Today most economists are critical of the antisweatshop movement. But that was not always the case. At times even the leaders of the economics establishment condemned sweatshop labor or its equivalent and lent their support to social movements intended to eradicate it. My paper traces the change in consciousness about sweatshops and antisweatshop movements among economists by examining what Smith, Marx, and earlier neoclassical economists actually wrote about sweatshop-like conditions and antisweatshop movements.
Achbar, M., J. Abbott, and J. Bakan. Released2005. The corporation. Produced by Big Picture Media Corporation. See: http://www.thecorporation.com/index.cfm .
2.
Block, W.2000. Protest! (For no good reason). The Free Market: The Mises Institute Monthly18 (5) (May). Available: https://mises.org/freemarket_detail.aspx?control=313 .
3.
Engels, F.1987. The condition of the working class in England. New York: Penguin Classics.
4.
Freidman, M.2002. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
5.
Henderson, D.R.1997. The case for sweatshops. The Weekly Standard , February 7. Available: http://www.hoover.stanford.edu/pubaffairs/we/current/Henderson_200.html .
6.
Henry, J.F.2008. The ideology of the laissez faire program. Journal of Economic Issues (March).
7.
Jevons, W.S. [ 1882]1968. The state in relation to labour , 4th ed. New York: August M. Kelley.
8.
Jevons, W.S.1970. The theory of political economy, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Penguin.
9.
Marx, K.1967. Capital: A critique of political economy. In vol. I, The process of capitalist production, ed. F. Engels.New York: International Publishers.
10.
McIntyre, R., and Y. Ramstad.2004. Not only Nike’s doing it: ‘Sweating’ and the contemporary labor market. In The institutional tradition in labor economics, ed. D. Champlin and J. Knoedler, 297-316. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
11.
Meyerson, A.R.1997. In principle, a case for more "sweatshops."New York Times, June 22: sec. 4, p. 5.
12.
Miller, J.2003. Why economists are wrong about sweatshops and the antisweatshop movement. Challenge46 (1) (Jan/Feb): 93-122.
13.
Miller, J., and M.D. Yates.2005. Tribute to David Houston. MRzine, September 1. Available: http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/houston010905.html .
14.
Pollin, R., J. Burns, and J. Heintz.2004. Global apparel production and sweatshop labor: Can raising retail prices finance living wages? Cambridge Journal of Economics28 (2): 153-171.
15.
Power, M.1999. Parasitic-industries analysis and arguments for a living wage for women in the early twentieth-century United States. Feminist Economics5 (1): 61-78.
16.
Roberts, D., and P. Engardio.2006. Secrets, lies, and sweatshops. Business Week, November 27.
17.
Smith, A. [ 1759]1790. Theory of moral sentiments, sixth ed. London: A. Millar. Available: http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smMSCover.html .
18.
Smith, A. [ 1776]1904. An inquiry into the nature and the causes of the wealth of nations, fifth ed. London: Methuen and Co., Ltd. Available: http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN.html .
19.
Stein, H.1994. Adam Smith did not wear a Smith necktie. Wall Street Journal, April 6.
20.
Stein, L., ed. 1977. Out of the sweatshop. New York: Quadrangle .
21.
Scholars Against Sweatshop Labor (SASL). 2001. October (www.umass.edu/periIsasl/).
22.
Spath, S.2002 . The virtues of sweatshops. The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty52 (3) (March), published by the Foundation for Economic Education. Available: www.fee.org/Publications/the-Freeman/article.asp?aid=4055
