This paper shows why attempts to test the neoclassical aggregate marginal productivity theory of distribution are inherently flawed. The use of constant-price value data and an underlying accounting identity mean that the close correspondence often found between the “output elasticities” of a putative aggregate production function and the relevant factor shares is a mere statistical artefact. Likewise, the results of estimating neoclassical labor demand functions must, for the same reason, always give spurious results.
Anadyke-DanesM.GodleyW.1989. Real wages and employment: A sceptical view of some recent empirical work. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies57 (2): 172-187.
2.
ArrowK. J.BernheimB. D.FeldsteinM. S.McFaddenD. L.PoterbaJ. M.SolowR. M.2011. 100 years of the American Economic Review: The top 20 articles. American Economic Review101(1): 1-8.
3.
BlaugM.1980. The methodology of economics: Or, how economists explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ClarkJ. B.1899. The distribution of wealth. New York: Macmillan.
5.
ClarkK. B.FreemanR. B.1980. How elastic is the demand for labor?Review of Economics and Statistics62 (4): 509-520.
6.
CobbC. W.DouglasP. H.1928. A theory of production. American Economic Review (supplement) 18 (1): 139-165.
7.
DouglasP. H.1934. The theory of wages. New York: Macmillan.
8.
DouglasP. H.1948. Are there laws of production?American Economic Review38 (1): 1-41.
9.
DouglasP. H.1976. The Cobb-Douglas production function once again: Its history, its testing, and some new empirical values. Journal of Political Economy84 (5): 903-915.
10.
EstrinS.LaidlerD.1995. Introduction to microeconomics. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
11.
FelipeJ.AdamsF. G.2005. A theory of production. The estimation of the Cobb-Douglas function: A retrospective view. Eastern Economic Journal31 (3): 427-46.
12.
FelipeJ.McCombieJ. S. L.2009. Are estimates of labour demand functions mere statistical artifacts?International Review of Applied Economics23 (2): 147-168.
13.
FelipeJ.McCombieJ. S. L.2013. The aggregate production function and the measurement of technical change. “Not even wrong”.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14.
FergusonC. E.1969. The neoclassical theory of production and distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (reprinted 1971).
15.
FergusonC. E.1971. Capital theory up to date: A comment on Mrs. Robinson’s article. Canadian Journal of Economics4 (2): 250-254.
16.
FisherF. M.1971. Aggregate production functions and the explanation of wages: A simulation experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics53 (4): 305-325.
17.
FisherF. M.1992. Aggregation. Aggregate production functions and related topics, ed. MonzJ.London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
18.
FisherF. M.2005. Aggregate production functions – a pervasive, but unpersuasive, fairytale. Eastern Economic Journal31 (3): 489-491.
19.
FriedmanM.1953. The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics, ed. FriedmanM., 3-43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
HamermeshD. S.1993. Labor demand. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
HarcourtG. C.1976. The Cambridge controversies: Old ways and new horizons – or dead end?Oxford Economic Papers28 (1): 25-65.
22.
HicksJ. R.1932. The theory of wages. London: Macmillan.
23.
HooverK. D.2012. Applied intermediate macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KuhnT.1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press (2nd ed.).
25.
LavoieM.2008. Neoclassical empirical evidence on employment and production laws as artefact. Research on Banking International and National Systems or Networks, Working Paper no. 09-09.
26.
LeeF. S.1998. Post-Keynesian price theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LewisP. E. T.MacDonaldG.2002. The elasticity of demand for labour in Australia. Economic Record78 (2,400): 18-30.
28.
McCombieJ. S. L.1998. Are there laws of production?: An assessment of the early criticisms of the Cobb-Douglas production function. Review of Political Economy10 (2): 141-173.
29.
MankiwN. G.TaylorM. P.2008. Macroeconomics. New York: Worth Publishers (European ed.).
30.
MendershausenH.1938. On the significance of Professor Douglas’ production function. Econometrica6 (2): 143-53. [A correction, ibid. 7: 1938.]
31.
MoseleyF.2015. The marginal productivity theory of capital in intermediate microeconomics textbooks: A critique. Review of Radical Political Economics47 (2): 292-308.
32.
Phelps BrownE. H.1957. The meaning of the fitted Cobb-Douglas function. Quarterly Journal of Economics71 (4): 546-560.
33.
RobinsonJ. V.1953-54. The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economic Studies21 (2): 81-106.
34.
ShaikhA.1974. Laws of production and laws of algebra: The humbug production function. Review of Economics and Statistics56 (1): 114-120.
35.
SimonH. A.1979. On parsimonious explanations of production relations. Scandinavian Journal of Economics81 (4): 459-474.
36.
SimonH. A.LevyF. K.1963. A note on the Cobb-Douglas function. Review of Economic Studies30 (2): 93-4.
37.
SolowR. M.1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics39 (3): 312-320.
38.
SolowR. M.1988. Growth theory and after. American Economic Review78 (3): 307-317.
39.
ThurowL. C.1975. Generating inequality. New York: Basic Books.
