The Bush Business Cycle Profit Rate: Support in a Theoretical Debate and Implications for the Future

Abstract

This paper looks at the most recent aggregate profit rate data for the United States. It then makes five arguments. First, the new data reinforce the rejection of “neoliberalism as successful capitalist restructuring that could possibly restore or surpass the pre 1970s rate of profit.” Second, when the new data are viewed together with the rest of the post-WWII data, it reinforces the appearance of the fall in the rate of profit as a one-step fall between an earlier and a later period. Third, this result argues against understanding the fall in the rate of profit in terms of an increasing organic composition of capital. Fourth, the one-step fall understanding is consistent with understanding profit rate dynamics in terms of the change of economic regimes between the “Keynesian compromise” period and the neoliberal period. These first four results are all consistent with, though certainly not broad enough to claim to be a proof of all of, the recently reformulated social structures of accumulation theory by Kotz and Wolfson. Finally, when the new data are considered together with several now widely held general beliefs about the near-term performance of the U.S. economy, this paper makes arguments about some likely characteristics of the behavior of the aggregate profit rate over the next business cycle.

Keywords

rate of profit business cycle Marxian crisis theory social structure of accumulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ash, M. , et al. 2009. A progressive program for economic recovery and financial reconstruction. Available as of January 15, 2009, at www.peri.umass.edu .

Baker, D. 1996 Trends in corporate profitability: Getting more for less? Economic Policy Institute, February.

Bakir, E. 2006. The post WWII nonfinancial corporate rate of profit in the US: Cycles, trends, and the effects of financialization. Ph.D. thesis , University of Utah.

Bakir, E. , and A. Campbell. 2006. The effect of neoliberalism on the fall in the rate of profit in business cycles. Review of Radical Political Economics 38 (3): 365-73.

Brenner, R. 2002. The boom and the bubble. London : Verso.

Dumenil, G. , M. Glick , and J. Rangel. 1987. The rate of profit in the United States . Cambridge Journal of Economics 11 (4): 331-359.

Dumenil, G. , and D. Levy. 2002a. The field of capital mobility and the gravitation of profit rates (USA 1948-2000). Review of Radical Political Economics 34 (4): 417-36.

---. 2002b. The profit rate: Where and how much did it fall? Did it recover? (USA 1948-2000). Review of Radical Political Economics 34 (4): 437-61.

______. 2004. Capital resurgent. Cambridge: Harvard.

10.

Ducca, J. 1997. Has long-run profitability risen in the 1990s? Economic Review, Federal Reserve of Dallas, 4th quarter.

11.

Goldstein, J. 1996. The empirical relevance of the cyclical profit squeeze: A reassertion. Review of Radical Political Economics 28 (4): 55-92.

12.

---. 1999. The simple analytics and empirics of the cyclical profit squeeze and cyclical underconsumption theories: Cleaning the air. Review of Radical Political Economics 31 (2): 74-88.

13.

Glyn, A. 2006. Capitalism unleashed. Oxford : Oxford.

14.

Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford.

15.

Henley, A. 1987. Labour’s shares and profitability crisis in the US: Recent experience and post-war trends. Cambridge Journal of Economics 11 (4): 315-30.

16.

Kotz, D. 2003. Neoliberalism and the SSA theory of long-run capital accumulation . Review of Radical Political Economics 35 (3): 263-70.

17.

Michl, T. 1988. The two-stage decline in U.S. nonfinancial corporate profitability, 1948-1986. Review of Radical Political Economics 20 (4): 1-22.

18.

Moseley, F. 1988. The Marxian economic variables and the postwar U.S. economy: A critique of Wolff’s estimates. American Economic Review 78 (1).

19.

Nordhaus, W. 1974. The falling share of profits. Brookings Papers 1: 169-208.

20.

Weisskopf, T.E. 1978. Marxist perspectives on cyclical crises. In U.S. capitalism in crisis, ed. Union for Radical Political Economics , 241-60. New York: Union for Radical Political Economics.

21.

---. 1979. Marxian crisis theory and the rate of profit in the postwar U.S. economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics 3 (4): 341-78.

22.

Wolff, E.N. 1986. The productivity slowdown and the fall in the U.S. rate of profit, 1947-76. Review of Radical Political Economy 18 (1/2): 87-109.

23.

---. 2003. What’s behind the rise in profitability in the US in the 1980s and 1990s? Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (4): 479-99.

24.

Wolfson, M. , and D. Kotz. Forthcoming. A re-conceptualization of SSA theory. In Understanding contemporary capitalism: Social structure of accumulation theory for the twenty-first century, ed. T. McDonough , D. Kotz , and M. Reich. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.