Using Swedish historical national accounts, this paper shows that, up to the 1970s, there has been a secular rise in the national capital/output ratio and a secular fall in the rate of exploitation, which tended to depress the profit rate. In Sweden, the nominal capital/output ratio increased fastest during the transition from primitive to accelerated accumulation in the 19th century. Since the 1970s, these secular trends have been reversed, which is connected to flexible accumulation that slims down the inventory stock to a minimum and destroys old consensus between capital and labor.
Bowles, S.1981. Technical change and the profit rate: A simple proof of the Okishio theorem. Cambridge Journal of Economics5: 183-186.
2.
Burkett, J.2000. Marx’s concept of an economic law of motion. History of Political Economy32 (2): 381-394.
3.
Cámara, S.2007. The dynamics of the profit rate in Spain (1954-2001). Review of Radical Political Economics39: 543-561.
4.
Cullenberg, S.1994. The falling rate of profit: Recasting the Marxian debate . London: Pluto Press.
5.
Erixon, L.1987. Profitability in Swedish manufacturing: Trends and explanations . Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
6.
Goldstein, J.2006. Marxian microfoundations: Contribution or detour? Review of Radical Political Economy38 (4): 42-50.
7.
Hardt, M., and A. Negri.2001. Empire. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
8.
Harvey, D.1989. The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
9.
Jörberg, L.1966. Några tillväxtfaktorer i 1800-talets svenska industriella utveckling. In Kring industrialismens genombrott i Sverige, ed. R. Lundström.Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.
10.
Kaldor, N.1960. Essays on economic stability and growth. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.
11.
Kliman, A.1997. The Okishio theorem: An obituary. Review of Radical Political Economy29 (3): 42-50.
12.
Laibman, D.1982. Technical change, the real wage, and the rate of exploitation: The falling rate of profit reconsidered. Review of Radical Political Economy14 (2): 95-105.
13.
Laibman, D.1996. Technical change, accumulation and the rate of profit revisited. Review of Radical Political Economy28 (2): 33-53.
14.
Lipietz, A.1986. Behind the crisis: The exhaustion of a regime of accumulation. A ‘regulation school’ perspective on some French empirical work . Review of Radical Political Economics18 (1-2): 13-32.
15.
Marx, K.1965. Capital, vol. I. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
16.
—. 1966. Capital, vol. III. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
17.
Moseley, F.1991. The falling rate of profit in the postwar United States economy. London: Macmillan.
Orzech, Z., and S. Groll.1989. Stages in the development of a Marxian concept: The composition of capital. History of Political Economy21 (1): 57-76.
20.
Palmer, R.2001. Historical patterns of globalization: The growth of outward linkages of Swedish longstanding transnational corporations, 1890s-1990s. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
21.
Saad-Filho, A.2002. The value of Marx: Political economy for contemporary capitalism. London: Routledge.
22.
Savran, S., and A. Tonak.1999. Productive and unproductive labor: An attempt at clarification and classification. Capital & Class68: 113-152.
23.
Schön, L.2000. En modern svensk ekonomisk historia: Tillväxt och omvandling under två sekel. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
24.
Sherman, H.1986. Changes in the character of the U.S. business cycle. Review of Radical Political Economics18 (1-2): 190-204.
25.
Shaikh, A., and A. Tonak.1994. Measuring the wealth of nations: The political economy of national accounts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Smith, T.2000. Technology and capital in the age of lean production: A Marxian critique of the "new economy." New York: State University of New York.
27.
Statistics Sweden.1995. Statistiska Meddelanden, N 10 SM 9501, Appendix 1, BNPs användning 1980-94.
28.
System of National Accounts1993. 1993. Brussels, Luxembourg, New York, Paris, and Washington: Inter-Secretariat Working Group on National Accounts.
29.
Tickel, A., and P. Peck.1992. Accumulation, regulation and the geographies of post-Fordism: Missing links in regulationist research. Progress in Human Geography16 (2): 190-218.
30.
Thompson, F.1998. The composition of capital and the rate of profit: A reply to Laibman. Review of Radical Political Economy30 (1): 90-107.
31.
Vikström, P.2002. The big picture: A historical national accounts approach to growth, structural change and income distribution in Sweden 1870-1990. Umeå: Umeå University.
32.
Weibull, J.1993, Sveriges historia. Wiken: Svenska institutet.
