The purpose of this research is to analyze the process of (re)constitution of urban commons by actors involved in action situations. What follows is a description of the way in which these actors are organized and (re)claim urban space, asserting their rights to the city, in relation to the introduced framework. For my analysis of two initiatives in Poland I propose the approach of Elinor Ostrom and address its limitations and critiques as well as outline further areas of research.
AnderiesJ. M.JanssenM. A.2013. Sustaining the commons. Tempe: Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University.
2.
Aristotle. 1984. Complete works of Aristotle, volume 2: The revised Oxford translation, ed. Barnes.J. Princeton/ Bollingen Series LXXI 2.
3.
BeckmannV.PadmanabhanM.2009. Analysing institutions: What method to apply? In Institutions and sustainability. Political economy of agriculture and the environment – Essays in honour of Konrad Hagedorn, ed. BeckmannV.PadmanabhanM., 341-371. Berlin: Springer.
4.
BollierD.HelfrichS. eds. 2012. The wealth of the commons. A world beyond market and state. Amherst: Levellers Press.
5.
BowlesS.1998. Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets on other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature36: 75-111.
6.
BromleyD. W.1992. The commons. Common property, and environmental policy. Environmental and Resource Economics2: 1-17.
GórskiR.2007. Bez państwa: Demokracja uczestnicząca w działaniu. Kraków: Korporacja Ha!art.
14.
HagedornK.2008. Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors. European Review of Agricultural Economics35 (3): 357-384.
15.
HardinG.1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science162 (1968): 1,243-1,248.
16.
HardtM.NegriA.2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
17.
HarveyD.2008. The right to the city. New Left Review53: 23-40.
18.
HarveyD.2012. Rebel cities. From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.
19.
HessC.OstromE.2007. Introduction: An overview of the knowledge commons. In Understanding knowledge as a commons. From theory to practice, ed. HessC.OstromE., 3-26. Cambridge: MIT Press.
JessopR.2002. The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
KassaD.2008. A tragedy of the “urban commons”? A case study of 2 public places in Addis Ababa. Paper presented at the conference Governing Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges, the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commons, Cheltenham, England, July 14-18.
24.
LefebvreH.1967. Le droit a la ville. L’Homme et la Societe6: 29-35.
25.
MarquettiA.Schonerwald da SilvaC. E.CampbellA.2012. Participatory economic democracy in action: Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, 1989–2004. Review of Radical Political Economics44 (1): 62-81.
26.
MelucciA.1996. Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
NelsonJ.2003. Confronting the science/value split: Notes on feminist economics, institutionalism, pragmatism and process thought. Cambridge Journal of Economics27: 49-64.
28.
NorthD.1994. Economic performance through time. American Economic Review84: 359-368.
29.
O’BrienD.2012. Managing the urban commons. The relative influence of individual and social incentives on the treatment of public space. Hum Nat23: 467-489.
30.
OlsonM.[1965] 1971. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31.
OstromE.1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
OstromE.1998. The institutional analysis and development approach. In Designing institutions for environmental and resource management, ed. Loehman TusakE.KilgourM., 68-90. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33.
OstromE.2005a. Understanding institutional diversity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
34.
OstromE.2005b. Doing institutional analysis. Digging deeper than markets and hierarchies. In Handbook of new institutional economics, ed. MenardC.ShirleyM. M., 819-848. Berlin: Springer.
35.
OstromE.2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science325: 419-422.
36.
OstromE.GardnerR.WalkerJ.1994. Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
37.
PaetzoldH.1996. The philosophical notion of the city. In City life: Essays on urban culture, ed. PaetzoldH.Maastricht: Jan Van Eyck Academie.
38.
PaetzoldH.2000. Symbol, culture, city. Maastricht: Jan Van Eyck Academie.
39.
PolanyiK.1957. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
40.
PortaD.DianiM.2006. Social movements. An introduction, 2nd ed.Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.
