Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Different monoclonal antibodies have been used for the treatment of Netherton’s syndrome (NS); secukinumab (anti-IL17A), infliximab (anti-TNF-α), ustekinumab (anti p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23), omalizumab (anti-IgE), and dupilumab (anti-IL4 and IL13). We report two sisters with severe NS who were treated with omalizumab in one and with secukinumab in the other. In view of the therapeutic failure, treatment with dupilumab was started in both sisters. The data were analyzed 16 weeks after starting treatment with dupilumab. Treatment response was assessed using the Severity Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD); Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI); Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NSR); Netherton Area Severity Assessment (NASA) and Dermatology Life Quality Index Ichthyosis. All scores were reduced after 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab in both patients. She maintains improvement after 18 months and 12 months of treatment, respectively. No severe adverse events were reported. Treatment with dupilumab in two sisters with NS and atopic diseases produced a marked cutaneous improvement after a failed attempt with omalizumab and secukinumab. Further studies are needed to determine which biologic therapy is the most effective in NS.

Keywords

Netherton syndrome dupilumab atopic dermatitis secukinumab

Introduction

Netherton syndrome (NS) is a severe autosomal recessive skin disorder caused by mutations in the serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 5 gene (SPINK5), which encodes the lymphoepithelial Kazal-type-related inhibitor protein (LEKTI).¹ The immunological profile of NS has recently been studied. An IL-17/IL-36 signature has been shown, with predominant complement activation and Th2 allergic response in NS type ichthyosis linearis circumflexa (NS-ILC) and Th9 allergic response in NS type scaly erythroderma (NS-SE).² The use of biologics for the treatment of atopic dermatitis and/or psoriasis could be a promising strategy for the treatment of NS.³

We report two sisters with NS successfully treated with dupilumab (anti-ILR4A) after failed attempts with omalizumab (anti-IgE) in one and secukinumab (anti-IL17) in the other.

Case presentation

Without a history of consanguinity, both sisters were born with ichthyosiform erythroderma and were subsequently diagnosed with NS by genetic testing; the pathogenic variant c.2468dup p. (Lys824Glufs*4) was detected in heterozygosity in the SPINK5 gene in both patients.

Case 1

In 2015, the 28-year-old sister was reevaluated at the Allergy department due to worsening cutaneous and respiratory symptoms. She was diagnosed with severe persistent rhinoconjunctivitis and moderate persistent asthma with sensitization to house dust mites, grass pollen, fish, and shellfish. In vitro tests revealed a total IgE >5000 kU/L.

Skin examination revealed severe, extensive ILC affecting 80% of the body surface, predominantly on the trunk and upper extremities. The eyebrow hairs were sparse, and the scalp hairs were fine and brittle. A cutaneous punch revealed psoriasis form compatible with Netherton syndrome. Despite treatment with high doses of ciclesonide, as she did not tolerate long-acting beta-agonists due to distal tremor, the patient had poor asthma control (ACT 16).

Several topical treatments were tried with low effectiveness, including 0.1% tacrolimus ointment and medium and high-potency corticosteroids.

After signing written informed consent and hospital authorization, compassionate treatment with omalizumab 600 mg every 4 weeks did not improve skin symptoms. However, respiratory symptoms were improved. After 5 years of treatment with omalizumab, the patient presented mild rhinoconjunctivitis and intermittent asthma symptoms (ACT 24).

After the patient signed the written informed consent, the ethics committee authorized compassionate subcutaneous dupilumab use. Improvement was evaluated using Severity Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD); Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI); Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NSR); Netherton Area Severity Assessment (NASA), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).^4,5 Before treatment with dupilumab, the patient presented SCORAD 40.2; EASI 28; NSR 8; NASA 44.8, and DLQI 18. Treatment with dupilumab started in 2021 at 600 mg and 300 mg fortnightly. She noticed subjective improvement with the first dose of dupilumab within two to 3 days of its administration. With the successive doses of dupilumab, she experienced fewer skin flare-ups and itching and reduced use of topical corticosteroids. At week 16, all clinical parameters improved (Figure 1(a)). She is receiving dupilumab and maintains improvement 18 months later.

Figure 1.

(a) Case 1. At baseline vs.16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab (the patient consented to the publication of the photos). (b) Case 2. At baseline vs. 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab (the patient consented to the publication of the photos).

Case 2

In 2019, the younger sister was reevaluated at 27 years at the Dermatology department due to the progressive worsening of her skin symptoms. She was diagnosed with moderate rhinoconjunctivitis, hypersensitivity to fish and egg, and sensitization to house dust mites and grass pollen, egg, fish, and shellfish. In vitro tests revealed a total IgE >5000 kU/L. She was diagnosed in 2018 with adrenal insufficiency (Addison’s disease) secondary to prolonged use of high-potency topical corticosteroids. For this reason, the patient limited topical corticosteroids to severe flare-ups.

Skin examination revealed severe, extensive ILC lesions, predominantly on the trunk, arms, and legs, with steroid-induced skin atrophy. Punch biopsy revealed skin lined by an epidermis showing a very irregular thickness with areas of hyperplasia, with hyperkeratosis alternating with areas of parakeratosis.

Since the patient was using topical corticosteroids in a limited way due to her Addison’s disease and low efficiency, it was decided to start treatment with secukinumab. The patient signed the written informed consent, and the hospital’s ethics committee authorized secukinumab as a drug for compassionate use. In 2020, she started treatment with secukinumab 300 mg, with a favorable initial response and an apparent decrease in topical corticosteroid use. After 9 months of treatment, the patient presented a progressive loss of efficacy, with flare-ups prior to secukinumab administration, and needed more frequent treatment with topical corticosteroids.

Given the lack of efficacy with secukinumab and the improvement of her sister with NS in treatment with dupilumab, the patient signed the written informed consent, and dupilumab was authorized by our hospital’s ethics committee for compassionate use. Severity parameters were SCORAD: 47.5, EASI: 33.21, NASA: 49, NSR: 9, and DLQI: 16. In September 2021, treatment with dupilumab 600 mg followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks was started. One month after administration, the patient noticed less cutaneous itching and did not report using topical corticosteroids. At week 16, the patient improved all severity parameters. (Figure 1(b)). The improvement is maintained after 12 months of treatment.

Discussion

There are some case reports of treatment of severe NS with biologics targeting proinflammatory cytokines or specific immunoglobulins, such as anti-IL-17 ixekizumab,⁶ and secukinumab,^7,8 anti-TNF-α infliximab,⁹ anti-IL-12/IL-2 ustekinumab,¹⁰ and anti-IgE omalizumab,¹¹ as well as anti-IL-4/IL-13 dupilumab.^12–19

There is two case reports of NS treated with omalizumab.^11,16 In one patient, allergic skin symptoms and mucosal symptoms decreased.¹¹ In the other patient, the treatment with omalizumab was not effective.¹⁶

There are two reports on NS treated with secukinumab.^7,8 Blanchard et al.⁸ reported a case of NS successfully treated with secukinumab after a prior unsuccessful attempt with omalizumab. Luchsinger et al.⁷ published four cases, all successfully treated with secukinumab.

Ten patients with NS were treated with dupilumab, eight adults,^{12–14,16–19} and two children.¹⁵ Eight patients presented a steady improvement, whereas two adults^6,14 showed a temporary improvement. (Table 1).

Table 1.

List of published case reports of NS patients treated with dupilumab.

Reference	Age (year)	Gender	Previous treatment	Total treatment duration	Response	Adverse events	Discontinuation	SPINK5 Mutation
Steuer 2020¹²	32	Female	Topical CS, tacrolimus 0.1% ointment, tazarotene, cyclosporine	18 M	Improvement from the	Not reported	No	Not reported
Steuer 2020¹²	32	Female		18 M	2^nd month of treatment	Not reported	No	Not reported
Andreasen 2020¹⁷	43	Male	Topical and systemic CS, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, phototherapy	6 M	Improvement from the 4^th week of treatment	Not reported	No	c.316_317delGA, p. (Asp106Trpfs*7)
Aktas 2020¹⁴	40	Female	Topical CS, tacrolimus 0.1% ointment, topical retinoids, azathioprine, cyclosporine, IVIg	3 M	Temporal response from the week 6^th to week 8^th of treatment	Conjunctivitis	Yes	Not reported
Süßmuth 2021¹⁵	12	Female	Not reported	12 M	Improvement from the 4^th month of treatment	Bacterial infection	No	Not reported
Süßmuth 2021¹⁵	8	Male	IVIg	10 M	Improvement from the 10^th month of treatment		No	Not reported
Murase 2021¹⁶	32	Female	Oral and topical CS	6 M	Improvement from the 6^th months	None	No	c.1621 G > T (p. Glu541) c.2245 A > T (p. Arg749)
Murase 2021¹⁶	17	Female	Oral and topical CS, omalizumab	6 M	Improvement from the 6^th months	None	No	c.2368 C > T (p.Arg790*)
Inaba 2022¹⁸	26	Male	Moisturizers and antihistamines	12 M	Sustained	None	No	c.377_378delAT
Ragamin 2022⁶	41	Female	Oral and topical CS, antibiotics (cefuroxime), cyclosporine, emollients, and zinc oxide	6 M	Temporal response from the month 2^nd to month 5^th	Fatigue in the first month	Yes	Not reported
Galdo 2022¹⁹	42	Female	Steroids and antihistamines		Improvement at 28 and 56 days	Not reported	No	Not reported
Wang 2022¹³	20	Female	Topical CS, antibiotics, oral antihistamines, acitren	4 M	Improvement in 2^nd weeks	Not reported	No	c.1220 + 5G>A
Wang 2022¹³	20	Female	Topical CS, antibiotics, oral antihistamines, acitren	4 M	Improvement in 2^nd weeks	Not reported	No	c.1870deIA
Present cases	28	Female	Oral and topical CS, tacrolimus 0.1%, omalizumab	18 M	Improvement from the first dose of 600 mcg	Conjunctivitis-Mild transient hypereosinophilia	No	c.2468dup p. (Lys824Glufs*4)
Present cases	27	Female	Oral and topical CS, tacrolimus 0.1%, secukinumab	12 M	Improvement in the 7 ^nd week	Eyelashes	No	c.2468dup p. (Lys824Glufs*4)

Abbreviations: CS: corticosteroid; IVIg: intravenous immunoglobulin; M: months.

Conclusions

The success of dupilumab treatment is possibly related to the phenotype of NS-ILC in both patients. Dupilumab reduces T2 inflammation. In addition, blocking IL-13 reduces epithelial permeability, and blocking IL-4 reduces IgE synthesis, thus further reducing inflammation.²⁰

Dupilumab could be effective and safe treatment in patients with NS, probably those with NS-ILC phenotype.

Footnotes

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank the two patients for their consent to the publication of the photos.

Authors’ contributions

Martin- García C, Godoy E, Cañueto J and Muñoz-Bellido FJ and Davila I: designed the study and wrote the manuscript. Perez-Pazos J: performed the genetic study of patients. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Cristina Martin-Garcia

Javier Cañueto

Ignacio Davila

References

Chavanas

Bodemer

Rochat

, et al. (2000) Mutations in SPINK5, encoding a serine protease inhibitor, cause Netherton syndrome. Nature genetics 25(2): 141–142.

Barbieux

Bonnet des Claustres

Fahrner

, et al. (2022) Netherton syndrome subtypes share IL-17/IL-36 signature with distinct IFN-α and allergic responses. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 149(4): 1358–1372.

Akiyama

(2022) Understanding immune profiles in ichthyosis may lead to novel therapeutic targets. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 149(4): 1210–1212.

Eichenfield

Tom

Chamlin

, et al. (2014) Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 70(2): 338–351.

Yan

Honig

Ming

, et al. (2010) The safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus, 1%, cream for the treatment of Netherton syndrome: results from an exploratory study. Archives of dermatology 146(1): 57–62.

Ragamin

Nouwen

AEM

Dalm

VASH

, et al. (2022) Treatment experiences with intravenous immunoglobulins, ixekizumab, dupilumab, and anakinra in Netherton syndrome: a case series. Dermatology 239: 72–80.

Luchsinger

Knöpfel

Theiler

, et al. (2020) Secukinumab therapy for Netherton syndrome. JAMA dermatology 156(8): 907–911.

Blanchard

Prose

(2020) Successful use of secukinumab in Netherton syndrome. JAAD case reports 6(6):577–578.

Roda

Mendonça-Sanches

Travassos

, et al. (2017) Infliximab therapy for Netherton syndrome: a case report. JAAD case reports 3(6):550–552.

10.

Volc

Maier

Gritsch

, et al. (2020) Successful treatment of Netherton syndrome with ustekinumab in a 15-year-old girl. The British journal of dermatology 183(1): 165–167.

11.

Yalcin

(2016) A case of Netherton syndrome: successful treatment with omalizumab and pulse prednisolone and its effects on cytokines and immunoglobulin levels. Immunopharmacology and immunotoxicology 38(2): 162–166.

12.

Steuer

Cohen

. (2020) Treatment of Netherton Syndrome With Dupilumab. JAMA dermatology 156(3): 350–351.

13.

Wang

Zhang

, et al. (2022) Successful treatment of Netherton syndrome with dupilumab: A case report and review of the literature. The Journal of dermatology 49(1): 165–167.

14.

Aktas

Salman

Apti Sengun

, et al. (2020) Netherton syndrome: temporary response to dupilumab. Pediatric dermatology 37(6): 1210–1211.

15.

Süßmuth

Traupe

Loser

, et al. (2021) Response to dupilumab in two children with Netherton syndrome: improvement of pruritus and scaling. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV 35(2): e152–e155.

16.

Murase

Takeichi

Taki

, et al. (2021) Successful dupilumab treatment for ichthyotic and atopic features of Netherton syndrome. Journal of dermatological science 102(2): 126–129.

17.

Andreasen

Karstensen

Duno

, et al. (2020) Successful treatment with dupilumab of an adult with Netherton syndrome. Clinical and experimental dermatology 45(7): 915–917.

18.

Inaba

Kanazawa

Muraoka

, et al. (2022) Dupilumab improves pruritus in Netherton syndrome: a case study. Children (Basel) 9(3): 310.

19.

Galdo

Fania

(2022) A Netherton syndrome case report: response to dupilumab treatment. Dermatologic therapy 35: e15862.

20.

Hamilton

Harel

Swanson

, et al. (2021) Dupilumab suppresses type 2 inflammatory biomarkers across multiple atopic, allergic diseases. Clinical and experimental allergy: journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology 51(7): 915–931.

Report of two sisters with Netherton syndrome successfully treated with dupilumab and review of the literature