The article considers the adjustment toward long-run equilibrium within the Duménil and Lévy macro model, with modifications. Findings show that long-run convergence to fully adjusted positions with normal utilization is not achieved when a more realistic reaction function is proposed. Classical equilibrium occurs when a vertical Phillips curve is substituted, but the model is isomorphic to the “new consensus” model and to features of “new” endogenous growth theory.
Barnes, M.L., and G.P. Olivei.2003. Inside and outside bounds: Estimates of the Phillips curve. New England Economic Review: 3—18.
2.
Deprez, J., and P.D. Dalendina.1994. The monetary determinants of (in)stability: Some contrasts of Duménil/Lévy and the Post-Keynesians. Review of Radical Political Economics26 (3): 66—75.
3.
Duménil G., and D. Lévy.1993. The economics of the profit rate. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
4.
———. 1994. Being Keynesian in the short term and classical in the long term: The traverse to classical long-term equilibrium. Preliminary draft, CEPREMAP, April.
5.
———. 1995. A post-Keynesian long-term equilibrium with equalized profit rates? A rejoinder to Amitava Dutt's synthesis. Review of Radical Political Economics27 (2): 135—41.
6.
———. 1997. Being Keynesian in the short term and classical in the long term: The traverse to classical long-term equilibrium. CEPREMAP, working paper 9702.
7.
———. 1999. Being Keynesian in the short term and classical in the long term: The traverse to classical long-term equilibrium. The Manchester School67 (6): 684—716.
8.
Dutt, A.K.1997. Equilibrium, path dependence and hysteresis in post-Keynesian models. In Markets, unemployment and economic policy: Essays in honour of Geo f Harcour, vol. 2, ed. P. Arestis, G. Palma, and M. Sawyer, 238—53. London : Routledge.
9.
———. 2003. New growth theory, effective demand, and post-Keynesian dynamics. In Old and new growth theories: An assessment, ed. N. Salvadori, 67—100. Cheltenham , UK: Edward Elgar.
10.
———. 2006. Aggregate demand, aggregate supply and economic growth . International Journal of Applied Economics, 20 (3) (July): 319—36.
11.
Eisner R.1996. The retreat from full employment. In Employment, economic growth and the tyranny of the market: Essays in honour of Paul Davidson , vol. 2, ed. P. Arestis, 106—130. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
12.
Filardo, A.J.1998. New evidence on the output cost of fighting inflation. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas CityQuarterly Review83 (3): 33—61.
13.
Flaschel, P., G. Kauermann, and W. Semmler.2005. Testing wage and price Phillips curves for the United States. Working paper, Comparative Empirical Macroeconomics (CEM), New School University.
14.
Fontana, G. and A. Palacio-Vera .2007. Are long-run price stability and short-run output stabilization all that monetary policy can aim for?Metronomica, 58 (2) (May): 269—98.
15.
Freedman, C., G.C. Harcourt, and P. Kriesler.2004. Has the long-run Phillips curve turned horizontal? In Growth, distribution and e fective demand: Alternatives to economic orthodoxy, ed. G. Argyrous, M. Forstater, and G. Mongiovi , 144—62. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
16.
Fuller, D., and D. Geide-Stevenson .2003. Consensus among economists: Revisited. Journal of Economic Education34 (4): 369—87.
17.
Godley, W.1983. Keynes and the management of real national income and expenditure. In Keynes and the modern world, ed. D. Worswick and J. Trevithick, 135—77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Hein, E.2002. Monetary policy and wage bargaining in the EMU: Restrictive ECB policies, high unemployment, nominal wage restraint and inflation above the target. Banca del LavoroQuarterly Review222: 299—337.
19.
Humphrey, T.M.1990. Fisherian and Wicksellian price-stabilization models in the history of economic thought. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Review76 (3): 3—12.
20.
Kriesler, P., and M. Lavoie.2007. The new consensus on monetary policy and its post-Keynesian critique. Review of Political Economy19 (3) (July): 387—404.
21.
Lavoie M.1996. Traverse, hysteresis and normal rates of capacity utilization in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution. Review of Radical Political Economics28 (4) (December): 113—147.
22.
———. 2004. The new consensus on monetary policy seen from a post-Keynesian perspective. In Central banking in the modern world: Alternative perspectives, ed. M. Lavoie and M. Seccareccia, 15—34. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
23.
Lavoie, M., G. Rodríguez, and M. Seccareccia.2004. Similitudes and discrepancies in post-Keynesian and Marxist theories of investment: A theoretical and empirical investigation . International Review of Applied Economics18 (2): 127—50.
24.
Marglin, S.A.1984. Growth, distribution and inflation: A centennial synthesis . Cambridge Journal of Economics8: 115—144.
25.
McDonald, L.M.1995. Models of the range of equilibria. In The natural rate of unemployment: Reflections on 25 years of the hypothesis , ed. R. Cross, 101—52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Nell, E.1985. Jean Baptiste Marglin: A comment on “growth, distribution and inflation.”Cambridge Journal of Economics9 (2): 173—178.
27.
Palacio-Vera, A.2005. The “modern” view of macroeconomics: Some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics29 (5): 747—67.
28.
Rebelo, S.1991. Long-run policy analysis and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy99: 500—21.
29.
Romer, D.2000. Keynesian macroeconomics without the LM curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives14 (2): 149—69.
30.
Setterfield, M.2004. Central banking, stability and macroeconomic outcomes: A comparison of new consensus and post-Keynesian monetary macroeconomics. In Central banking in the modern world: Alternative perspectives, ed. M. Lavoie and M. Seccareccia, 35—56. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
31.
———. 2005. Central bank behavior and the stability of macroeconomic equilibrium: A critical examination of the new consensus. In The new monetary policy: Implications and relevance, ed. P. Arestis, M. Baddeley, and J. S. L. McCombie, 23—47. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
32.
Shaikh, A.2003. Labor market dynamics within rival macroeconomic frameworks . In Growth, distribution and e fective demand: Alternatives to economic orthodoxy, ed. G. Argyrous, M. Forstater, and G. Mongiovi , 127—43. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
33.
———. 2005. Economic policy in a growth context: A synthesis of Keynes and Harrod, version 3. Working paper, Department of Economics, New School University, New York.
34.
Stanley, T.D.2004. Does unemployment hysteresis falsify the natural rate hypothesis? A meta-regession analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys18 (4): 589—612.
35.
Stockhammer, E.2004. Is there an equilibrium rate of unemployment in the long run?Review of Political Economy16 (1): 59—78.
36.
Solow, R. M., and J. B. Taylor , eds. 1999. Inflation, unemployment, and monetary policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
37.
Taylor, J.B.1999. Monetary policy guidelines for employment and inflation stability. In Inflation, unemployment, and monetary policy, ed. R. M. Solow and J. B. Taylor, 29—54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Tobin, J.1995. The natural rate as new classical macroeconomics. In The natural rate of unemployment: Reflections on 25 years of the hypothesis, ed. R. Cross, 32—42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Walsh, C.E.2002. Teaching inflation targeting: An analysis for intermediate macro. Journal of Economic Education33 (4): 333—46.
40.
Woodford, M.2002. Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
