With the help of the regulationist theory of the wage-labor nexus and the historical sociology of the wage system, this article questions the limitations of Arendt’s concept of the “social.” To provide a fully relevant political theory, Arendt is missing the idea of institutional and collective supports for the effective exercise of democracy by the greatest number, which is precisely the subject which Castel’s historical analyses stressed with the concept of “social property.”
BoltanskiL. (2009) 2011. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
Bowen-MooreP.1989. Hannah Arendt’s Philosophy of Natality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
BoyerR.1993. Labour institutions and economic growth: A survey and a “regulationist” approach. Labour7 (1): 25–72.
15.
BoyerR. eds. 2002. Regulation Theory: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.
16.
CalhounC. eds. 1997. Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
CanovanM.1992. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
CastelR. (1995) 2002. From Manual Workers to Wage Laborers: Transformation of the Social Question. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
19.
CastelR.2009. La montée des incertitudes: Travail, protection et statut de l’individu. Paris: Le Seuil.
20.
CastelR.HarocheC.2001. Propriété privée, propriété sociale et propriété de soi. Paris: Fayard.
21.
CastoriadisC.1992. Political and Social Writings: Volume 3: 1961–1979. Recommencing the Revolution: From Socialism to the Autonomous Society. Ed. and Trans. David AmesCurtis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
ChevalierL. (1967) 2000. Laboring Classes and Dangerous Classes: In Paris during the First Half of the Nineteenth Century. New York: Howard Fertig.
23.
DonzelotJ.1984. L’invention du social. Paris: Le Seuil.
24.
Esping-AndersenG.1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Princeton University Press.
25.
EwaldF.1986. L’Etat-providence. Paris: Grasset.
26.
FoucaultM.2004. Naissance du biopolitique. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil.
27.
FouilléeA.1884. La propriété sociale et la démocratie. Paris: Librairie Hachette et Cie.
28.
HayekL.1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
29.
HayekL.1988. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30.
LotringerS. eds. 2001. French Theory in America. New York: Routledge.
31.
MarkusG.1986. Language and Production. Boston: Springer.
32.
McCarthyM.1979. On Hanna Arendt. In Hanna Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, ed. HillM. A., 18–45. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
33.
McClureK. M.2008. Retour sur la question sociale. In Hannah Arendt Abroad: Lectures du Monde, ed. KupiecA.LeiboviciM.MuhlmannG.TassinE. (Tumultes, no. 30, May), 125–60. Paris: Editions Kimé.
34.
PitkinH. F.1998. The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35.
PolanyiK.1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
36.
SahlinsM.2008. The Western Illusion of Human Nature. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
37.
SheldonG. W.2007. The History of Political Theory: Ancient Greece to Modern America. New York: Peter Lang.
38.
SobelR.2011. Necessity and liberty in the communist utopia: André Gorz’s rereading of Marx. Rethinking Marxism23 (2): 265–81.
39.
SobelR.PostelN.2014. Conceptualising the labour-money connection: A critical re-examination of Benetti and Cartelier’s Marchands, salariat et capitalists. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics7 (1): 56–85.
40.
VillaD. R.1995. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
