Living wage laws, it has been argued, will unavoidably generate significant fiscal impacts on the affected jurisdictions and negative outcomes in terms of economic development. In Baltimore, to date, the fiscal impacts have been trivial. The paper explores why this might be the case and whether this is a wholly desirable outcome. It also examines how the living wage may contribute to economic development in distressed urban areas.
Card, D. and A. Krueger. 1995. Myth and Measurement. The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
2.
Levine, M.1999. "A Third World City in the First World": Social Exclusion, Racial Inequality and Sustainable Development in Baltimore, USA." In Making Cities Socially Sustainable. A Comparative Study on Three Continents. M. Polese and R. Stren (eds.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
3.
Levine, M.1987. Downtown Redevelopment as an Urban Growth Strategy: A Critical Appraisal of the Baltimore Renaissance. The Journal of Urban Affairs9 (2): 103-123.
4.
Niedt, C., G. Ruiters, D. Wise, and E. Schoenberger. 1999. The Effects of the Living Wage in Baltimore. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute.
5.
Pollen, R. and S. Luce. 1998. The Living Wage. New York, N.Y.: New Press.
6.
Reich, M., P. Hall, and F. Hsu. 1999. Living Wages and the San Francisco Economy: The Benefits and Costs. Berkeley, Calif.: Center on Pay and Inequality, Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California at Berkeley.
7.
Schoenberger, E.1997. The Cultural Crisis of the Firm. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
Walker, R. 1999. California's Debt to Nature. Unpublished paper, Dept. of Geography, University of California, Berkeley.
9.
Weisbrodt, M. and M. Sforza-Roderick. 1996. Baltimore's Living Wage Lawv. An Analysis of the Fiscal and Economic Cost of Baltimore City Ordinance 442. Washington, D.C.: Preamble Center for Public Policy.
