Conceived as Transverse Solidarity, the Cola Quit Plachimada struggle in a rural hamlet in the Indian state of Kerala reveals how the socio-economic sustainability of communities is of as much importance as environmental, cultural, and political justification for a social movement and its success. The implicit theoretical notion is further enriched and elucidated by the ethnographic narration of a plurality of contested issues and struggles at multiple sites of power. The study addresses how a water-based subaltern movement gradually grew into transverse solidarity within the space between civil society and the state/governing institutions, politicizing them and consequently making allies of them, and how the discursive and material practices of structure-authorities and macro-power relations were contested.
Aiyer, A.2007. The allure of the transnational: Notes on some aspects of the political economy of water in India. Cultural Anthropology22 (4): 640-658.
2.
Appadurai, A.2002. Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizons of politics. Public Culture14 (1): 21-47.
3.
Badiou, A.2004. Theoretical writings, trans. and ed. A. Toscano and R. Brassier.London: Continuum.
Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari.1988. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schzophrenia. London: Athlone.
17.
Dirlik, A.2000. Place-based imagination: Globalism and the politics of place. In Places and politics in the age of globalization , ed. A. Dirlik.New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
18.
Dreze, J., and A.K. Sen.1993. Hunger and public action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Escobar, A.1995. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
Escobar, A.2001. Culture sits in places: Reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography20: 139-174.
21.
Ferguson, J.1995. The anti-politics machine. London: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
Ferguson, J., and A. Gupta.2002. Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist29 (4): 981-1002.
23.
Foucault, M.1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings . New York: Pantheon.
24.
Franke, R.W., and B.H. Chasin.1994 [1989]. Kerala: Radical reform as development in an Indian state. Third printing, second ed., with substantial update to the 1994 printing. Oakland, CA: Institute for Food and Development Policy, and New Delhi: Promilla and Co.
25.
Gledhill, J.1994. Power and its disguises: Anthropological perspectives on politics. London: Pluto Press .
26.
Gill, L.2007. ‘Right there with you’: Coca-Cola, labor restructuring and political violence in Colombia, 27 (3): 235-260.
27.
Greenough, P., and A. L. Tsing, eds. 2004. Nature in the global South . New Delhi: Longman.
28.
Guha, R.1989. Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A Third World critique. Environmental Ethics11: 71-83.
29.
Guha, R., and J. Martinez-Alier .1997. Varieties of environmentalism: Essays North and South. London: Earthscan.
30.
Guidry, J., A. Michael, D. Kennedy, and M.N. Zald.2000. Globalization and social movements: Culture, power, and the transnational public sphere. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
31.
Hallward, P.2003. Badiou: A subject to truth. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
32.
Hardt, M., and A. Negri.2004. Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin .
33.
Harvey, D.2000. Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
34.
Heller, P.1999. The labor of development: Workers and the transformation of capitalism in Kerala. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
India Resource Centre, 2004. "Coca-Cola Challenged in UK on Human Rights, Labour and environmental issues" , October 12, www.indiaresource.org.
36.
Jeffrey, R.1992/1993. Politics, women and well-being: How Kerala became ‘a model.’London: Macmillan; New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Second ed., with new introductory chapter, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001.
37.
Kapferer, B.2005. New formations of power, the oligarchic-corporate state, and anthropological ideological discourse. Anthropological Theory5 (3): 285-299.
38.
Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe.1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
39.
Melucci, A.1989. Nomads of the present-Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
40.
Nash, K.2001. The cultural turn in social theory: Towards a theory of cultural politics. Sociology35 (1): 77-92.
Pile, S., and M. Keith, eds. 1997. Geographies of resistance . London: Routledge.
43.
Rammohan, K.T., and K. Ravi Raman .1988. Kerala worker rises against Indian big capital - A report unfinished on rayon workers’ struggle . Economic and Political Weekly, July 2.
44.
Rammohan, K.T., and K. Ravi Raman .1989. Mavoor Rayons accord: Kerala. Government on its knees. Economic and Political Weekly, January 7.
45.
Ravi Raman, K.2004. Muthanga: A spark of hope. Social Analysis48 (1) (Spring): 126-135; and in Kapferer, B., ed. State, sovereignty, war . Oxford: Berghahn .
46.
Ravi Raman, K.2005. Corporate violence, legal nuances and political ecology: The cola war in Plachimada. Economic and Political WeeklyXL (25), June 18.
47.
Ravi Raman, K.2007a. Community-corporate interface: Political anthropological concerns of corporate social responsibility. Social Analysis51 (3) (Winter): 103-120.
48.
Ravi Raman, K.2007b. Plachimada resistance: A postdevelopment social movement metaphor? In Exploring post-development: Theory and practice, problems and perspectives, ed. A. Ziai , 63-180. New York and London : Routledge .
49.
Ravi Raman, K.2009. Asian Development Bank, policy conditionalities and the social democratic governance: Kerala model under pressure?Review of International Political Economy16 (2): 284-308.
50.
Ravi Raman, K., ed. 2010. Development, Democracy and the State: Critiquing Kerala Model of Development. New York and London: Routledge .
51.
Ravi Raman, K and R. D. Lipschutz , eds. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility: Comparative Critiques. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
52.
Routledge, P., A. Cumbers, and C. Nativel.2007. Grassrooting network imaginaries: Relationality, power, and mutual solidarity in global justice networks. Environment and Planning39: 2575-2592.
53.
Scott, J.C.1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
Sivaramakrishnan, K., and A. Agrawal, eds. 2003. Regional modernities: The cultural politics of development in India. CA: Stanford University Press.
55.
Sklair, L.1998. Social movements and global capitalism: The cultures of globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.
56.
Surendranath, C.2000. Mavoor: Decline of a developmental model (in vernacular press, Malayalam). Calicut: Pappyon .
57.
Swyngedouw, E.2004. Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of Power , New York: Oxford University Press .
58.
Tarrow, S.G.1983. Power in Movement: Social movements and contentious politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Thoburn, N.2003. The hobo anomalous: Class, minorities and political invention in the Industrial Workers of the World. Social Movement Studies2 (1): 61-84.
60.
Tarrow, S., McAdam, D., C. and Tilly.2005. The new transnational activism. Cambridge : Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics .
61.
Torfing, J.1999. New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek . Oxford and Massachusetts: Blackwell.
62.
Tomlinson, J.1999. Globalization and culture. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
63.
Vedwan, N.2007. Pesticides in Coca-Cola and Pepsi: Consumerism, brand image, and public interest in a globalizing India. Cultural Anthropology22 (4): 659-684.
64.
Žižek, Slavo.2008. In Defence of lost causes. London and New York: Verso .
