This article investigates citations metrics as an institutional phenomenon from two perspectives: first it tries to articulate the role of citation metrics within a Gramscian framework; second it compares citation patterns from orthodox and heterodox economic journals to gain insights on the current economic discourse. Complementary to this general question the role of the Review of Radical Political Economics within citation metrics will be discussed.
Adler, R., J. Ewing, and P. Taylor.2008. Citation statistics. Online: http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf [1 April 2009].
2.
Amin, M., and M. Mabe.2000. Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing (October): 1-6.
3.
Cronin, B.2008. Journal citations among heterodox economists 1995-2007: Dynamics of community emergence. On the Horizon16: 226-240.
4.
Dobusch, L., and J. Kapeller.2009a. Why is economics not an evolutionary science? - New answers to Veblen’s old question. Journal of Economic Issues43: 867-898.
5.
Dobusch, L., and J. Kapeller.2009b. Diskutieren und zitieren: Zur paradigmatischen Konstellation aktueller ökonomischer Theorie. Intervention - Journal of Economics6: 145-152.
6.
Dobusch, L., and J. Kapeller.2009c. A guide to paradigmatical self-marginalization - Lessons for post-Keynesian economists. Paper presented at the conference The World Economy in Crisis - The Return of Keynesianism? , Berlin, October 2009.
Kapeller, J.2010. Citation metrics: Serious drawbacks, perverse incentives and strategic options for heterodox economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology (forthcoming).
9.
King, J.E., and P. Kriesler.2008. News from down under. On the Horizon16: 289-292.
10.
Lee, F.S.2008. A case for ranking heterodox journals and departments . On the Horizon16: 241-251.
11.
Lee, F.S.2009a. Challenging the mainstream: Essays on the history of heterodox economics in the twentieth century - The appendix. Online: http://www.heterodoxnews.com/APPENDIX--formatted.pdf [14 May 09].
12.
Lee, F.S.2009b. Informational directory for heterodox economists: Graduate and undergraduate programs, journals, publishers and book series, associations, blogs, and institutes and other Websites. Online: http://www.heterodoxnews.com/directory/heterodox-directory.pdf [20 January 2009].
13.
Marx, K.2004[1845]. The German ideology. International Publishers.
14.
Merton, R.K.1968. The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science159: 56-63.
15.
Reedijk, J., and H.F. Moed.2006. Is the impact of journal impact factors decreasing? Journal of Documentation64: 183-192.
16.
Rossner, M., H. van Epps, and E. Hill.2007. Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology179:1091-1092.
17.
Rossner, M., H. van Epps, and E. Hill.2008. Irreproducible results: A response to Thomson Scientific. The Journal of Experimental Medicine205: 260.
18.
Sterman, J.D., and J. Wittenberg.1999. Path dependency, competition, and succesion in the dynamics of scientific revolution. Organization Science10: 322-341.
19.
Thomson Scientific, ed. 2008a. Preserving the integrity of the journal impact factor: Guidelines from the scientific business of Thomson Reuters. Online: http://forums.thomsonscientific.com/t5/Citation-Impact-Center/Preserving-the-Integrity-of-The-Journal-Impact-Factor-Guidelines/bc-p/1243#C16 [24 March 2009].
20.
Thomson Scientific, ed. 2008b. Thomson Scientific corrects inaccuracies in editorial. Online: http://forums.thomsonscientific.com/t5/Citation-Impact-Center/Thomson-Scientific-Corrects-Inaccuracies-In-Editorial/ba-p/717#A4 [10 November 2009].
