This paper focuses on the theoretical status of the fundamental Marxian theorem in various interpretations of Marxian value theory, particularly with regard to the logical consistency rather than the analytical implication. It will be shown that each interpretation proves the fundamental Marxian theorem in its own way, and therefore the proof of the theorem is not a decidability criterion for the correct interpretation of Marxian value theory.
Bowles, S., and H. Gintis.1981. Structure and practice in the labor theory of value. Review of Radical Political Economics12 (4): 1-26.
2.
Duménil, G.1980. De la valeur aux prix de production. Paris: Economica.
3.
Duménil, G.1984. The so-called "transformation problem" revisited: A brief comment. Journal of Economic Theory33 (2): 340-48.
4.
Duménil, G., and D.K. Foley.2008. The Marxian transformation problem. In The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, ed. S. N. Durlauf and L. B. Blume.Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
Duménil, G., and C. Roy.1982. Une approche fonctionelle du théorème Marxien fondamental d'Okishio Morishima. Cahiers d'économie politique7: 129-39.
6.
Foley, D.K.1982. The value of money, the value of labor power, and the Marxian transformation problem. Review of Radical Political Economics14 (2): 37-49.
7.
Foley, D.K.2000. Recent developments in the labor theory of value. Review of Radical Political Economics32 (1): 1-39.
8.
Foley, D.2005. Marx's theory of money in historical perspective. In Marx's theory of money, ed. F. Moseley.Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
Kliman, A.2001. Simultaneous valuation vs. the exploitation theory of profit. Capital and Class (73): 97-112.
10.
Kliman, A.2007. Reclaiming Marx's capital: A refutation of the myth of inconsistency. Lexington Books.
11.
Kliman, A., and A. Freeman.2006. Replicating Marx: A reply to Mohun. Capital and Class (88): 117-126.
12.
Kliman, A., and A. Freeman.2008. Simultaneous valuation versus the exploitation theory of profit: A summing up. Capital and Class (94): 107-18.
13.
Kliman, A., and T. McGlone.1999. A temporal single-system interpretation of Marx's value theory. Review of Political Economy11 (1): 33-59.
14.
Lee, C.-O.1993. Marx's labour theory of value revisited. Cambridge Journal of Economics17 (4): 463-78.
15.
Lipietz, A.1982. The so-called transformation problem revisited. Journal of Economic Theory26 (1): 59-88.
16.
Mohun, S.2003. On the TSSI and the exploitation theory of profit. Capital and Class (81): 85-102.
17.
Mohun, S.2004. The labour theory of value as foundations for empirical investigations. Metroeconomica55 (1): 65-95.
18.
Mohun, S., and R. Veneziani.2007. The incoherence of the TSSI: A reply to Kliman and Freeman. Capital and Class (92): 139-45.
19.
Morishima, M.1973. Marx's economics. Cambridge University Press.
20.
Okishio, N.1963. A mathematical note on Marxian theorems. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv91 (2). In Okishio, N. 1993.
21.
Okishio, N.1977. Marxian economics: The theory of value and price (in Japanese) . Chikuma Shobo.
22.
Okishio, N.1993. Nobuo Okishio-Essays on political economy: Collected papers . Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang .
23.
Okishio, N., T. Nakatani, and M. Kitano.1978. Three topics on Marxian fundamental theorem. Kobe University Economic Review (24). In Okishio, N. 1993.
24.
Roemer, J.E.1981. Analytical foundations of Marxian economic theory. Cambridge University Press.
25.
Saad-Filho, A.2002. The value of Marx. Routledge.
26.
Screpanti, E.2003. Value and exploitation: A counterfactual approach. Review of Political Economy15 (2): 155-71.
27.
Stamatis, G.1998-9. On the "new solution." International Journal of Political Economy28 (4): 23-46.
28.
Wolff, R., B. Roberts, and A. Callari.1982. Marx's (not Ricardo's) "transformation problem": A radical reconceptualization. History of Political Economy14 (4): 564-82.
