We argue that corporate social responsibility depends on two distinct stylized facts concerning régulation and power. The first—institutional CSR—is institutional in nature, the other—strategic CSR—is economic and productive. The former permits and stabilizes the latter, which in turn gives rise to political compromises structuring institutional mechanisms. CSR strategies and institutions correspond to a private, oligopolistic régulation which shows no signs of being able to pursue a sustainable development regime.
AgliettaM.RebériouxA.2005. Corporate governance adrif: A critique of shareholder value. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
2.
BanerjeeS. B.2011. Voices of the governed: Towards a theory of the translocal. Organization18 (3): 323-344.
3.
BlairM.2000. The new relationship: Human capital in the American corporation. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
4.
BodetC.LamarcheT.2007. La responsabilité sociale des entreprises comme innovation institutionnelle: Une lecture régulationniste. Revue de la Régulation1.
5.
BodetC.LamarcheT.2012. Du rapport de développement durable au rapport CHSCT: Tension sur l’expertise sociale dans l’entreprise. In La souffrance au travail: Quelle responsabilité de l’entreprise? ed. BardelliP.AlloucheJ., 103-120. Paris: A. Colin.
6.
BoltanskiL.ChiapelloE.2006. The new spirit of capitalism, trans. ElliotG.Verso Books.
7.
BoyerR.2000. Is a finance-led growth regime a viable alternative to Fordism? A preliminary analysis. Economy and Society29 (1): 111-145.
8.
BoyerR.SaillardY. eds. 2002. Régulation theory: The state of the art, trans. ShreadC.London and New York: Routledge.
9.
BowenH. R.1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Brothers.
10.
CapronM.PetitP.2011. RSE et diversité des capitalismes dans la phase contemporaine d’internationalisation. Revue de la Régulation9.
11.
CapronM.Quairel-LanoizeléeF.TurcotteM.-F.2011. ISO 26 000: Une norme “hors norme”?Paris: Economica.
12.
ChandlerA. D.Jr.1990. Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
13.
ChanteauJ.-P.2011. L’économie de la responsabilité sociétale d’entreprise: Éléments de méthode institutionnaliste. Revue de la régulation9.
14.
ChiapelloE.2013. Capitalism and its criticisms. In New spirits of capitalism, ed. du GaryP.MorganG.Oxford University Press.
15.
CollinsH.1990. Ascription of legal personality to groups in complex patterns of economic integration. The Modern Law Review53 (6): 731-744.
16.
DannreutherC.PetitP.2013. Introduction to the special issue on the regulation approach and the contemporary crisis. Capital & Class37 (1): 3-4.
17.
DescolongesM.2006. Implications for French unions involved in international framework agreements. International conference on Global Companies-Global Unions-Global Research-Global Campaigns, New York.
18.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W.1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48.
19.
Dubuisson-QuellierS.2013. A market mediation strategy: How social movements seek to change firms’ practices by promoting new principles of product valuation. Organization Studies, May.
20.
DuménilG.LévyD.2011. The crisis of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Eymard-DuvernayF.1989. Conventions de qualité et pluralité des formes de coordination. Revue Économique2: 329-359.
22.
FligsteinN.1990. The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
23.
GereffiG.HumphreyJ.SturgeonT.2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy12 (1): 78-104.
24.
HallP.SoskiceD. eds. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
HussonM.2010. Le partage de la valeur ajoutée en Europe. La Revue de l’IRES64 : 47-92.
26.
JessopB.1990. Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect. Economy and Society19 (2): 153-216.
27.
LamarcheT.RubinsteinM.2012. Dynamics of corporate social responsibility: Towards a new ‘conception of control’?Journal of Institutional Economics8 (2): 161-186.
28.
LordonF.1999. Le nouvel agenda de la politique économique en régime d’accumulation financiarisé. In Le triangle infernal: Crise, mondialisation, financiarisation, ed. DuménilGLévyD.Paris: PUF.
29.
MargolisJ.ElfenbeinH. A.2008. Doing well by doing good? Don’t count on it. Harvard Business Review86 (1): 19-20.
30.
Martinez-AlierJ.PascualU.VivienF. D.ZaccaiE.2010. Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics69: 1,741–1,747.
31.
MichaletC.-A.1985. Le capitalisme mondial. Paris: PUF.
32.
MichelS.2013, Wage form and social spending in the long run. EAEPE Conference, Paris, Nov. 7-9.
33.
MillerJ.2008. The ongoing legitimacy project: Corporate philanthropy as protective strategy. European Management Review (5): 151-164.
34.
MilbergW.2008. Shifting sources and uses of profits: Sustaining US financialization with global value chains. Economy and Society37 (3): 420-451.
35.
OrléanA.2014. The empire of value: A new foundation for economics, trans. DeBevoiseM. B.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
PalpacuerF.2008. Bringing the social context back in: Governance and wealth distribution in global commodity chains. Economy and Society37 (3): 393-419.
37.
PorterM.KramerM.2006. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review Spotlight, December.
38.
SetterfieldM.2011. Anticipations of the crisis: On the similarities between post-Keynesian economics and regulation theory. Revue de la Régulation10.
39.
StorperM.2000. Conventions and institutions: Rethinking problems of state reform, governance, and policy. In Institutions and the role of the state, ed. BurlamaquiL.CastroA. C.ChangH.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
40.
WeinsteinO.2012. Firm, property and fovernance: From Berle and Means to the agency theory, and beyond. Accounting, Economics, and Law. A Convivium2 (2).
