In the context of great diversity and profound social inequalities, environmental injustice prevails. Conflicts between institutions promoting economic development (i.e., growth) and ecologists and civil society are rampant. This paper introduces alternatives emerging from groups, whose organizations are shaped by different cosmologies, products of their multiple ethnic origins, and by the profound philosophic and epistemological debates among social movements proposing different strategies for achieving progress, improving well-being and conserving ecosystems.
BaranP.1957. The Political Economy of Growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
2.
BarkinD.2001. Innovaciones Mexicanas en el Manejo del Agua. México: Centro de Ecología y Desarrollo.
3.
——— 2012. Communities constructing their own alternatives in the face of crisis. Mountain Research and Development32 (Suppl. 1): S12–22.
4.
———. 2013. Viviendo el pacto fáustico. La resiliencia perversa frente al cambio climático. Veredas14 (27): 7–19.
5.
BarkinD.FuenteM.2013. Community forest management: Can the green economy contribute to environmental justice?Natural Resources Forum37 (3): 200–10.
6.
BarkinD.KloosterD.2006. Water Management Strategies in Urban Mexico: Limitations of the Privatization Debate (Working paper). Patel Center, University of South Florida. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15423.
7.
BarkinD.LemusB.2014. Rethinking the social and solidarity society in light of community practice. Sustainability6 (9): 432–45.
8.
———. 2016. Local solutions for environmental justice. In Environmental Governance in Latin America: Conflicts, Projects and Possibilities, ed. De CastroF.HogenboomB.Baud, 257–286.M.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BaronnetB.Mora BayoM.Stahler-SholkR.2011. Luchas “muy otras.” Zapatismo y autonomía en las comunidades indígenas de Chiapas. Mexico: CIESAS/UNACH/UAM.
BollierD.HelfrichS.2012. The Wealth of the Commons. Amherst: The Levellers Press.
12.
CronkletonP.BrayD. B.MedinaG.2011. Community forest management and the emergence of multi-scale governance institutions: Lessons for REDD+ development from Mexico, Brazil and Bolivia. Forests2 (2): 451–73.
13.
Delgado LemusA.CasasA.TellezO.2014. Distribution, abundance and traditional management of Agave potatorum in the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico: Bases for sustainable use of non-timber forest products. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine10:63.
14.
DemarisA.2007. La Via Campesina: Globalization and the Power of Peasants. London: Pluto Books.
15.
DietrichW.Echavarría AlvarezJ.EstevaG.IngruberD.KoppensteinerN.2011. Peace Studies: A Cultural Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
EscobarA.2011. Sustainability: Design for the pluriverse. Development54 (2): 137–40.
17.
EstevaG.2014. Commoning in the new society. Community Development Journal49 (Suppl. 1): i144–59.
18.
———. 2015. The hour of autonomy. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies10 (1): 134–45.
19.
FuntowiczS. O.RavetzJ. R.1991. A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In Ecological Economics: Concepts and Methods, ed. CostanzaR., 137–152. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
GonzalesT.2014. Kawsay (Buen Vivir) y afirmación cultural: Pratec-Naca, un paradigma alternativo en los Andes. In El Buen Vivir y descolonialidad: Critica al desarrollo y la racionalidad instrumentals, ed. MarañónB., 119–137. Mexico: UNAM-Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas.
Illsley GranichC.2007. El Grupo de Estudios Ambientales, AC: Entre la acción social y la consolidación institucional. In Investigación y cambio social. Desafíos para las ONG en Centroamérica y México, ed. BebbingtonA. J., 175–208. Guatemala: Escuela de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo.
23.
KothariA.DemariaF.AcostaA.2014. Buen Vivir, degrowth and ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the Green Economy. Development57 (3–4): 362–75.
24.
LinebaughP.2013. The Magna Carta Manifest: Liberties and Commons for All. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
McDermottM. (ed.). 2014. Introduction, commons sense: New thinking about an old idea. Community Development Journal49 (Suppl. 1): i1–i11.
26.
Muñoz RamírezG. 2008. The Fire and the Word: A History of the Zapatista Movement. San Francisco: City Lights Publishers.
27.
OstromE.1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PolanyiK.2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Times. Boston: Beacon Press.
30.
RossetP. M.2013. Re-thinking agrarian reform, land and territory in La Vía Campesina. Journal of Peasant Studies40 (4): 721–75.
31.
ThompsonE. P. (1959) 2014. Commitment in politics. In E.P. Thompson and the Making of the New Left, ed. WinslowC., 103–16. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
32.
ToledoV.Ortiz EspejelB.2014. México, Regiones que Caminan Hacia la Sustentabilidad: Una geopolítica de las resistencias bioculturales. Puebla: Universidad Iberoamericana.
33.
VachonR.1995. Guswenta or the intercultural imperative: Towards a re-enacted peace accord between the Mohawk nation and the North American Nation-States (and their peoples). Interculture JournalXXVIII (2, 3, 4): 127–29.
34.
Vergara-CamusL.2014. Land and Freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and Peasant Alternatives to Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books.
35.
WalljasperJ.2010. All That We Share: A Field Guide to the Commons. New York: The New Press.
