The reform of water policies in Brazil has involved a combination of regulatory norms and economic-incentive instruments. Nonetheless, contrary to its formal objectives, the process has largely failed to prevent widespread environmental impacts and growing spatial and sectoral conflicts. The main reason for such failures is the perverse influence of market rationality, which is particularly evident in the reorganization of the public sector, the quantification of the monetary value of water, and the payment for environmental services.
Abers, R.N., and M.E. Keck.2006. Muddy waters: The political construction of deliberative river basin governance in Brazil. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30 (3): 601-622.
2.
Agyeman, J., and B. Evans.2004. ‘Just sustainability’: The emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain? The Geographical Journal170 (2): 155-164.
3.
Alves, A.C.2008. Saneamento básico: A obscuridade juridica e suas razões. Sanear3: 12-20.
4.
Anuatti-Neto, F., M. Barossi-Filho, A. Carvalho, and R. Macedo.2003. Costs and benefits of privatization: Evidence from Brazil. Washington, DC: IADB.
5.
Associaçăo Nacional dos Serviços Municipais de Saneamento (ASSEMAE).2006. Successful experiences in municipal public water and sanitation services from Brazil. Brasilia: ASSEMAE . http://www.tni.org/detail_pub.phtml?&page=books_brazilwater&menu=05k
6.
Bishop, R.C.1978. Endangered species and uncertainty: The economics of a safe minimum standard. American Journal of Agricultural Economics60: 10-18.
7.
Bowles, S.2004. Microeconomics: Behavior, institutions and evolution . New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
8.
Britto, A., and R.T. Silva.2006. Water management in the cities of Brazil: Conflicts and new opportunities in regulation. In Urban water conflicts: An analysis of the origins and nature of water-related unrest and conflicts in the urban context, 39-51. Paris : IHP/UNESCO.
9.
Bromley, D.W.1991. Environment and economy: Property rights and public policy . Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
10.
Bromley, D.W.2007. Environmental regulations and the problem of sustainability: Moving beyond ‘market failure.’ Ecological Economics63: 676-683.
11.
Bryant, R.L.1998. Power, knowledge and political ecology in the Third World: A review. Progress in Physical Geography22: 79-94.
12.
Burkett, P.2003. Natural capital, ecological economics, and Marxism . International Paper in Political Economy10 (3). University of Leeds.
13.
Burkett, P., and J.B. Foster.2006. Metabolism, energy, and entropy in Marx’s critique of political economy: Beyond the Podolinsky myth. Theory and Society35: 109-156.
14.
Castle, E.N.1999. Natural resources and environmental economics: A retrospective view. Review of AgriculturalEconomics21(2): 288-304.
15.
Castro, J.E.2008. Neoliberal water and sanitation policies as a failed development strategy: Lessons from developing countries. Progress in Development Studies8: 63-83.
16.
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V.1952. Resource conservation: Economics and policies. Berkeley: University of California Press .
17.
Coase, R.H.1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics3: 1-44.
18.
Conca, K.2006. Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institutional building. Cambridge, MA and London : MIT Press.
19.
Coppetec.2006. Plano de recursos hídricos da bacia do Rio Paraíba do Sul. Resende: AGEVAP.
20.
Daly, H.E., and J. Farley.2004. Ecological economics: Principles and applications. Washington, DC: Island Press.
21.
Ditwilier, C.D.1975. Water problems and property rights: An economic perspective . Natural Resources Journal15: 663-680.
22.
Faoro, R.2001. Os donos do poder: Formação histórica do patronato político Brasileiro. 2nd ed. São Paulo: Globo.
23.
Fearnside, P.M.1997. Environmental services as a strategy for sustainable development in rural Amazonia. Ecological Economics20 (1): 53-70.
24.
Féres, J., A. Thomas, A. Reynaud, and R. Serôa da Motta.2005. Demanda por água e custo de controle da poluição hídrica nas indústrias da bacia do Rio Paraíba do Sul. Document no. 1084. IPEA: Rio de Janeiro .
25.
Formiga-Johnsson, R.M., L. Kumler, and M.C. Lemos.2007. The politics of bulk water pricing in Brazil: Lessons from the Paraíba do Sul Basin. Water Policy9: 87-104.
26.
Garrido, R.J.2004. Reflexões sobre a aplicação da cobrança pelo uso da água no Brasil. In Gestão de ágas doces, ed. C. J. S. Machado , 105-133. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência.
27.
GEO Brasil.2007. Recursos hídricos. Brasília : MMA, ANA & PNUMA.
28.
Gowdy, J., and J.D. Erickson.2005. The approach of ecological economics . Cambridge Journal of Economics29: 207-222.
29.
Hall, D., and E. Lobina.2006. Agua, privatización y ciudadania . In La gota de la vida: Hacia una gestión sustentable y democrática del agua, 288-309. Central America, México, and Cuba: Fundación Heinrich Böll.
30.
Hall, D., and E. Lobina.2007. Profitability and the poor: Corporate strategies, innovation and sustainability. Geoforum38: 772-785.
31.
He, J., X. Chen, Y. Shi, and A. Li.2007. Dynamic computable general equilibrium model and sensitivity analysis for shadow price of water resource in China . Water Resources Management21: 1517-1533.
32.
Heinz, I., M. Pulido-Velazquez, J.R. Lund, and J. Andreu.2007. Hydro-economic modeling in river basin management: Implications and applications for the European Water Framework Directive. Water Resources Management21: 1103-1125.
33.
Heller, P.2001. Moving the state: The politics of democratic decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre. Politics & Society29: 131-163.
34.
Hodgson, G.M.2006. What are institutions? Journal of Economic . Issues40 (1): 1-25.
35.
Holland, A.-C.S.2005. The water business: Corporation versus people. London and New York: Zed Books .
36.
Ibge.2004. Atlas de saneamento . Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
37.
Ioris A. A. R. 2007. The headwaters of water problems in Brazil: Commodification and exclusion. Capitalism, Nature Socialism18 (1): 28-50.
38.
Kerr, J., G. Milne, V. Chhotray, P. Baumann, and A.J. James.2007. Managing watershed externalities in India: Theory and practice. Environment Development and Sustainability9: 263-281.
39.
Kosoy, N., M. Martinez-Tuna, R. Muradian, and J. Martinez-Alier .2007. Payments for environmental services in watersheds: Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecological Economics61: 446-455.
40.
Leff, E.1996. Marxism and the environmental question: From the critical theory of production to an environmental rationality for sustainable development . In The greening of .Marxism, ed. T. Benton, 137-156. New York: The Guilford Press.
41.
Lemos, M.C., and A. Agrawal.2006. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources31: 297-325.
42.
Liodakis, G.2000. Environmental implications of international trade and uneven development: Toward a critique of environmental economics. Review of Radical Political Economics32 (1): 40-79.
43.
Liverman, D., and S. Vilas.2006. Neoliberalism and the environment in Latin America. Annual Review of Environment and Resources31: 327-363.
44.
Machado, C.J.S.2006. O mundo da administração pública das águas do Estado do Rio de Janeiro segundo o olhar de um antropólogo . Horizontes Antropológicos25: 171-190.
45.
Mare.1995. Plano diretor da reforma do Estado. Brasília: MARE.
46.
Marshall, A.1966[1890]. Principles of economics. 8th ed. London: Macmillan.
47.
Martinez-Alier, J.2002. Environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
48.
May, P.H.1999. O setor financeiro privado internacional e o meio ambiente: O caso do Brasil. In Meio ambiente, desenvolvimento sustentável e políticas públicas, ed. C. Cavalcanti, 299-313. 2nd ed. São Paulo: Cortez.
49.
Mello, M., 2001. Privatização do setor de saneamento no Brasil: Quatro experiências e muitas lições. Document no. 447. Rio de Janeiro : Economics Department, PUC.
50.
Middleton, N., and P. O’Keefe .2001. Redefining sustainable development . London: Pluto Press .
51.
Mill, J.S.1965 [1871]. Principles of political economy . 7th ed. Collected works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
52.
Mitchell, B.2005. Integrated water resources management, institutional arrangements, and land-use planning. Environment and Planning A37: 1335-1352.
53.
MMA.2006. Plano nacional de recursos hídricos. Brasília: Ministry of the Environment.
54.
Mollo, M.L.R., and A. Saad-Filho.2006. Neoliberal economic policies in Brazil (1994-2005): Cardoso, Lula and the need for a democratic alternative. New Political Economy11 (1): 99-123.
55.
Mulreany, J.P., S. Calikoglu, S. Ruiz, and J.W. Sapsin.2006. Water privatization and public health in Latin America. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica19 (1): 23-32.
56.
Newell, P.2007. Trade and environmental justice in Latin America . New Political Economy12 (2): 237-259.
57.
Oliveira Filho, A.2006. Institucionalização e desafios da política nacional de saneamento: Um balanço. Proposta110: 12-23.
58.
Paavola, J.2007. Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization . Ecological Economics63: 93-103.
59.
Page, B.2005. Paying for water and the geography of commodities . Trans. Inst. British Geographers30: 293-306.
60.
Pigou, A.C.1938[1920]. The economics of welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan .
61.
Prudham, S.2004. Poisoning the well: Neoliberalism and the contamination of municipal water in Walkerton, Ontario. Geoforum35: 343-359.
62.
Ribeiro, E.M., F.M. Galizoni, J.S. Calixto, T.P. Assis, E.B. Ayres, and L.H. Silvestre.2005. Gestão, uso e conservação de recursos naturais em comunidades rurais do Alto Jequetinhonha. Estudos Urbanos e Regionais7 (2): 77-99.
63.
Ricardo, D.1962[1817]. On the principles of political economy and taxation. The works and correspondence of David Ricardo. London: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Robertson, M.2007. Discovering price in all the wrong places: The work of commodity definition and price under neoliberal environmental policy . Antipode39 (3): 500-526.
65.
Rogers, P., R. Silva, and R. Bhatia.2002. Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy4: 1-17.
66.
Saleth, R.M., and A. Dinar.2005. Water institutional reforms: Theory and practice. Water Policy7: 1-19.
67.
Seidl, A., and A.S. Moraes.2000. Global valuation of ecosystem services: Application to the Pantanal da Nhecolandia, Brazil. Ecological Economics33: 1-6.
68.
Serôa da Motta, R.1998. Manual para valoração econômica de recursos ambientais. Brasília: MMA.
69.
Silvano, R.A.M., S. Udvardy, M. Ceroni, and J. Farley.2005. An ecological integrity assessment of a Brazilian Atlantic forest watershed based on surveys of stream health and local farmers’ perceptions: Implications for management. Ecological Economics53: 369-385.
70.
Smith, N.2007. Nature as accumulation strategy. In Socialist register: Coming to terms with nature, ed. L. Panitch and C. Leys, 16-36. London : Merlin Press.
71.
Sneddon, C.2007. Nature’s materiality and the circuitous paths of accumulation: Dispossession of freshwater fisheries in Cambodia. Antipode39 (1): 167-193.
72.
Söderbaum, P.2000. Ecological economics. London : Earthscan.
73.
Solanes, M., and A. Jouravlev.2006. Water governance for development and sustainability. Serie Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura, Document no. 111. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL.
74.
Spash, C.L.1999. The development of environmental thinking in economics . Environmental Values8: 413-435.
75.
Swaney, J.A.1987. Elements of a neoinstitutional environmental economics . Journal of Economic Issues21 (4): 1739-1779.
76.
Swyngedouw, E.2004. Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of power. Oxford Geographical and Environmental Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77.
Swyngedouw, E.2005. Dispossessing H2O: The contested terrain of water privatization . Capitalism, Nature Socialism16 (1): 81-98.
78.
Tolmasquim, M.T., R. Serôa da Motta, E. L. La Rovere, M.M.L. Barata, and A.G. Monteiro.2001. Environmental valuation for long-term strategic planning: The case of the Brazilian power sector. Ecological Economics37: 39-51.
79.
Unep.2004. The use of economic instruments in environmental policy: Opportunities and challenges. Geneva: UNEP.
80.
Valêncio, N.F.L.S., and R.C. Martins.2004. Novas institucionalidades na gestão de águas e poder local: Os limites territoriais da democracia decisória . Interações5 (8): 55-70.
81.
Van Houtven, G., J. Powers, and S.K. Pattanayak .2007. Valuing water quality improvements in the United States using meta-analysis: Is the glass half-full or half-empty for national policy analysis? Resource and Energy Economics29: 206-228.
82.
Vosti, S.A., E.M. Braz, C.L. Carpentier, M.V.N. d’Oliveira, and J. Witcover.2003. Rights to forest products, deforestation and smallholder income: Evidence from the western Brazilian Amazon. World Development31 (11): 1889-1901.
83.
Waap.2006. The second UN world water development report: ‘Water, a shared responsibility.’ World Water Assessment Programme. Paris: UNESCO and New York : Berghahn Books.
84.
Wallerstein, I.2003. The ecology and the economy: What is rational? In World system history and global environmental change, Conference Keynote, Lund, Sweden, 19-22 September 2003.
85.
Ward, F.A.2007. Decision support for water policy: A review of economic concepts and tools. Water Policy9: 1-31.
86.
World Bank.1993. Water resources management: A World Bank policy paper. Washington, DC: IBRD.
87.
Wunder, S.2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology21 (1): 48-58.
88.
Young, C.E.F.2005. Instrumentos econômicos para o desenvolvimento sustentável: O caso Brasileiro. In As instituições financeiras públicas e o meio ambiente no Brasil e na América Latina, ed. C. Parreira and H. Alimonda, 219-248. Brasília: FLACSO.
