The paper challenges the idea that neoclassical economics has demonstrated competition’s efficiency. It does so by retracing the history of Pareto’s criterion (in general equilibrium and in modern neoclassical economics), showing that it is only after a few shifts and transformations that it became an “efficiency” criterion while it was never called that in Pareto’s work. Widespread belief that competition is efficient is rather the result of ideology than of rigorous neoclassical demonstration.
AllaisMaurice.1967. Les conditions de l’efficacité dans l’économie, IV seminario internazionalé, Rapallo, 12–14 settembre 1967. Milano: Centro studi e ricerche su problemi economico-sociali.
4.
AllaisMaurice.2006. Economie pure et rendement social. Paris: Dalloz.
ArrowKenneth.1963. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. The American Economic Review53 (5): 941–73.
7.
ArrowKenneth.1974. Limited knowledge and economic analysis. The American Economic Review64 (1): 1–10.
8.
ArrowKenneth.1985. The potentials and limits of the market in resource allocation. In Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare, ed. FeiwelG. R., 107–24. London: Macmillan.
9.
ArrowKennethHahnFrank. 1971. General Competitive Analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
10.
BerthonnetIrèneDelcliteThomas. 2014. Pareto-optimality or Pareto-efficiency: Same concept, different names? An analysis over a century of economic literature. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology32: 129–45.
11.
BerthoudArnaud.1988. Economie politique et morale chez Walras. Economies et Sociétés, série PE9: 65–93.
12.
DebreuGérard.1974. Excess demand functions. Journal of Mathematical Economics1 (1): 15–21.
13.
DesreumauxVincent.2008. La justice sociale dans l’économie du bien-être: Sortie par la porte et rentrée par la fenêtre? Histoire et analyse de l’émergence du concept d’équité comme absence d’envie. Economies et Sociétés42 (5): 893–930.
14.
DesreumauxVincent.2013. Équilibre général et justice sociale: la théorie néoclassique comme philosophie politique?Cahiers d’économie Politique/Papers in Political Economy64 (1): 75–110.
15.
FavereauOlivier.1989. Organisation et marché. Revue française d’économie4 (1): 65–96.
16.
FriedmanMilton.1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
HenryJohn.2009. The illusion of the epoch: Neoclassical economics as a case study. Studi e Note di Economia1:27–44.
19.
HicksJohn R.1939. The foundations of welfare economics. The Economic Journal49 (196): 696–712.
20.
HicksJohn R.1946. Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21.
HicksJohn R.1975. The scope and status of welfare economics. Oxford Economic Papers27 (3): 307–26.
22.
KaldorNicholas.1939. Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. The Economic Journal49 (195): 549–52.
23.
LangeOskar.1942. The foundations of welfare economics. Econometrica10 (3/4): 215–28.
24.
MantelRolf.1974. On the characterization of aggregate excess demand. Journal of Economic Theory7 (3): 348–53.
25.
MarchionattiRoberto.1999. The methodological foundations of pure and applied economics in Pareto: An anti-Walrasian programme. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales37 (116): 277–94.
26.
MarchionattiRoberto.2006. At the origin of post-war mainstream of economics: On Pareto’s influence on economic theory. International Review of Economics53 (4): 538–59.
27.
MarchionattiRobertoGambinoEncino. 1997. The contribution of Vilfredo Pareto to the new theories of economics in the years of theCours d’économie politique. History of Economic Ideas3: 49–64.
28.
MarglinStephen.1974. What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Review of Radical Political Economy6 (2): 60–112.
29.
MarglinStephen.1975. What do bosses do? Part II. Review of Radical Political Economics7 (1): 20–37.
30.
MitchellWilliamWattsMartin. 1985. Efficiency under capitalist production: A critique and reformulation. Review of Radical Political Economics17 (1): 212–20.
31.
MornatiFiorenzo2013. Pareto optimality in the work of Pareto. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales51 (2): 65–82.
32.
ParetoVilfredo1894. Il massimo di utilità dato dalla libera concorrenza. In Ecrits d’Économie Pure, vol. 26, ed. BusinoGiovanni, 276–94. Genève: Droz.
33.
ParetoVilfredo1898. Comment se pose le problème de l’économie pure? In Marxisme et économie pure, ed. Busino.Giovanni102–109. Genève: Droz.
34.
ParetoVilfredo1963 [1909]. Manuel d’Économie Politique. 2nd éd. Paris: Librairie général de droit et de jurisprudence.
35.
ParetoVilfredo1916. Traité de Sociologie Générale. Genève: Droz.
36.
ParetoVilfredo1971. Manual of Political Economy. Trans. SchwierA. London: Macmillan.
37.
RobbinsLionel.1947. Essai sur la nature et la signification de la science économique. Paris: Editions politiques, économiques et sociales.
38.
SamuelsonPaul A.1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
SonnenscheinHugo F.1973. Do Walras’ identity and continuity characterize the class of community excess demand functions?Journal of Economic Theory6 (4): 345–54.
41.
SteinerPhilippe.1995. Vilfredo Pareto et le protectionnisme: l’économie politique appliquée, la sociologie générale et quelques paradoxes. Revue Économique46 (5): 1241–62.
42.
StiglitzJoseph E.2002. Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. The American Economic Review92 (3): 460–501.
