office.
16.
KallebergArne L.2009. Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review74 (1): 1–22.
17.
KallebergArne L. 2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s–2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
KhanLina M.2017. Amazon’s antitrust paradox. The Yale Law Journal126 (3): 710–805.
19.
KuruvillaSaroshLeeChing KwanGallagherMary E., eds. 2011. Iron Rice Bowl to Informalization: Markets, Workers, and the State in a Changing China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
LazzaratoMaurizio (trans. Mary O’Neill). 2004. The Political Form Of Coordination. Vienna: European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies. Accessed at: http://eipcp.net/transversal/0707/lazzarato/en.
21.
LeeChing Kwan. 2017. Mapping the contested terrains of precarious labor in China. Rural China: An International Journal of History and Social Science14 (1): 155–64.
22.
MarxKarl. 1976. Capital Vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.
23.
MezzadriAlessandra. 2016. The informalization of capital and interlocking in labour contracting networks. Progress in Development Studies16 (2): 124–39.
Nanjing Statistical Yearbook. 2017. China Statistics Press.
29.
NeilsonBrettRossiterNed. 2008. Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture and Society25 (7–8): 51–72.
30.
PangIrene. 2019. The legal construction of precarity: Lessons from the construction sectors in Beijing and Delhi. Critical Sociology. 45 (4–5): 549–64.
31.
PradellaLucia. 2015. The working poor in Western Europe: Labour, poverty and global capitalism. Comparative European Politics13 (5): 596–613.
32.
RaunigGerald. 2004. La Inseguridad Vencerá: Anti-Precariousness Activism and Mayday Parades. Vienna: European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies. Accessed at: http://eipcp.net/transversal/0704/raunig/en.
33.
RodgersGerry. 1989. Precarious work in Western Europe: The state of the debate. In Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe, eds. Gerry Rodgers and Janine Rodgers, 1–16. Geneva: ILO Publications.
34.
RoganMichaelRoeverSallyChenMartha AlterCarréFrançoise. 2017. Informal employment in the global south: Globalization, production relations, and “precarity.”Research in the Sociology of Work31: 307–33.
35.
RosenblatAlexStarkLuke. 2016. Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication10: 3758–84.
36.
RossAndrew. 2010. Nice Work If You Can Get It: Life and Labor in Precarious Times. New York: New York University Press.
37.
SapkalRahul SureshSundarR. Shyam. 2017. Determinants of precarious employment in India: An empirical analysis. Research in the Sociology of Work31: 335–61.
38.
ShapiroAaron. 2018. Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media & Society20 (8): 2954–71.
39.
SiegmannKarin AstridSchiphorstFreek. 2016. Understanding the globalizing precariat: From informal sector to precarious work. Progress in Development Studies16 (2): 111–23.
40.
SmithChrisPunNgai. 2018. Class and precarity: An unhappy coupling in China’s working class formation. Work, Employment and Society32 (3): 599–615.
41.
SmithChrisThompsonPaul. 1998. Re-evaluating the labour process debate. Economic and Industrial Democracy19 (4): 551–77.
StandingGuy. 2013. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.
44.
StandingGuy. 2017. The precariat in China: A comment on conceptual confusion. Rural China: An International Journal of History and Social Science14 (1): 165–70.
45.
StanfordJim. 2017. The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. Economic & Labor Relations Review28 (3): 382–401.
46.
ThompsonPaulVincentSteve. 2010. Labour process theory and critical realism. In Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis, eds. ThompsonPaulSmithChris, 47–69. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
VoskoLeah F.2009. Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship, and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
WilliamsChristine L.2017. The gender of layoffs in the oil and gas industry. Research in the Sociology of Work31: 215–41.
49.
ZwickAustin. 2018. Welcome to the gig economy: Neoliberal industrial relations and the case of Uber. Geojournal83 (4): 679–91.
