The need for bone grafting procedures to replace skeletal defects has become more considerable because of increased opportunities to save major bone loss. We report our experience and a critical analysis about the role of bone grafts and bone graft substitutes in prosthetic hip surgery replacement.
KurtzSMowatFOngKChanNLauEHalpernM. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1487–97.
2.
AnagnostakosKSchmidNVKelmJGrunUJungJ. Classification of hip joint infections. Int. J. Med. Sci.2009; 6(5):227–233.
3.
De LongWGJrEinhornTAKovalKMcKeeMSmithWSandersRWatsonT. Bone grafts and bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma surgery. A critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(3):649–58.
4.
GillTJSledgeJBMullerME. The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty Indications, principles and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1998;80-B:946–53.
5.
ValleCJPaproskyWG. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-ASuppl 4:1–6.
6.
PipinoFMolfettaL. GIR classification of acetabular and femoral bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty surgery. J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2000; 2:69–77.
7.
ChoplinRHHenleyCNEricMECapelloWRankinJLBuckwalterKA. Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Bone Deficiency of the Acetabulum. RadioGraphics. 2008; 28:771–786.
8.
HansenEShearerDRiesMD. Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469:494–502.
9.
EftekharNSNercessianO. Intrapelvic migration of total hip prostheses. Operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1480–1486.
10.
SporerSMO'RourkeMChongPPaproskyWG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(4):760–5.
11.
ButtaroMACombaFPussoRPiccalugaF. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:2482–2490.
12.
CammisaFPJrLoweryGGarfinSRGeislerFHKlaraPMMcGuireRASassardWRStubbsHBlockJE. Two-year fusion rate equivalency between Grafton DBM gel and autograft in posterolateral spine fusion: A prospective controlled trial employing a side-by-side comparison in the same patient. Spine. 2004;29(6):660–6.
13.
BostromMPSeigermanDA. The clinical use of allografts, demineralized bone matrices, synthetic bone graft substitutes and osteoinductive growth factors: A survey study. HSS J. 2005;1(1):9–18.
14.
WaeseEYKandelRRStanfordWL. Application of stem cells in bone repair. Skeletal Radiol2008; 37(7):601–8.
15.
SalkeldSLPatronLPBarrackRLCookSD. The effect of osteogenic protein-1 on the healing of segmental bone defects treated with autograft or allograft bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(6):803–16.
16.
BouxseinMLTurekTJBlakeCAD'AugustaDLiXStevensMSeehermanHJWozneyJM. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 accelerates healing in a rabbit ulnar osteotomy model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(8):1219–30.
