Jeon and Vernengo apply Okun’s Law and Verdoorn’s Law to examine the cyclical and structural effects of output growth on productivity. Their estimation method, however, is flawed, and their results are not robust. New estimates indicate that less of the variation in labor productivity growth is explained, that the Verdoorn and Okun coefficients are unstable over time, and that the results after 1973 are inconsistent with Kaldor’s interpretation of Verdoorn’s Law.
BallL.LeighD.LounganiP.2013. Okun’s Law: Fit at Fifty? NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 18668. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
BasuD.FoleyD.2013. Dynamics of output and employment in the US economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics37: 1077–106.
3.
Congressional Budget Office. 2016. The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2016 to 2026. http://www.cbo.gov.
JeonY.VernengoM.2008. Puzzles, paradoxes, and regularities: Cyclical and structural productivity in the United States (1950–2005). Review of Radical Political Economics40 (3): 237–43.
6.
KaldorN.1966. Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
KnotekE.2007. How useful is Okun’s Law?Economic Review92(4): 73–103.
8.
OkunA.1962. Potential output: Its measurement and significance. In Proceedings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section, 98–104. Alexandria: American Statistical Association.
9.
VerdoornP. [1949] 1993. On the factors determining the growth of labor productivity. In Italian Economic Papers, ed. PasinettiL., vol. II, 59–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
