Unequal exchange arises when spatial production of value is disjointed from its geographical distribution. A disaggregated monetary model of the world economy is presented on the grounds of Marx’s labor theory of value. All the forms of unequal exchange in international trade are explained, on the basis of a coherent definition of the forms of international value of traded commodities. Estimates of value transfers for recent years show the ongoing relevance of the unequal exchange in the modern capitalist world economy.
AminS.1976. Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
2.
AnandS.SegalP.2015. The global distribution of income. In Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 2, eds. AtkinsonA. B.BourguignonF. 937–79. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3.
BachaE. L.1978. An interpretation of unequal exchange from Prebisch-Singer to Emmanuel. Journal of Development Economics5 (4): 319–30.
4.
BaimanR.2006. Unequal exchange without a labor theory of prices: On the need for a global Marshall Plan and a solidarity trading regime. Review of Radical Political Economics38 (1): 71–89.
5.
BaimanR.2014. Unequal exchange and the rentier economy. Review of Radical Political Economics46 (4): 536–57.
6.
BaimanR.2017. The Global Free Trade Error: The Infeasibility of Ricardo’s Comparative Advantage Theory. London: Routledge.
7.
BakosG.1992. The problem of international values: Mainly from a Hungarian and Japanese perspective. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics33 (1): 63–93.
8.
BaranP.1957. The Political Economy of Growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
9.
BaranP.SweezyP. M.1966. Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order. New York: Monthly Review Press.
10.
BarnesT. J.1985. Theories of interregional trade and theories of value. Environment and Planning A17 (6): 729–46.
11.
BastiaT.2013. Migration and Inequality. London: Routledge.
12.
BauerO. [1907] 2000. The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy. Trans. by O’DonnellJ.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
BernalR. L.1980. Emmanuel’s unequal exchange as a theory of underdevelopment. Social and Economic Studies29 (4): 152–74.
14.
BettelheimC.1962. Politique de dévelopement: Échange international et development regional. In Échange Inégal et Politique de Dévelopement, Problèmes de Planification, n. 2, eds. EmmanuelA.BettelheimC., 22–40. Paris: Centre d’Étude de Planification Socialiste.
15.
BielerA.MortonA. D.2014. Uneven and combined development and unequal exchange: The second wind of neoliberal “free trade”?Globalizations11 (1): 35–45.
16.
BosmansK.DecancqK.DecosterA.2014. The relativity of decreasing inequality between countries. Economica81 (322): 276–92.
17.
BrolinJ.2007. The Bias of the World: Theories of Unequal Exchange in History. Lund: Lund University.
18.
BrolinJ.2016. Unequal exchange. In The Palgrave Encyclopaedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism, eds. NessI.CopeZ., 1160–1177. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
19.
BrülhartM.2009. An account of global intra-industry trade, 1962–2006. The World Economy32 (3): 401–59.
20.
BurgstallerA.1987. Industrialization, deindustrialization, and North-South trade. The American Economic Review77 (5): 1017–18.
21.
CarchediG.1988. Marxian price theory and modern capitalism. International Journal of Political Economy18 (3): 1–112.
22.
CarchediG.1989. Comparative advantage, unequal exchange and socialism: A reply to Tsang and Woo. Economy and Society18 (3): 360–64.
23.
CharnockG.StarostaG., eds. 2016. The New International Division of Labour. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
24.
De JanvryA.KramerF.1979. The limits of unequal exchange. Review of Radical Political Economics11 (4): 3–15.
25.
DevineJ.1990. The utility of value: The “New Solution,” unequal exchange, and crisis. Research in Political Economy12: 21–39.
26.
DuménilG.1980. De la Valeur Aux Prix De Production: Une Réinterprétation de la Transformation. Paris: Economica.
27.
DuménilG.FoleyD.2008. The Marxian transformation problem. In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, eds. DurlaufS. N.BlumeL. B.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
DuménilG.FoleyD.LévyD.2009. A note on the formal treatment of exploitation in a model with heterogeneous labor. Metroeconomica60 (3): 560–67.
29.
DunfordM.LiuW.LiuZ.YeungG.2014. Geography, trade and regional development: The role of wage costs, exchange rates and currency/capital movements. Journal of Economic Geography14 (6): 1175–97.
30.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. 1950. The Economic Development of Latin America. New York: United Nations Department of Economic Affairs.
31.
EdwardsC.2015. The Fragmented World: Competing Perspectives on Trade, Money and Crisis. London: Routledge.
32.
ElmasF.2009. World-Systems analysis and unequal exchange: The Turkish economy during the trade and financial liberalization process. International Journal of Economic Perspectives3 (3): 159–65.
33.
EmmanuelA.1962. Échange inégal. In Échange Inégal et Politique de Dévelopement, Problèmes de Planification, n. 2, eds. EmmanuelA.BettelheimC., 1–21. Paris: Centre d’Étude de Planification Socialiste.
34.
EmmanuelA.1972. Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade. New York: Monthly Review Press.
35.
EmmanuelA.1973. Risposta a Eugenio Somaini. In Salari, Sottosviluppo e Imperialismo. Un Dibattito Sullo Scambio Ineguale, eds. SomainiE.EmmanuelA.BoggioL.SalvatiM., 91–161. Torino, Italy: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
36.
EmmanuelA.1975. Unequal exchange revisited (IDS Discussion Paper No. 77). Brighton: University of Sussex.
37.
ErtenB.2011. North–South terms-of-trade trends from 1960 to 2006. International Review of Applied Economics25 (2): 171–84.
38.
EvansD.1976. Unequal exchange and economic policies: Some implications of neo-Ricardian critique of theory of comparative advantage. Economic and Political Weekly11 (5/7): 143–58.
39.
EvansD.1984. A critical assessment of some neo-Marxian trade theories. The Journal of Development Studies20 (2): 202–26.
40.
EvansD.1989. Alternative perspectives on trade and development. In Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 2, eds. CheneryH.SrinivasanT. N.1241–1304. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
41.
FedericoG.Tena-JunguitoA.2017. A tale of two globalizations: Gains from trade and openness 1800-2010. Review of World Economics153 (3): 601–26.
42.
FieldsG. S.2004. Dualism in the labor market: A perspective on the Lewis model after half a century. The Manchester School72 (6): 724–35.
43.
FindlayR.1980. The terms of trade and equilibrium growth in the world economy. The American Economic Review70 (3): 291–99.
44.
FindlayR.1984. Growth and development in trade models. In Handbook of International Economics, vol. 1, eds. JonesR. W.KenenP. B.185–236. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
45.
FindlayR.1989. Arthur Lewis lecture: National and global perspectives on economic development—The two models of Arthur Lewis. The Review of Black Political Economy18 (1): 17–29.
46.
FineB.LapavitsasC.Saad-FilhoA.2004. Transforming the transformation problem: Why the “New Interpretation” is a wrong turning. Review of Radical Political Economics36 (1): 3–19.
47.
FoleyD. K.1982. The value of money, the value of labor power and the Marxian transformation problem. Review of Radical Political Economics14 (2): 37–47.
48.
FoleyD. K.2005. Marx’s theory of money in historical perspective. In Marx’s Theory of Money. Modern Appraisals, ed. MoseleyF.36–49. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
FoleyD. K.2013. The long-period method and Marx’s theory of value. In The Evolution of Economic Theory: Essays in Honour of Bertram Schefold, ed CaspariV., 15–38. London: Routledge.
50.
FosterJ. B.HollemanH.2014. The theory of unequal ecological exchange: A Marx-Odum dialectic. Journal of Peasant Studies41 (2): 199–233.
51.
GibsonB.1980. Unequal exchange: Theoretical issues and empirical findings. Review of Radical Political Economics12 (3): 15–35.
52.
GodaT.GarcíaA. T.2017. The rising tide of absolute global income inequality during 1850–2010: Is it driven by inequality within or between countries?Social Indicators Research130 (3): 1051–72.
53.
GrossmannH. [1929] 1992. The Law of Accumulation and Breakdown of the Capitalist System. Trans. by BanajiJ.London: Pluto Press.
54.
HarveyD.2006. The Limits to Capital. New and Fully Updated Edition. London: Verso.
55.
HeintzJ.2006. Low-wage manufacturing and global commodity chains: A model in the unequal exchange tradition. Cambridge Journal of Economics30 (4): 507–20.
56.
HendersonJ.DickenP.HessM.CoeN.YeungH. W. C.2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy9 (3): 436–64.
57.
HigginbottomA.2014. “Imperialist rent” in practice and theory. Globalizations11 (1): 23–33.
58.
HornborgA.2014. Ecological economics, Marxism, and technological progress: Some explorations of the conceptual foundations of theories of ecologically unequal exchange. Ecological Economics105: 11–18.
59.
HoustonD.PausE.1987. The theory of unequal exchange: An indictment. Review of Radical Political Economics19 (1): 90–97.
60.
ItohM.2009. Unequal exchange reconsidered in our age of globalization. In Heterodox Macroeconomics: Keynes, Marx and Globalization, eds. GoldsteinJ. P.HillardM. G.200–210. London: Routledge.
61.
JosephG. G.TomlinsonM.1991. Testing the existence and measuring the magnitude of unequal exchange resulting from international trade: A Marxian approach. Indian Economic Review26 (2): 123–48.
62.
KöhlerG.2015. The structure of global money and world tables of unequal exchange. Journal of World-Systems Research4 (2): 145–68.
63.
KöhlerG.TauschA.2002. Global Keynesianism: Unequal Exchange and Global Exploitation. Huntington, NY: Nova Science.
64.
KollmeyerC.2009. Consequences of North–South trade for affluent countries: A new application of unequal exchange theory. Review of International Political Economy16 (5): 803–26.
65.
Kristjanson-GuralD.2003. Demand and the (re) distribution of value: An overdetermined approach. Rethinking Marxism15 (1): 117–40.
66.
Kristjanson-GuralD.2005. Exchange, demand and the market-price of production: Reconciling traditional and monetary approaches to value and price. Research in Political Economy22: 171–202.
67.
LeeC.1998. The distinction between social value, individual value, market value and market price in Volume III of Capital. In Marxian Economics: A Reappraisal, ed. BellofioreR.86–100. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
68.
LewisW A.1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School22 (2): 139–91.
69.
LewisW A.1969. Aspects of Tropical Trade 1583–1965. Stockholm: Almqvist.
70.
LewisW A.1978. The Evolution of the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
71.
LewisW A.1979. The dual economy revisited. The Manchester School47 (3): 211–29.
72.
LichtensteinP. M.2016. Theories of International Economics. London: Routledge.
73.
LiodakisG.1996. Terms of trade, international transfers of value and uneven development. Scientific Register of the University of Macedonia12 (2): 360–84.
74.
LonerganS. C.1988. Theory and measurement of unequal exchange: A comparison between a Marxist approach and an energy theory of value. Ecological Modelling41 (1–2): 127–45.
75.
MarelliE.1983. Empirical estimation of intersectoral and interregional transfers of surplus value: The case of Italy. Journal of Regional Science23 (1): 49–70.
76.
Mariña-FloresA.1998. Market price of production: A structural interpretation of disequilibrium in the framework of the law of value. International Journal of Political Economy28 (4): 82–118.
77.
MarxK.1995. Marx & Engels Collected Works, Volume 35: Capital Volume I. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
78.
MarxK.1998. Marx & Engels Collected Works, Volume 37: Capital Volume III. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
79.
MatsuiK.1970. The Marxian theory of international value. Kyoto University Economic Review40 (2): 1–17.
80.
MengJ.2015. Two kinds of MELT and their determinations: Critical notes on Moseley and the New Interpretation. Review of Radical Political Economics47 (2): 309–16.
81.
MilanovicB.2012. Global inequality: From class to location, from proletarians to migrants. Global Policy3 (2): 125–34.
82.
MilanovicB.2015. Global inequality of opportunity: How much of our income is determined by where we live?Review of Economics and Statistics97 (2): 452–60.
83.
MohunS.2004. The labour theory of value as foundation for empirical investigations. Metroeconomica55 (1): 65–95.
84.
MollickA. V.FariaJ. R.AlbuquerqueP. H.León-LedesmaM. A.2008. Can globalisation stop the decline in commodities’ terms of trade?Cambridge Journal of Economics32 (5): 683–701.
85.
MoseleyF.2016. Money and Totality: A Macro-monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem.”Leiden: Brill.
86.
NakajimaA.IzumiH.1995. Economic development and unequal exchange among nations: Analysis of the U.S., Japan, and South Korea. Review of Radical Political Economics27 (3): 86–94.
87.
NicholasH.2011. Marx’s Theory of Price and Its Modern Rivals. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
88.
NordlundC.2014. Preceding and governing measurements: An Emmanuelian conceptualization of ecological unequal exchange. In Structures of the World Political Economy and the Future of Global Conflict and Cooperation, eds. SuterC.Chase-Dunn, 315–346C.Berlin: LIT Verlag.
89.
OcampoJ.1986. New developments in trade theory and LDCs. Journal of Development Economics22 (1): 129–70.
90.
PalloixC.1970. La question de l’échange inégal: Une critique de l’économie politique. L’Homme et la Société18: 5–33.
91.
PrebischR.1959. Commercial policy in the underdeveloped countries. The American Economic Review49 (2): 251–73.
92.
RafferK.1987. Unequal Exchange and the Evolution of the World System: Reconsidering the Impact of Trade on North-South Relations. New York: Macmillan.
93.
RafferK.2006. Differences between inequalities and unequal exchange: Comments on the papers by Chaves and Köhler. Entelequia: Revista Interdisciplinar2: 197–200.
94.
RamR.2004. Trends in developing countries’ commodity terms-of-trade since 1970. Review of Radical Political Economics36 (2): 241–53.
95.
Ramos-MartinezA.1995. The monetary expression of labour: Marx’s twofold measure of value. Paper presented at the Eastern Economic Association Conference, New York, March.
96.
Ramos-MartinezA.1998. Value and price of production: New evidence on Marx’s transformation procedure. International Journal of Political Economy28 (4): 55–81.
97.
ReichU. P.2007. Inequality in exchange: The use of a world trade flow table for analyzing the international economy. Economic Systems Research19 (4): 375–95.
98.
ReichU. P.2014. Inequality in global production and trade: A proposal for measurement. Paper presented at IARIW 33rd General Conference, Rotterdam, Netherlands, August.
99.
RieuD. M.2006. A reexamination of the quantitative issues in the New Interpretation. Review of Radical Political Economics38 (2): 258–71.
RieuD. M.2009. The “New Interpretation”: Questions answered and unanswered. Metroeconomica60 (3): 568–70.
102.
RieuD. M.LeeK.AhnH. H. 2014. The determination of the monetary expression of concrete labor time under the inconvertible credit money system. Review of Radical Political Economics46 (2): 190–98.
103.
RobertsB.2004. Value, abstract labor, and exchange equivalence. In The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics, eds. FreemanA.KlimanA.WellsJ., 107–134. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.
104.
RobertsB.2005. Quantifying abstract labor: “Aliquot part” reasoning in Marx’s value theory. Research in Political Economy22: 137–70.
105.
Rodríguez-HerreraA.1996. Money, the postulates of invariance and the transformation of Marx into Ricardo. In Marx and Non-equilibrium economics, eds. FreemanA.CarchediG., 49–76. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.
106.
RogoffK.1996. The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature34 (2): 647–68.
107.
RubinI. I.1973. Essays on Marx’s Labor Theory of Value. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
108.
Saad-FilhoA.1993. A note on Marx’s analysis of the composition of capital. Capital & Class17 (2): 127–46.
109.
Saad-FilhoA.1996. The value of money, the value of labour power and the net product: An appraisal of the “New Approach” to the transformation problem. In Marx and Non-equilibrium Economics, eds. FreemanA.CarchediG.
116–35. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.
110.
Saad-FilhoA.1997. Concrete and abstract labour in Marx’s theory of value. Review of Political Economy9 (4): 457–77.
111.
SchottP. K.2004. Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics119 (2): 647–78.
112.
SelwynB.2012. Beyond firm-centrism: Re-integrating labour and capitalism into global commodity chain analysis. Journal of Economic Geography12 (1): 205–26.
113.
SelwynB.2015. Commodity chains, creative destruction and global inequality: A class analysis. Journal of Economic Geography15 (2): 253–74.
114.
SeretisS. A.TsalikiP. V.2012. Value transfers in trade: An explanation of the observed differences in development. International Journal of Social Economics39 (12): 965–82.
115.
SeretisS. A.TsalikiP. V.2015. Absolute advantage and international trade. Review of Radical Political Economics48 (3): 438–51.
116.
ShaikhA.1980. On the laws of international exchange. In Growth, Profits, and Property: Essays in the Revival of Political Economy, ed. NellE. J., 204–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
117.
SheppardE.1990. The Howard G. Roepke Lecture in economic geography modeling the capitalist space economy: Bringing society and space back. Economic Geography66 (3): 201–28.
118.
SheppardE.2012. Trade, globalization and uneven development: Entanglements of geographical political economy. Progress in Human Geography36 (1): 44–71.
119.
SingerH. W.1950. The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. The American Economic Review40 (2): 473–85.
120.
SomainiE.1973. Sulle differenze tra i livelli salariali in diversi paesi: Critica delle tesi di Arghiri Emmanuel. In Salari, Sottosviluppo e Imperialismo: Un Dibattito Sullo Scambio Ineguale, eds. SomainiE.EmmanuelA.BoggioL.SalvatiM.3–50. Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
121.
SomelC.2003. Estimating the surplus in the periphery: An application to Turkey. Cambridge Journal of Economics27 (6): 919–33.
122.
SomelC.2005. Commodity chains, unequal exchange and uneven development (Working Paper). Ankara: Economic Research Center.
123.
SubasatT.2013. Can differences in international prices measure unequal exchange in international trade?Competition & Change17 (4): 372–79.
124.
TauschA.2005. Tectonic shifts in the structures of international inequality? (Working Paper No. 10). Buenos Aires: Centro Argentino de Estudios Internacionales.
125.
ThirlwallA. P.2015. A general model of growth and development on Kaldorian Lines. In Essays on Keynesian and Kaldorian Economics, ed. ThirwallA. P. 302–25. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
126.
TimmerM. P.DietzenbacherE.LosB.StehrerR.VriesG. J.2015. An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics23 (3): 575–605.
127.
ToyeJ. F. J.ToyeR.2003. The origins and interpretation of the Prebisch-Singer thesis. History of Political Economy35 (3): 437–67.
128.
TsalikiP.ParaskevopoulouC.TsoulfidisL.2017. Unequal exchange and absolute cost advantage: Evidence from the trade between Greece and Germany. Cambridge Journal of Economics. doi:10.1093/cje/bex060.
129.
WebberM. J.FootS. P. H.1984. The measurement of unequal exchange. Environment and Planning A16 (7): 927–47.
130.
WilliamsK. M.1985. Is “unequal exchange” a mechanism for perpetuating inequality in the modern world system?Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID)20 (3): 47–73.
131.
World Trade Organization. 2011. International Trade Statistical, Appendix: Historical Trends. World Trade Organization. www.wto.org/statistics.
