Radical critics have long impugned conventional economists as ideologically committed to capitalism and blind to its historical dynamics and crisis tendencies. This report evaluates this longstanding criticism. Surveying academic economists in the United States, we find the field quite skeptical of the prospects of capitalist crises. Despite considerable consensus, political orientation is a highly significant predictor of respondents’ outlooks. We close by interpreting our findings from the standpoint of current research in political psychology.
FuchsV. R.KruegerA. B.PoterbaJ. M.1998. Economists’ views about parameters, values, and policies: Survey results in labor and public economics. Journal of Economic Literature36:1387–1425.
6.
Fuentes-NievaR.GalassoN.2014. Working for the few: Political capture and economic inequality. Oxfam Briefing Paper 178. Oxford: Oxfam.
7.
FullerD.Geide-StevensonD.2003. Consensus among economists: Revisited. The Journal of Economic Education34 (4): 369–87.
GordonR.DahlG. B.2013. Views among economists: Professional consensus or point-counterpoint?American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings102 (3): 629–35.
10.
HaidtJ.2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review108:814–34.
11.
HaidtJ.2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Vintage.
HarringtonM.1968. Toward a Democratic Left: A Radical Program for a New Majority. New York: Macmillan.
14.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R.2013. Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences. New York: Routledge.
15.
HorowitzM.YaworskyW.KickhamK.2014. Whither the blank slate? A report on the reception of evolutionary biological ideas among sociological theorists. Sociological Spectrum34 (6): 489–509.
16.
JostJ. T.2009. “Elective affinities”: On the psychological bases of left–right differences. Psychological Inquiry20 (2–3): 129–41.
17.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L.2009. Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology60:307–37.
18.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D.2008. Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science3 (2): 126–36.
19.
KearlJ. R.PopeC. L.WhitingG. C.WimmerL. T.1979. A confusion of economists?The American Economic Review69:28–37.
20.
KleinD. B.SternC.2007. Is there a free-market economist in the house? The policy views of American economic association members. American Journal of Economics and Sociology66 (2): 309–34.
21.
KleinN.2014. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.
LeeF. S.2004. To be a heterodox economist: The contested landscape of American economics, 1960s and 1970s. Journal of Economic Issues38 (3): 747–63.
25.
LeeF. S.2012. Heterodox economics and its critics. Review of Political Economy24 (2): 337–351.
26.
MagdoffF.FosterJ. B.2011. What Every Environmentalist Needs to Know about Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
27.
MarxK.1993. Grundrisse. London: Penguin.
28.
McNallyD.2011. Global Slump: The Economics and Politics of Crisis and Resistance. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
29.
MilonakisD.2012. Neoclassical economics. In The Elgar Companion to Marxist Economics, ed. FineB.Saad-FilhoA.BoffoM., 246–51. Gloucestershire: Edward Elgar.
30.
MooneyC.2012. The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science–and Reality. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.