This paper assesses the ideological arguments that sustain the belief that the private sector is more efficient than the public, which persist despite ambiguous empirical evidence. It argues that the privatization agenda rests on normative assumptions about “economic efficiency” that fail to adequately address the social goals of water and sanitation provision. The debate on “efficiency” should therefore be re-centered to consider “social efficiency” and the negative effect that privatization has on citizenship rights.
Bakan, J.2004. The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. Toronto: Viking Canada .
2.
Bakker, K.2001. Paying for water: Water pricing and equity in England and Wales. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers26: 143-164.
3.
Bakker, K.2003. Archipelagos and networks: Urbanization and water privatization in the South. Geographical Journal169: 328-341.
4.
Balanyá, B., B. Brennan, O. Hoedeman, S. Kishimoto, and P. Terhorst.2005. Reclaiming public water: Achievements, struggles, and visions from around the world. Porto Alegre , Brazil: Transnational Institute and Corporate Europe Observatory.
5.
Bayliss, K.2001. The World Bank and privatisation: A flawed development tool. Global Focus13: 95-103.
6.
Bayliss, K., and B. Fine.2007. Privatization and alternative public sector reform in sub-Saharan Africa: Delivering on electricity and water. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
Bond, P.2002a. An answer to marketization: Decommodification and the assertion of rights to essential services. Multinational-Monitor (electronic version)23.
8.
Bond, P.2002b. Unsustainable South Africa: Environment, development and social protest. London: Merlin Press.
9.
Bond, P. n.d. Reclaiming water pricing for participatory public services. Water justice. 2008.
10.
Bourdieu, P.2002. Against the policy of depoliticization. Studies in Political Economy: 31-41.
11.
Budds, J., and G. McGranahan.2003. Are the debates on water privatization missing the point? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Environment and Urbanization15: 87-113.
12.
Burnham, P.1999. The politics of economic management in the 1990s . New Political Economy4: 37-54.
13.
Carty, B.2002. Interview with Menahem Libhaber, Principal Water and Sanitary Engineer for the World Bank. In Water for profit: How multinationals are taking control of a public resource. Ottawa, Canada.
14.
Castro, J.E.2004.Urban water and the politics of citizenship: The case of the Mexico City Metropolitan Area during the 1980s and 1990s. Environment and Planning A36: 327-346.
15.
Castro, J.E.2007. Poverty and citizenship: Sociological perspectives on water services and public-private participation. Geoforum38: 756-771.
16.
Chng, N.R.2008. Privatization and citizenship: Local politics of water in the Philippines. Development51: 42-48.
17.
Chossudovsky, M.2003. The globalization of poverty and the new world order. Shanty Bay, Ont.: Global Outlook.
18.
Clarke, G.R.G., C. Menard, and A.M. Zuluaga.2002. Measuring the welfare effects of reform: Urban water supply in Guinea. World Development30: 1517-1537.
19.
Clarke, S.1987. Capitalist crisis and the rise of monetarism. In Socialist Register 1987, ed. R. Miliband, L. Panitch, and J. Saville, 393-427. London: Merlin.
20.
Clarke, S.1988. Keynesianism, monetarism and the crisis of the state. Aldeshot: Edward Elgar .
21.
Clarke, S.1991. The state debate. In The state debate , ed. S. Clarke, 1-69. London : Macmillan.
22.
Crespo Flores, C.2004. "El agua y el gas son nuestros." Siete tesis sobre el poder biopolítico, el estado racista y los movimientos sociales en Bolivia. Decursos6: 38-62.
23.
Crespo Flores, C.2006. Soberanía y autogestión en la terminación del contrato con AISA y el futuro del servicio. In bolpress.
24.
Davis, J.2005. Private-sector participation in the water and sanitation sector. Annual Review of Environment and Resources30: 145-183.
25.
Davis, M.2006. The planet of slums. London and New York: Verso Press .
26.
Economist.2006. Clean water is a right. But it also needs to have a price. In Economist , vol. 381: 67-68.
27.
Estache, A., and M.A. Rossi.2002. How different is the efficiency of public and private water companies in Asia? World Bank Economic Review16: 139-148.
28.
Fauconnier, I.T.1999. The privatization of residential water supply and sanitation services: Social equity issues in the California and international contexts . Berkeley Planning Journal13: 37-73.
29.
Fine, B.1999. The developmental state is dead - long live social capital . Development and Change30: 1-19.
30.
Finger, M., and J. Allouche.2002. Water privatisation: Transnational corporations and the re-regulation of the water industry. London and New York: Spon Press.
31.
Gassner, K., A. Popov, and N. Pushak.2007. An empirical assessment of private participation in electricity and water distribution in developing and transition economies . Washington, DC: World Bank.
32.
Gilbert, A.1990. The provision of public services and the debt crisis in Latin America: The case of Bogota. Economic Geography66: 349-361.
33.
Gómez-Ibáñez, J., D. Lorrain, and M. Osius.2004. The future of private infrastructure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Guasch, J.L., and P.T. Spiller.1999. Managing the regulatory process: Design, concepts, issues, and the Latin America and Caribbean story. Washington, DC: World Bank.
35.
Hall, D.1999. Privatisation, multinationals and corruption. Development in Practice9: 539-556.
36.
Hall, D.2001. Water in public hands. London : Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), University of Greenwich.
37.
Hall, D.2004. Water finance - A discussion note. London, UK: Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), University of Greenwich.
38.
Hall, D.2005. Electricity privatisation and restructuring in Latin America and the impact on workers. London: Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), University of Greenwich.
39.
Hall, D., and E. Lobina.2006. Pipe dreams: The failure of the private sector to invest in water services in developing countries. London: Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), University of Greenwich and the World Development Movement.
40.
Hall, D., and E. Lobina.2007. Profitability and the poor: Corporate strategies, innovation and sustainability. Geoforum38:772-785.
41.
ILO.2004. A fair globalization: Creating opportunities for all. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Organization.
42.
Komives, K.2001. Designing pro-poor water and sewer concessions: Early lessons from Bolivia. Water Policy3: 61-79.
43.
Laurie, N., and C. Crespo.2007. Deconstructing the best case scenario: Lessons from water politics in La Paz-El Alto, Bolivia. Geoforum38: 841-854.
44.
Lefeber, L., and T. Vietorisz.2007a. The meaning of social efficiency . Review of Political Economy19: 139-164.
45.
Lobina, E., and D. Hall.2003. Problems with private water concessions: A review of experience. London: Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), University of Greenwich.
46.
Loftus, A.J.2006. Reification and the dictatorship of the water meter . Antipode38: 1023-45.
47.
Loftus, A.J., and D.A. McDonald.2001. Of liquid dreams: A political ecology of water privatization in Buenos Aires. Environment and Urbanization13: 179-199.
48.
Maltz, H.2005. Porto Alegre’s water: Public and for all . In Reclaiming public water: Achievements, struggles and visions from around the world, ed. B. Balanyá , O. Hoedeman, S. Kishimoto , and P. Terhorst, 29-36. Porto Alegre: TNI Publications.
49.
Marshall, T.H.1992. Citizenship and social class. London : Pluto Press.
50.
McClusky, M.T.2003. Efficiency and social citizenship: Challenging the neoliberal attack on the welfare state. Indiana Law Journal78: 783-876.
51.
McDonald, D.A.2008. World city syndrome: Neoliberalism and inequality in Cape Town. New York: Routledge .
52.
McDonald, D.A., and G. Ruiters.2005. The age of commodity: Water privatization in Southern Africa. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
53.
Mehta, L., and O. Mirosa Canel .2004. Financing water for all: Behind the border policy convergence in water management. Sussex, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
54.
Nickson, A., and R. Franceys.2003. Tapping the market: The challenge of institutional reform in the urban water sector. Houndmills , Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
55.
Nickson, A., and C. Vargas.2002. The limitations of water regulation: The failure of the Cochabamba concession in Bolivia. Bulletin of Latin American Research21: 99-120.
56.
Noll, R.2002. The economics of urban water systems. In Thirsting for efficiency, ed. M. Shirley43-63. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
57.
Olivera, O., and T. Lewis.2004. ¡Cochabamba!: Water war in Bolivia . Cambridge, MA: South End Press .
58.
Oxhorn, P.1998. The social foundations of Latin America’s recurrent populism: Problems of popular sector class formation and collective action . Journal of Historical Sociology11: 212-246.
59.
Psiru.2002. Water and the multinational companies. London: Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), University of Greenwich.
60.
Rees, J.A.1998. Regulation and private participation in the water and sanitation sector. Natural Resources Forum22: 95-105.
61.
Robbins, P.T.2003. Transnational corporations and the discourse of water privatization. Journal of International Development15: 1073-1082.
62.
Shirley, M.2002. Thirsting for efficiency: Experiences in reforming urban water systems. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Press.
63.
Sjölander Holland, A.-C.2005. The water business - Corporations versus people . London: Zed Books.
64.
Spronk, S.2007a. The politics of water privatization in the Third World . Review of Radical Political Economics39: 126-131.
65.
Spronk, S.2007b. Roots of resistance to urban water privatization in Bolivia: The new working class, the crisis of neoliberalism, and public services. International Labor and Working-Class History : 8-28.
66.
Swyngedouw, E.2004. Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of power . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
67.
Taylor, M.2004. Responding to neoliberalism in crisis: Discipline and empowerment in the World Bank’s new development agenda. Research in Political Economy21: 3-30.
68.
Tendler, J.1997. Good government in the tropics. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
Trujillo, L., and A. Estache.2005. Infrastructure performance and reform in developing and transition economies: Evidence from a survey of productivity measures. Washington, DC: World Bank.
70.
Tverdek, E.2004. The efficiency imperative: Five questions. Science & Society68: 447-474.
71.
Un-Habitat.2003. Water and sanitation in the world’s cities: Local action for global goals. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications.
72.
Undp.2006. Human development report 2006: Water and human development. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: United Nations Development Program, Palgrave Macmillan.
73.
Warner, M., and A. Hefetz.2002. The uneven distribution of market solutions for public goods. Journal of Urban Affairs24: 445-459.
74.
Winpenny, J.2003. Financing water for all. Report of the World Panel on Financing Water Infrastructure. Marseille, France: World Water Council, Third World Water Forum, and Global Water Partnership.
World Bank.1993. Water resources management. Policy Paper. World Bank, Washington, DC.
77.
World Bank.1994. World development report 1994: Infrastructure for development. Oxford and New York: Published for the World Bank [by] Oxford University Press.
78.
World Bank.2004. Making services work for the poor: World development report 2004. Washington, DC: World Bank.
79.
World Health Organization.2000. Global water supply and sanitation assessment: 2000 report. Geneva: World Health Organization.
80.
Wu, X., and N.A. Malaluan.2008. A tale of two concessionaires: A natural experiment of water privatisation in metro Manila. Urban Studies45: 207-229.
