Applied neoclassical microeconomists maintain that when profits are constrained, and average costs are higher than marginal costs, Ramsey "inverse elasticity" pricing optimizes static consumer welfare. However, when weighted, instead of unweighted, consumer surplus aggregation is used, the Ramsey pricing rule becomes a "progressive social pricing rule," which suggests that under plausible conditions "direct-elasticity" rather than "inverse-elasticity" pricing is consumer welfare optimal.
Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). Lectures on public economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Baiman, R. P. (1992). Non-neoclassical microeconomics: a nominal total bill approach to residential telephone usage demand estimation. Ph.D. dissertation for the New School for Social Research. U.M.I. Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor, Mich.
3.
Baiman, R. P. (1993). Transitional and long-term telecommunications policy recommendations for New York State. Unpublished internal staff report for New York State Dept. of Economic Development.
4.
Baiman, R. P. (1995). Neoclassical economics and the end of equitable, open, and universal telecommunications services in the United States. Review of Radical Political Economics, 27 (3), 95-103.
5.
Baiman, R. P. (2000). Why the emperor has no clothes: the neoclassical case for price regulation. In Political Economy and Contemporary Capitalism: Radical Perspectives on Economic Theory and Policy. Baiman R., Boushey H., & Saunders D., Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
6.
Baumol, W. J. (1977). Economic theory and operations analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Baumol, W. J., & Blinder, A. S. (1985). Economics: principles and policy. 3rd ed.New York: Harcourt Brace.
8.
Baumol, W. J., & Bradford, D. (1970). Optimal departures from marginal cost pricing. American Economic Review, 60, 809-822.
9.
Baumol, W. J., Joskow, P. L., & Kahn, A. E. (1994). The challenge for federal and state regulators: transition from regulation to efficient competition in electric power. December 4. Paper submitted to FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) Docket No. RM 95-8-000.
10.
Chiang, A. C. (1984). Fundamental methods of mathematical economics. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw Hill.
11.
Colander, D. C. (1998). Microeconomics, 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Crew, M., & Kleindorfer, P. R. (1979). Public utility economics. New York: St. Martin's Press.
13.
Crossette, B. (1999). Happiness by the numbers. New York Times, Sept. 19, 2-2.
14.
Deaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Diamond, P. J., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). Optimal taxation and public production I: production efficiency. American Economic Review, 61, 8-27.
16.
Feldstein, M. S. (1972a). Distributional equity and the optimal structure of public prices. American Economic Review, 62, 32-36.
17.
Feldstein, M. S. (1972b). Equity and efficiency in public sector pricing: the optimal two-part tariff. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 86 (2), 175-187.
18.
Hicks, J. R. (1939). Value and capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Horwitz, R. B. (1989). The irony of regulatory reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Kuttner, R. (1996). Everything for sale. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
21.
Ramsey, F. (1927). A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal, 37, 47-61.
22.
Taylor, W. E., & Taylor, L. D. (1993). Postdivestiture long-distance competition in the United States. American Economic Review, May, 185-190.
23.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1998). Income 1997, table B, Selected measures of household income dispersion: 1967 to 1997, Nov. 11.
24.
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis, 3rd ed.New York: W. W. Norton.
25.
Willig, R. D. (1976). Consumer's surplus without apology. American Economic Review, September, 589-597.
26.
Wolf, E. N. (1998). Recent trends in the size distribution of household wealth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12 (3), 131-150.
