Government reports in India indicate that big farms are losing land in terms of absolute area as well as percentage of land. To understand the nature of accumulation I estimate the distribution of assets of cultivator households and distribution of land of operational landholdings, and examine how they change over time. It is found that the top fifteen percentiles of holdings have lost land share, the bottom fifty percentiles have gained land share. The share of assets of top fifteen percentiles cultivator households has gone up, the bottom fifty percentiles has also gained assets share. Distribution of land and assets of fifteen major states has been estimated. The paper discusses the possible causes and implications of these observations.
BasoleA.BasuD.2011a. Relations of production and modes of surplus extraction in India: Part I – Agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly46 (14): 41-58.
2.
BasoleA.BasuD.2011b. Relations of production and modes of surplus extraction in India: Part II – ‘Informal’ industry. Economic and Political Weekly46 (15): 63-79.
3.
BhaduriA.PatkarM.2009. Industrialisation for the people, by the people, of the people. Economic and Political Weekly44 (1): 10-14.
4.
BhallaG. S.SinghG.2009. Economic liberalisation and Indian agriculture: A statewise analysis. Economic and Political Weekly44 (52): 34-44.
5.
DjurfeldtG.1981. What happened to the agrarian bourgeoisie and rural proletariat under monopoly capitalism? Some hypotheses derived from the classics of Marxism on the agrarian question. Acta Sociologica24 (3): 167-191.
6.
DjurfeldtG.1982. What happened to the agrarian bourgeoisie and rural proletariat under monopoly capitalism? A reply to Michael Winter and Phil Raikes. Acta Sociologica25 (3): 295-299.
7.
Government of India. 1992a. Land and livestock holdings survey, NSS forty-eighth round, January- December 1992, Report 2: Operational land holdings in India. National Sampling Survey Organisation Report No. 407, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
8.
Government of India. 1992b. Debt and investment survey, NSS forty-eighth round, Household assets and liabilities, as on 30.6.1991. National Sampling Survey Organisation Report No. 419, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
9.
Government of India. 2005. Income, expenditure and productive assets of farmer households. NSS 59th round, National Sampling Survey Organisation Report No. 497, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
10.
Government of India. 2006a. Some aspects of operational land holdings in India, 2002-03. NSS 59th round, National Sampling Survey Organisation Report No. 492, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
11.
Government of India. 2006b. Household assets and liabilities in India (as on 30.06.2002). NSS 59th round, National Sampling Survey Organisation Report No. 500, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
12.
Government of India. 2011. Economic survey 2010-11. Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
13.
KarS.MarjitS.2009. Contemporary perspective on the informal labour market: Theory, policy and the Indian experience. Economic and Political Weekly44 (14): 60-71.
14.
KautskyK.1899. Die agrarfrage (The agrarian question). Stuttgart.
MarxK.1867 [1976]. Capital, vol. I. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
17.
MehrotraS.GandhiA.SahooB. K.SahaP.2012. Creating employment in the twelfth five-year plan. Economic and Political Weekly47 (19): 63-73.
18.
NelsonE.1983. Capitalism in Western agriculture: A comment. Acta Sociologica26 (3/4): 281-285.
19.
PapolaT. S.SahuP. P.2012. Growth and structure of employment in India. Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi
20.
PatnaikU., ed. 1990. Agrarian relations and accumulation: The ‘mode of production’ debate in India. Bombay: Sameeksha Trust and Oxford University Press.
21.
PatnaikU.2006. The agrarian crisis and importance of peasant resistance. People’s Democracy, Weekly organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist). http://pd.cpim.org/2006/0129/01292006_utsa.htm
22.
PurohitB.ReddyV. R.1999. Capital formation in Indian agriculture: Issues and concerns. Occasional Paper 8, NABARD.
23.
RaikesP.1982. Djurfeldt’s ‘What happened to the agrarian bourgeoisie and rural proletariat under monopoly capitalism?’ A comment. Acta Sociologica25 (2): 159-165.
24.
SinghI.1989. Reverse tenancy in Punjab agriculture: Impact of technological change. Economic and Political Weekly24 (25): A86-A92.
25.
ThornerA.1982a, 1982b, 1982c. Semi-feudalism or capitalism? Contemporary debate on classes and modes of production in India, I, II, III. Economic and Political Weekly17 (49): 1,961-1,968; 17 (50): 1,993-1,999; 17 (51): 2,061-2,066.
VaidyanathanA.1997. Performance of Indian agriculture since independence. In Agrarian questions, ed. BasuK., 18-74. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
