This paper explores the relationship between gender equality and economic democracy in worker cooperatives in the United States. A specific method for analyzing women’s status in worker cooperatives is proposed. Preliminary findings from a small-scale survey of U.S. worker cooperatives in 2001 are presented, showing that despite the egalitarian nature of cooperatives several gender inequalities persist.
CollomE.2000. Worker control: The bases of women’s support. Economic and Industrial Democracy21: 211-235.
7.
ConnM.1990. No bosses here: Management in worker co-operatives. Journal of Business Ethics9: 373-76.
8.
DentonM.ZeytinoğluI.1993. Perceived participation in decision-making in a university setting: The impact of gender. Industrial and Labor Relations Review46 (2): 320-31.
9.
EspinosaJ.ZimbalistA.1981. Economic democracy. New York: Academic Press.
10.
GabrielP.SchmitzS.2007. Gender differences in occupational distribution among workers. Monthly Labor Review, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June: 19-24.
11.
Grassroots Economic Organizing (GEO) Newsletter. 2000. An economy of hope. Stillwater, PA.
12.
GreenbergE.1986. Workplace democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
GunnC. E.1984. Workers’ self-management in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
HackerS.1989. Pleasure, power, and technology: Some tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
15.
HackerS.ElcorobairutiaC.1987. Women workers in the Mondragon system of industrial cooperatives. Gender and Society1 (4): 358-79.
16.
HoffmanS.AverettS.2005. Women and the economy. Boston, MA: Pearson.
ICA (International Co-operative Alliance). 2000. ICA strategy for promoting gender equality (background info). Accessed May 7, 2009 at www.ica.coop/coop/2000-gender-strategy.pdf.
ILO (International Labor Organization). 1969. Participation of workers in decisions within undertakings. Geneva: Labor-Management Relations Series no. 33. Quoted in Economic democracy, EspinosaJ.ZimbalistA.New York: Academic Press.
21.
ILO (International Labor Organization). 1984. Payment by results. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Organization.
22.
ILO (International Labor Organization). 1995. Gender issues in cooperatives: An ILO - ICA perspective. Accessed May 7, 2009 at www.ica.coop/gender/ica-ilo-manual/
23.
JackallR.LevinH., eds. 1984. Worker cooperatives in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
JacobsJ.2003. Detours on the road to equality: Women, work and higher education. Contexts2 (1): 32-41.
25.
JonesD.IlayperumaK.1998. The determinants of employee participation during fading communism and early transition. In Advances in the economic analysis of participatory and labor-managed firms, vol. 6, ed. BartlettW.UvalicM.Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
26.
KarlssonL.1973. Experiences in employee participation in Sweden: 1969-1972. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Program on Participation and Labor-Managed Systems. Quoted in Economic democracy, EspinosaJ.ZimbalistA.New York: Academic Press.
27.
KasmirS.1996. The myth of Mondragón. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
28.
KlingerS.HartmanC.AndersonS.CavanaghJ.SklarH.2002. Executive excess 2002. Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy. Accessed May 14, 2010 at www.faireconomy.org/files/Executive_Excess_2002.pdf
29.
KrimermanL.March7, 2001. Personal e-mail correspondence.
OertonS.1994. Exploring women workers’ motives for employment in cooperative and collective organizations. Journal of Gender Studies3: 289-97.
41.
OertonS.1996. Beyond hierarchy: Gender, sexuality and the social economy. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
42.
PencavelJ.2001. Worker participation: Lessons from the worker co-ops of the Pacific Northwest. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
43.
SmithJ.2003. Worker co-operatives. BC Institute for Co-operative Studies, University of Victoria. Accessed May 7, 2009, at http://web.uvic.ca/bcics/research/worker/
44.
SudmanS.1976. Applied sampling. New York: Academic Press.
45.
TangW. F.1993. Worker participation in Chinese local industries. American Journal of Political Science37 (3): 920-40.
46.
TheisL.Hammond KetilsonL.1994. Research for action: Women in co-operatives. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: University of Saskatchewan Printing Services.
47.
TolbertP.SternR.1991. Inequality in a company of equals: Participation and control in large law firms. In International handbook of participation in organizations, ed. RussellR.RusV.New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives (UWCC). 2009. Cooperatives in the U.S. economy: Research on the economic impact of cooperatives. Accessed June 5, 2009 at http://reic.uwcc.wisc.edu/issues.
U.S. Federation of Worker Cooperatives. About worker cooperatives. 2006. Confronting internalized oppression and fostering leadership among marginalized groups. Accessed May 7, 2009 at wwww.usworker.coop/conference2006/content
51.
U.S. Federation of Worker Cooperatives. About worker cooperatives. 2008. African-American women in worker cooperatives: Then and now. Accessed May 7, 2009 at www.usworker.coop/node/321
52.
VanekJ.1970. The general theory of labor-managed market economies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.