The article considers the barriers to closer cooperation between progressive economists and progressive social change movements. The author provides some examples of successful cooperation, but suggests that these are the exception rather than the norm. The article makes five concrete suggestions for each side that would help to strengthen the relationships between them, and engage progressive economists more fully in social change campaigns.
Akram-Lodhi, H.,R. Chernomas , and A. Sepehri, eds. 2005. Globalization, neo-conservative policies, and democratic alternatives: Essays in honour of John Loxley. Winnipeg : Arbeiter Ring.
2.
Baines, D.2004. Pro-market, non-market: The dual nature of organizational change in social services delivery. Critical Social Policy24 (1): 5-29.
3.
Bakker, I.2002. Fiscal policy, accountability and voice: The example of gender responsive budgeting. In United Nations human development report 2002. New York: UNDP.
4.
Lewchuk, W., et al. 2004. Patterns of control and the erosion of labor standards: Towards an international study of the quality of working life in the automobile industry (Canada, Japan, and the UK). In Work and employment relations in the automobile industry, ed. E. Charron and P. Stewart.Basingstoke: Palgrave.
5.
Stanford, J.,L. Taylor, and E. Houston, eds. 2000. Power, employment and accumulation: Social structures in economic theory and practice. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe .
