This paper argues that neoliberalism’s global restructuring of electricity sectors has failed to deliver its proclaimed objectives and spawned threats to economic growth, financial market stability, environmental degradation, and society’s well-being. Using the case study of Australia, the paper’s régulationist analysis reveals the short-term outcomes and longer-term consequences of this restructuring, and concludes that the paradox of this structural change is the creation of inherent risks to the accumulation process.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2010. Measures of Australia’s progress. Canberra: ABS.
2.
Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO). 2012. National electricity forecasting report. Canberra: AEMO.
3.
BattacharyaJ.DeLeireT.HaiderS.Currie.J.2003. Heat or eat? Cold-weather shocks and nutrition in poor American families. American Journal of Public Health93(7): 1,149-1,154.
4.
BeattyT.K.M.BlowL.CrossleyT.F.2011. Is there a heat or eat trade off in the UK?Institute of Fiscal Studies.
5.
BirdJ.CampbellR.Lawton.K.2010. The long cold winter: Beating fuel poverty. Institute for Public Policy Research and National Energy Action.
6.
BoardmanB.2010. Fixing fuel poverty: Challenges and solutions. London: Earthscan.
7.
BoyerR.1990. The regulation school: A critical introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
BuzarS.2007. Energy poverty in Eastern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
9.
ChesterL.2007. Who benefits from the restructuring of the Australian electricity sector?Journal of Economic IssuesXLI (4): 981-1,001.
10.
ChesterL.2012. Unravelling the roles played by derivatives and market power in electricity price formation. Refereed papers: 11thAnnual Conference, Australian Society of Heterodox Economists.
11.
ChesterL.Morris.A.2011. A new form of energy poverty is the hallmark of liberalised energy sectors. Australian Journal of Social Issues46(4): 435-459.
Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). 2011. Annual report on fuel poverty statistics. London: DECC.
14.
Energy Supply Association of Australia (ESAA). 2012. Electricity gas Australia. Melbourne: ESAA.
15.
GibbonsD.SinglerR.2008. Cold comfort: A review of coping strategies employed by households in fuel poverty. London: Centre for Social and Economic Inclusion.
16.
HealyJ.D.2004. Housing, fuel poverty and health: A pan-European analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate.
17.
HeffnerG.CampbellN.2011. Evaluating the co-benefits of low-income energy-efficiency programmes. Paris: OECD/IEA.
18.
HillsJ.2012. Getting the measure of fuel poverty: Final report of the Fuel Poverty Review. London: DECC.
19.
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2005. Energy policies of IEA countries: Australia 2005 review. Paris: OECD/IEA.
20.
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2011. CO2 emissions from fuel consumption. Paris: OECD/IEA.
21.
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2012. Key world energy statistics. Paris: OECD/IEA.
22.
JoskowP. L.2003. The difficult transition to competitive markets in the U.S. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics/CMI Working Paper, CWPE 0328/CMI.
23.
LiddellC.MorrisC.2010. Fuel poverty and human health: A review of recent evidence. Energy Policy38(6): 2,987-2,997.
24.
LohmannL.2010. Uncertainty markets and carbon markets: Variations on Polanyian themes. New Political Economy15(2): 225-254.
25.
NewberyD.L.2002. Issues and options for restructuring electricity supply industries. University of Cambridge (Mass) and Cambridge-MIT Institute, DAE-CMI Working Paper 0210.
26.
O’SullivanK.C.Howden-ChapmanP.L.Fougere.G.2011. Making the connection: The relationship between fuel poverty, electricity disconnection, and prepayment metering. Energy Policy39(2): 733-741.
27.
ShowalterM.2008. Electricity price trends: Deregulated vs regulated states. Olympia: Power in the Public Interest.
28.
World Bank. 2012. State and trends of the carbon market. Washington: World Bank.
