PonticelliC., MinettiL., di PaloQuarto, VegetoA., BelliL.. The Milano clinical trial of ciclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantion. Contr Nephrol Karger, Basel1986; 51: 51.
2.
Opelz S for the Collaborative Transplant Study. Comparison of Immunosuppressive Protocols in renal transplantation: a multicentre view. Transplantion Proceed1988; 20: 31.
3.
Scornik JuanC., SalomonD.R., HowardR.J., PfaffW.W.. Prevention of transfusion induces broad sensitization in renal transplant candidates. Transplantation1989; 47: 617.
4.
GreensteinS.M., SchechnerR.S., LuisP., SenitzerD.. Edidence that zero antigenmatched ciclosporine treated renal transplant recipient have graft survival equal to that of matched recipients. Transplantation1990; 49: 332.
5.
ThorogoodJ., Van HowelingenJ.C., Van RoodT.J.. The impact of center variation on the HLA - DR matching effect in kidney graft survival. Transplantation1989; 48: 231.
6.
TerasakiP.I.. History of HLA: a personalized view. History of HLA: 10 recollections 1990, ed UCLA tissue tiping laboratory, Los Angeles, California.
7.
DonnelyP.K., SimpsonA.R., MilnerA.D.. Age matching improves the risults of renal transplantation with older donors:Nephrol Dial Transplant1990; 5: 808.
8.
The north Italy transplant program: factor influencing cadaver kidney transplantation outcome in ciclosporine era. Clinical Transplants1988, ed UCLA tissue typing laboratory, Los Angeles, California.