Abstract
Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a minimally invasive procedure usually well tolerated, easy to perform, quick, cheap and easy to repeat in case of doubts or non-diagnostic results. Echography is also a fast, cheap and non-invasive tool; however, the role of FNAC and echography in the diagnosis of salivary gland pathology is not universally recognised. Three hundred and fifty-seven patients with a cytological diagnosis at FNAC, and 247 of these who were also studied with echography, were enrolled for this retrospective study. The final histopathological diagnoses, obtained after surgery, were then compared to the preoperative FNAC diagnoses and echographic findings. From the analysis of our data, the overall FNAC specificity resulted 93%, sensitivity 83%, and diagnostic accuracy 92%. Echography sensibility was 57.1% specificity 98.2%, while positive and negative predictive value were respectively 80% and 94.8%. While echography can be useful in order to provide a better characterization of salivary gland lesions, FNAC can then be considered a safe diagnostic tool with reliable sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of salivary gland pathology and thus for selecting patients and indicating the best surgical treatment.