The paper argues that capital adequacy regulation has served to recreate the neoliberal form of capitalist social relations. It identifies two dimensions to this process. First, the paper argues that capital adequacy regulation in historical perspective can be understood to have incentivized, facilitated, and legitimated the kind of arbitrage that allow it to proceed. Second, it argues revisions to capital adequacy requirements serve to discipline mutual and cooperative forms of finance.
AlfonI.ArgimonI.Bascunana-AmbrosP.2004. What determines how much capital is held by UK banks and building societies. London: Financial Services Authority.
3.
BakerA.2010. Restraining regulatory capture? Anglo-America, crisis politics and trajectories of change in global financial governance. International Affairs86 (3): 647–63.
4.
BakerA.2013. The new political economy of the macroprudential ideational shift. New Political Economy18 (1): 112–39. doi:10.1080/13563467.2012.662952.
5.
BakerA.2014. Transnational technocracy and the macroprudential paradox. In Transnational Financial Regulation after the Crisis, ed. PorterT., 29–49. London: Routledge.
6.
Bank of England. 2013. Strengthening capital standards and implementing CRD IV (Consultation Paper CP5/13). London: Bank of England.
7.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 1988. International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards. Basel, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements.
8.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 1999. A New Capital Adequacy Framework. Basel, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements.
9.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2010. Basel III: A global regulatory framework for banks and banking systems. Basel, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements.
10.
BirchallJ.2010. Finance in an Age of Austerity: The Power of Customer Owned Banks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
11.
BlumJ.1999. Do capital adequacy requirements reduce risks in banking?Journal of Banking & Finance23:755–71.
BuckleyJ.HowarthD.QuagliaL.2012. Internal market: The ongoing struggle to “protect” Europe from its money men. Journal of Common Market Studies50 (s2): 99–115.
14.
Building Societies Association. 2009. Converting failed financial institutions into mutual organisations. London: Building Societies Association.
15.
Building Societies Association. 2010. Response to two Basel consultations. London: Building Societies Association.
CrottyJ.2009. Structural causes of the global financial crisis: A critical assessment of the “new financial architecture.”Cambridge Journal of Economics33 (4): 563–80.
18.
CrouchC.2009. Privatised Keynesianism: An unacknowledged policy regime. British Journal of Politics and International Relations11 (3): 382–99.
19.
de GoedeM. 2004. Repoliticizing financial risk. Economy and Society33 (2): 197–217.
European Union. 2013. Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No. 648/2012. Official Journal of the European Union (L321/6-L321/342). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32013R0575
HansonS.KashyapA. K.SteinJ. C.2011. A macroprudential approach to financial regulation. Journal of Economic Perspectives25 (1): 3–28.
29.
HarveyD.2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
HelleinerE.PagliariS.2009. Towards a new Bretton Woods? The first G20 leaders summit and the regulation of global finance. New Political Economy14 (2): 275–87.
31.
HesseH.CihakM.2007. Cooperative banks and financial stability (IMF Working Paper WP/07/02). Washington DC: IMF.
32.
HM Treasury. 2010. Building society capital and related issues: A discussion paper. London: HM Treasury.
33.
HowarthD.QuagliaL.2013. Banking on stability: The political economy of new capital requirements in the European Union. European Integration35 (3): 333–346.
JonesD.2000. Emerging problems with the Basel Capital Accord: Regulatory capital arbitrage and related issues. Journal of Banking & Finance24 (1): 35–58.
36.
JossaB.2005. Marx, Marxism and the cooperative movement. Cambridge Journal of Economics29 (1): 3–18.
37.
JossaB.2012. Cooperative firms as a new mode of production. Review of Political Economy24 (3): 399–416.
38.
KotzD. M.2008. Neoliberalism and financialization. Paper prepared for Conference in Honour of Jane D’Arista, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst, May 2–3.
39.
MichieJ.2011. Promoting corporate diversity in the financial services sector. Policy Studies32 (4): 309–23.
40.
MullardM.2012. The credit rating agencies and their contribution to the financial crisis. The Political Quarterly83 (1): 77–95.
PaudynB.2013. Credit rating agencies and the sovereign debt crisis: Performing the politics of creditworthiness through risk and uncertainty. Review of International Political Economy20 (4): 788–818. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.720272.
43.
RethelL.2014. Bank regulation after the global financial crisis: The case of regulatory arbitrage. In Transnational Financial Regulation after the Crisis, ed. PorterT., 72–90. London: Routledge.
44.
RethelL.SinclairT.2012. The Problem with Banks. London: Zed Books.
45.
SchwartzH.2008. Housing, global finance, and American hegemony: Building conservative politics one brick at a time. Comparative European Politics6 (2): 262–84.
46.
SeabrookeL. 2007. Everyday legitimacy and international financial orders: The social sources of imperialism and hegemony in global finance. New Political Economy12 (1): 1–18.
