The paper focuses on the “structural characteristics” of the Greek economy: domestic sectoral productive linkages, specialization profile, level of industrial and technological development, relative income elasticities of demand, international trade profile. Our analysis in these characteristics indicates that the Greek economy is a rather ‘‘extraverted” economy, within the EU frame. This “extraversion,” and not the labor costs, is the real cause of the Greek poor economic performance and low competitiveness. Input-output analysis confirms this suggestion.
Albala-BertrandJ. M.2006. Changes in Chile’s production structure, 1986-1996: Output and industrial interdependence. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean / ECLAC, CEPAL Review88: 159-172.
AminS.1976. Unequal development: An essay on the social formations of peripheral capitalism. Hassocks, Sussex: The Harvester Press.
4.
AnderssonM.GieseckA.PierluigiB.VidalisN.2008. Wage growth dispersion across the euro area countries: Some stylized facts. Occasional paper series 90. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.
5.
AthanasoglouP.2010. Imports: The role of trade structure and domestic supply. In Current account balance of Greece: Causes of unbalances and proposals of policy [in Greek], ed. OikonomouG.SabethaiI.SimigiannisG., 131-162. Athens: Bank of Greece.
6.
AthanasoglouP.GeorgiouE.BakinezouK.2010. Export performance of Greek economy: The effect of competitiveness and of trade composition, In Current account balance of Greece: Causes of unbalances and proposals of policy [in Greek], ed. OikonomouG.SabethaiI.SimigiannisG., 163-204. Athens: Bank of Greece.
7.
Bank of Greece. 2000. Annual report 1999. Athens.
8.
Bank of Greece. 2003. Annual report 2002. Athens.
9.
Bank of Greece. 2009a. Monetary policy 2008-2009. Athens.
10.
Bank of Greece. 2009b. Annual report 2008. Athens.
11.
Bank of Greece. 2010. Annual report 2009. Athens.
12.
Bank of Greece. 2012. Annual report 2011 [in Greek]. Athens.
13.
Bank of Greece. 2013. Summary of annual report 2012. Athens.
14.
CheneryH. B.WatanabeT.1958. International comparisons of the structure of production. Econometrica26(4): 487-521.
15.
CimoliM.PrimiA.PugnoM.2006. A low-growth model: Informality as a structural constraint. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean / ECLAC, CEPAL Review88: 85-102.
16.
Di MauroF.ForsterK.LimaA.2010. The global downturn and its impact on euro area exports and competitiveness. Occasional Paper Series No 119 / October: ECB.
17.
European Commission. 2005. EU sectoral competitiveness indicators. Luxembourg: European Communities.
18.
European Commission. 2009. EU industrial structure 2009: Performance and competitiveness. Luxembourg: European Communities.
FagerbergJ.1988. International competitiveness. The Economic Journal98: 355-374.
23.
FagerbergJ.1996. Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy12(3): 39-51.
24.
FelipeJ.KumarU.2011. Unit labor costs in the eurozone: The competitiveness debate again. Working Paper 651 – Levy Economics Institute of Bard College: 1-31. http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_651.pdf.
25.
FotopoulosT.1985. Dependent development: The Greek case [in Greek]. Athens: Exantas.
26.
FotopoulosT.2010. Greece as a protectorate of the supernational elite: The need for direct exit from the EU and for a self-reliant economy [in Greek]. Athens: Gordios.
27.
FurtadoC.1964. Development and underdevelopment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
GibsonH. D.2010. Sectoral growth of the Greek economy for the period 1995-2003. In Current account balance of Greece: Causes of unbalances and proposals of policy [in Greek], ed. OikonomouG.SabethaiI.SimigiannisG., 335-364. Athens: Bank of Greece.
29.
GuoJ.PlantingM. A.2000. Using input-output analysis to measure U.S. economic structural change over a 24 year period. The 13th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques. Macerata, Italy, August 21-28. www.bea.gov/papers/pdf/strucv7all.pdf.
30.
HirschmanA.1958. The strategy of economic development. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
31.
HoekstraR.van den BerghC. J. M.2003. Comparing structural decomposition analysis and index. Energy Economics25 (1): 139-164.
32.
HuntD.1989. Economics theories of development: An analysis of competing paradigms. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
33.
IlzkovitzF.DierxA.GalgauO.LeibK. (Internet). Trade performance and structural competitiveness. Developments in the euro area: Are member states equipped to meet the globalization challenges of the 21st century?: 1-30. http://research.stlouisfed.org/conferences/integration/Galgau-paper.pdf.
34.
INE [Institute of Labor] GSEE – ADEDY. 2009. The Greek economy and the employment: Annual report 2009 [in Greek].
35.
KaragiannisG.TzouvelekasV.2010. Sectoral linkages and industrial efficiency: A dilemma or a requisition in identifying development priorities?The Annals of Regional Sciences45: 207-233.
36.
KrugmanP.1989. Differences in income elasticities and trends in real exchange rates. European Economic Review33: 1,031-1,054.
LeontiefW.1936. Quantitative input and output relations in the economic system of the United States. The Review of Economic Statistics18 (3): 105-125.
39.
LeontiefW.1963. The structure of development. Scientific American209: 148-166.
40.
LeontiefW.1966. Input-output economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
LeontiefW.1986. The structure of development, ch. 8. In Input-output economics, LeontiefW., 162-187. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
LiargovasP.1998. The white paper on growth, competitiveness and employment and Greek small and medium sized enterprises. Small Business Economics11: 201-214.
43.
LoveJ. L.1980. Raul Prebisch and the origins of the doctrine of unequal exchange. Latin American Research Review15 (3): 45-72.
44.
MiliosJ.2002. Il capitalismo Greco, l’ Unione Europea e la Sinistra. Proteo, rivista a carattere scientifico di analisi delle dinamiche economico-produttive e di politiche del lavoro (Centro Studi Trasformazioni Economico-Sociali)3: 62-66. http://www.proteo.rdbcub.it/article.php3?id_article=214.
PeresW.2006. The slow comeback of industrial policies in Latin America and the Caribbean. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean / ECLAC, CEPAL Review88: 67-83.
53.
PilatD.WölflA.2005. Measuring the interaction between manufacturing and services. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, May. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/882376471514.
54.
PilatD.CimperA.OlsenK. B.WebbC.2006. The changing nature of manufacturing in OECD economies. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2006/09. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/308452426871.
55.
RasmussenN.1956. Studies in intersectoral relations. Amsterdam: North Holland.
56.
Rios-MoralesR.O’DonovanD.2006. Can the Latin American and Caribbean countries emulate the Irish model of FDI attraction?Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean / ECLAC, CEPAL Review88: 49-66.
57.
SarkarP.2001. The North-South terms of trade debate: A re-examination. Progress in Development Studies1 (4): 309-327.
58.
SingerH. W.1950. The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. The American Economic Review40 (2): 473-485.
59.
The World Bank. 2010. World development indicators.
60.
ThirlwallA. P.1979. The balance of payments constraint as an explanation of international growth differences. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review32 (128): 45-53.
