A theoretical analysis of capitalist relations of production shows that both the subsistence wage rate and the allocation of workers’ time between household and wage labor are determined by the household production function. In and of itself, this analysis tells us nothing at all about gender relations. It does, however, enable us to distinguish clearly between gender and class relations and thus to investigate their interrelationship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Hartmann, H. 1980. Contemporary Marxist theory and practice: A feminist critique. Review of Radical Political Economics12 (2): 87–94.
2.
Himmelweit, S. 1983a. Domestic labor. In A dictionary of Marxist thought, ed. T. Bottomore. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Himmelweit, S. 1983b. Value of labor power. In A dictionary of Marxist thought, ed. T. Bottomore. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Marx, K. 1987. Capital. Vol. 1. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
5.
Quick, P. 1977. The class nature of women’s oppression. Review of Radical Political Economics9 (3): 42–53.
6.
Quick, P. 1982. Capitalism and the origins of domestic labor. Review of Radical Political Economics24 (2): 1–7.
7.
Rubin, G. 1976. The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In Toward an anthropology of women, ed. R. Reiter, 157–210. New York: Monthly Review Press.
8.
Sargent, L. 1981. Women and revolution: The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism. Boston: South End.
9.
Vogel, L. 1986. Feminist scholarship: The impact of Marxism. In The left academy, Vol. 3, ed. B. Ollman and E. Vernoff. New York: Praeger.
10.
Vogel, L. 2000. Domestic labor revisited. Science and Society64 (2): 151–170.
